commentary Romans 11

1 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

     The previous two chapters have left no doubt about Israel’s spiritual condition. For long centuries God had endured their obstinacy and disobedience (Rom 9:22; 10:21), and now He would “thrust them from Him” (cf. castapotheomai in Acts 7:39). In truth, the Apostle has left Israel’s situation so dire we might wonder if God has disallowed them from the Kingdom entirely. Hath God cast away His chosen people completely? That is, in opening the door to the Gentiles, has He shut the door to the Jews? Not at all! A faithful, Godly remnant of Jews, the election of grace (Rom 11:5), did believe the Gospel. They, along with believing Gentiles, have become the new people of God. The failure of the Jews to accept Christ gave opportunity to the Gentiles to be included. And even now the Jews can obtain mercy if they trust in Jesus Christ (v31).

     Chapter 11 finishes the subject of Israel’s fall and the Gentiles’ calling into the new Kingdom of Christ that has dictated the flow of the book to this point. The final chapters will address other topics. Impressively, Paul wrote these chapters before the fall of Jerusalem which abruptly ended the religion of Judaism according to the Law of Moses. At the time of this writing, Jerusalem was at the pinnacle of Jewish worship and life; the temple with its priests and sacrifices was at its peak form and the Judaic Law had not been more strictly observed since the time of Moses and Joshua. Yet just a decade after this book was written, Jerusalem would be ruined by the Roman armies and the beautiful Temple totally destroyed. The daily lamb sacrifices would cease to be offered in waning days of the siege and have never been offered since, partly because the Muslims have built the Dome of the Rock shrine upon the very site where the Temple once stood.  

     The tribes of Benjamin and Judah seem to have physically shared the city of Jerusalem and Simeon was entirely within the borders of Judah. So these three tribes, or parts of them at least, became the kingdom of Judah. The remaining northern tribes were known collectively as Ephraim or Israel until their fall to the Assyrians, when they disappeared into the nations of the world forever.

2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying, 3 Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life. 4 But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal.

     One clear evidence that God has not disallowed the Israelites from salvation is the believing Jewish remnant, or election according to grace, found in the churches of Christ (Rom 11:5). While they were soon out-weighed by the floods of Gentiles, there were many Jews who did follow Christ. The people of the Law are no longer God’s chosen (see Rom 11:15; Col 3:11; Mat 21:43; Heb 8:13), but He has not cast them all away. Earlier the Apostle showed that the everlasting promises of God to Abraham’s seed according to the flesh (i.e. Gen 17:7-8; Jer 31:35-37; Is 49:14-16; 1Sam 12:22) have not fallen void, but are now upon his seed according to faith (see my note for Rom 9:6). This truth was hidden in many Old Testament prophecies (see Is 59:19-21; Jer 31:31-34; Dan 7:18).  

     Elijah thought he was the only man left in Israel who still served the Lord, but God knew that there were 7,000 who were still faithful to Him. Even so it was at the time the Apostle wrote this book (v5). Among the multitudes of hypocrites and ignorants, there was a firstfruit that was still holy unto the Lord. The Jewish identity of that remnant has disappeared – assimilated into the New Covenant people of God. They are now part of God’s olive tree which puts no difference in persons, where all nations and peoples are one in Christ.

     Israel after the flesh still exists and identifies as Jewish even down to the present day. Many take that fact alone to mean that God has miraculously preserved them for the sake of blessing. Adam Clarke writes, “[The Jews] being preserved as a distinct people is certainly a strong collateral proof that they shall once more be brought into the Church of God: and their conversion to Christianity will be an incontestable proof of the truth of Divine revelation; and doubtless will become the means of converting multitudes of deists, who will see the prophecies of God, which had been delivered so long before, so strikingly fulfilled in this great event…the several Jews who have now embraced Christianity, are pledges that God will, in process of time, admit the whole Jewish nation into his favor again.”

     What? The Jews have been the off-scouring of the earth ever since the time of Christ! More than any other race, they have been discriminated, despised and killed in all the nations of the world whithersoever they are found. And why? Because they continue to forsake God and reject the Messiah that He sent to them. Consequently, their unending story for the last 2000 years is marked by hatred and death. No, God has not preserved the Jews to bless them, but to make them an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all the nations whither the Lord shall lead thee (Deut 28:37). For just as the Lord was prepared to rejoice over Israel to do her good, He has now rejoiced over her to destroy and bring to nought (Deut 28:63). Again, it is because thou hearkenedst not unto the voice of the Lord thy God…Moreover all these curses shall come upon thee, and shall pursue thee…And they shall be upon thee for a sign and for a wonder, and upon thy seed for ever (Deut 28:45-46).

     So Clarke’s “collateral proof” must be rejected on authority of Scripture. Furthermore, where does the New Testament so much as hint that, a) the Jews will convert en masse to Christianity, b) that they will be the means of converting multitudes of unbelievers and, c) that the world will suddenly believe the Bible to be true when they see its prophecies being fulfilled? These ideas are simply not found therein. In fact, Jesus said the Jews of His day wouldn’t believe even if someone they knew were to rise from the dead and preach to them (Luke 16:30-31). 

     Since the time of Christ, the Jews’ brightest moment (in the physical sense) has come in the last century, when after the horrible Nazi Holocaust several influential nations repatriated thousands of Jews to their homeland and formed for them the state of Israel. Yet even there they have been constantly terrorized, attacked and bombed. They continue to openly reject Jesus Christ and most do not even believe in the God of their Old Testament. A full one-half of Jews in Israel identify as “secular,” and Christian missionaries there have found the Muslims to be more amenable to the Gospel than the Jews.

     Jews according to the flesh continue to be a sign for all the world to know what happens when a nation rejects Him. The Lord told Solomon, But if ye turn away, and forsake My statutes…then will I cast out of My sight, and will make it to be a proverb and a byword among all nations. And this house, which is high, shall be an astonishment to every one that passeth by it; so that he shall say, Why hath the Lord done thus unto this land and unto this house? And it shall be answered, Because they forsook the Lord God…and laid hold on other gods, and worshipped them, and served them: therefore hath He brought all this evil upon them (2Chr 7:18-22). Years later, the prophet Jeremiah recounted the same curse when he prophesied of the northern tribes:  And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them. And I will send the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, among them, till they be consumed from off the land that I gave unto them and to their fathers (Jer 24:9-10).

5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. 6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. 7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded

     This remnant of Jews that began the New Covenant church may have been dwarfed by the Gentile crowds, but the level of commitment and holiness in that lump was surely of the purest grade (v16). The Apostles, evangelists, deacons and elders from among the Jews were notable men of God in the early stage of the Christian church. This elect group found grace in the eyes of the Lord and were saved, but the rest were blinded.

     The election of Grace. The method of the New Covenant, or Age of Grace, is that God elects a person to salvation according to his faith (Tit 1:2; 1Pet 1:2; Luke 18:7; Luke 7:50; Mat 15:28). This juxtaposition of New Testament Grace with Old Testament Works has been an important theme in the Apostle’s message, for Israel after the flesh was still seeking to receive the promises by following the Law. Yet, a Godly remnant had obtained the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ (Rom 5:15). The book of Romans affirms that righteousness unto salvation cannot be earned by works (Rom 3:22; 4:13; 10:6), but is graced to the believer on account of his faith in Christ (Rom 4:4; 5:2; 10:9). The elect are the true followers of Christ, having come willingly to Him in full faith (Rom 8:33; Col 3:12; 2Pet 1:10; Mat 24:31; Rom 9:11); and, he that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out (John 6:37). Calvinists have intemperately defined this election of grace to be a one-sided decision by God to save certain ones, yet the verses we have listed show that the elect have not only reciprocated that decision, they are diligently working to confirm it. The Lord is rich unto all that call upon Him (Rom 10:12; 2Th 1:11). 

     The verb in verse 7 is in the present tense: “Israel continues to seek for something the election have already obtained” (see Rom 9:31). Here, perhaps, the election refers only to the Jews who then believed the truth of the Gospel, for that is the subject of these verses. According to chapter 9 however, the full election of Grace are the called of both Jews and Gentiles by faith (v11-24).

     The proponents of Dispensationalism and Pre-millennialism attempt to place the bulk of this chapter in a future Jewish Age. To them, the election refers to a future Jewish “remnant,” although how it might be called a remnant is doubtful. The Jewish religion as formulated by the Mosaic Law ceased to be observed centuries ago. It may exist in name today, but lacks many of the Old Testament laws, rituals and ceremonies. The constant intention of the Apostle in this book is that Judaism is not an alternate way to God, seeing that it lacks the power to forgive sins. Why then would God chose to re-instate the Jews and the Law?!? The foolish Galatians were bewitched by the same false doctrine (Gal 3:1-3). Additionally, the guileless reader cannot fail to recognize that Paul’s whole purpose here is to persuade his fellow countrymen to break entirely with the Law just as he had done (Php 3:5-8). Far from offering them a hope that God would re-recognize the Israelite nation someday, he prays that they will be provoked to jealousy as they see God blessing the Gentiles and request to be grafted back into the olive tree with them (v31).

8 (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day.

     Beginning with the twelve children of Jacob, the Jewish people have been a notoriously stiff-necked and rebellious population (Deut 9:6-7), ever given to selfishness, materialism and the rejection of Truth. God often reminded the Prophets of that reputation. His words upon commissioning Ezekiel are a typical example: Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against Me: they and their fathers have transgressed against Me, even unto this very day. For they are impudent children and stiffhearted (Eze 2:2-4).

     The Jews wickedly provoked God in the wilderness (Heb 3:8-10), demanded of Him a king instead of a prophet (1Sam 8:6-22) and constantly fell to worshipping the gods of the land (Jer 13:9-10). Their worst iniquity however, came at the end, when they rejected their Messiah, the Prince of peace and Hope of the Ages. Just before they stoned him to death, Stephen recounted their shocking history of rebellions: Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye. Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers: who have received the Law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it. When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with their teeth (Acts 7:51-54). Matthew chapter 23 documents the appalling rebellion and obstinacy of that generation of vipers, the Jewish people according to the flesh.

     Eyes that they should see not. Jesus quoted this same verse to the Jews of His day (Mat 13:14; John 12:40) and Paul famously spoke it to the Roman Jews shortly before his death (Acts 28:26-28). While the main passage is drawn from Isaiah 6:9-10, there is a fitting phrase taken from Isaiah 29:10, For the Lord hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes (see also Is 44:18). In their deepest heart, I believe the Jews knew the truth, but they refused to allow that kernel of knowledge to develop unto genuine faith (see my note for John 7:5 and Mat 11:6). Many, many people have been offended by Christ and His message down to the present day! They just refuse to accept what their eyes, ears and minds are saying. They don’t want to hear it, don’t want to know about it – because they don’t want to take the next step of faith, which is to acknowledge the truth and act upon it in submission and obedience.

9 And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: 10 Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.

     This quote comes from the Septuagint version of Psalms 69:22-23, where the Greek word for stumblingblock is skandalon, which is often translated offence (Ps 119:165; Mat 13:21; Gal 5:11; Luke 7:23). Psalm 69 is a moving, highly prophetic cry of the Messiah unto God and it contains several striking prophecies of the Jew’s rejection of Jesus: “They hated Me without a cause; they would wrongfully destroy Me (v4). I am a stranger unto My brethren, for the zeal of thine house hath eaten Me up (v8). Deliver Me, O Lord, from them that hate Me and hide not Thy face from Thy servant: for I am in trouble (v17). Let not the deep swallow Me up, nor the pit shut her mouth upon Me (v15). They gave Me also gall and vinegar to drink (v21). Their reproach has broken My heart and I am full of heaviness; I looked for someone to take pity, but there was none (v20). So let their table become a snare and a trap before them (v22). Let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see, and make their loins continually to shake (v23). Pour out thine indignation upon them and let their habitation be desolate, for they persecute Him whom thou has smitten. Add iniquity unto their iniquity, and blot out their name from the books of righteousness (v26).”

     Let their table be made a snare. David used the word table as a euphemism for the contentment and stability of normal life (see Ps 23:5; 78:19; 128:3). The Jews professed to have a place in the table of the Lord (Mal 1:12), but they could not see beyond their customs and rituals. They became for them a snare and a trap, a stumblingblock to believing in Christ.

     Let them bow down their back alway. This follows the Septuagint version of Ps 69:23, while the Masoretic text of our English Old Testaments reads, “make their loins continually to shake.” Both phrases seem to be allusions to Moses’ final words to the children of Israel, predicting that their stubborness would eventually lead them to bow their backs unto slavery, captivity (Deut 28:41-44) and constant, pitiable fear for their very lives (Deut 28:65-67). The generation of Jews are destined to suffering and discrimination as long as they continue to reject the Truth (see note for Mat 24:34). 

     The wicked Jews who killed the Christ (1Thes 2:15; Acts 7:52) actually requested that His innocent blood be attributed to them and their children! (Mat 27:24-25). Such inexcusable hardness of heart and rejoicing in iniquity the world has never seen, nor will it ever be equaled. And while God will not punish the children for the sins of their fathers, the words of those Jewish murderers have rang eerily true to the historical reaction of general Jewdom to the message of the Gospel even down to this very day.

11 I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy. 12 Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness? 13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: 14 If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them. 15 For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?

     The astounding offenses of the Israelite people ended with God dispossessing them as His chosen ones in favor of the new Israel of God, made up of Jews and Gentiles according to the faith of Abraham instead of the blood of Abraham. Yet, God was able to turn the stumbling of the Jews into a thing of beauty, for through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles. And that great blessing itself comes with a Jewish benefit, for when the Jew sees God showing favor and goodness to those who were not even a people (Rom 9:26), will he not be provoked to jealousy and return unto God? (Rom 10:19).

     How much more their fulness (pleroma, to fill up, fulfill, full). The restoration of the Jews to the fold of God (compare Rom 11:25) is the apparent subject of this rhetorical question: “If their fall resulted in Gentile blessing, would not their fulness be even more blessed?.” For the last 2000 years however, we haven’t seen natural Jews becoming jealous of the Gentiles being accepted by God. Rather than softening their stance on Jesus Christ, the vast majority of Jews have stiffened themselves even more against Him. I believe Paul asked this question in hopeful terms, without intending to make a subtle prophecy. For he follows by saying, if by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them (v14).  

     Far from distaining the Jewish race for their contumacy, Paul hoped for their salvation with the Gentiles. How beautiful that would be! The New Testament Scriptures are silent regarding the Jewish nation turning to Christ, but that does not deter the Pre-millennialists and Dispensationalists, who think God will re-instate Israel as His chosen people with new blessings and favor (see note v2). However, they can offer only a few verses with dubious intimations and suggestions (their favorites are Mat 23:39; Acts 1:6-7; Rom 11:25-26; Rev 11:1). Not one of these offers a different hope for Israel than that which is offered to every other Gentile nation. Accept Christ as Savior and Sovereign, that is the only way to God (1Cor 3:11; 1Tim 2:5). Certainly there are Jews who daily hear and live by the Truth of the Gospel, and these do add fulness to the Church of Jesus Christ, but that the Jews in general will accept Jesus the Nazarene as their Messiah is neither prophesied nor promised. Jesus would not even touch the disciples’ direct question to that effect (Acts 1:6-7).

     I magnify my office. Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles (Acts 9:15; Gal 2:8; Eph 3:8; 2Tim 1:11), yet if by preaching to the heathen he could provoke to jealousy some of his own countrymen, how he would rejoice! He would receive them with the joy of one who saw his son alive again from dead (see Luke 15:24). The words emulation (v14) and jealousy (v11) are translated from the same Greek word. The thought is based on Moses’ prophecy in Deut 32:21, which was also cited in Rom 10:19.

     We are once again deeply impressed with the dexterity and tact of the Apostle Paul in presenting Christ to his countrymen (see note on Romans 7:9). He couples strong words and tough truth with deep entreaties and heart-felt appeals, emphasizing their advantages as highly privileged people with an inside track to God on account of their many experiences in God’s great mercy and love, while yet showing that their unbelief and rejection of truth would result in being cast off if they did not repent.

16 For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches. 17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;

     The firstfruit and root refer to the Jewish patriarchs and especially to Abraham, the father of the faithful. These being holy, so too should be the branches and lump thereof. Some branches though, did not bear good fruit and these were purged from the tree and cast into the fire (John 15:1-6). The holy firstfruit had been contaminated by a little leaven which had leavened the whole lump (1Cor 5:6-7; Gal 5:9). Yet, cannot the Potter make from the same lump of clay a new vessel (Rom 9:21)?

     Tree grafting makes a beautiful analogy of the Kingdom of Christ, for it remarkably demonstrates the origins and makeup of the New Covenant. God didn’t cut down the Jewish olive tree and plant a new Gentile tree, nor did He just ignore the unfruitful Jewish tree and cultivate a Gentile tree. Instead, He worked in a marvelous way with the Jewish tree so that it would accept and nourish Gentile branches! The olive tree represents the true people of God, which are now found in Jesus Christ’s Covenant of Peace (Eze 34:23-26). Even today the secular world recognizes the olive branch as a symbol of peace. The prophet Jeremiah spoke of Israel as a green olive tree, fair, and of goodly fruit, but on account of her evil ways, the Planter had caused her branches to be broken off (Jer 11:16-17).

     The two key points in this analogy is that God has only one tree and by nature it is Jewish. This is evidently and consistently shown throughout this passage. The Jews are the natural branches and the Gentiles branches are taken from a wild olive tree. And that is corroborated by the broad teaching of the New Testament, which describes the New Covenant people in Old Testament terms (compare 1Pet 2:9 to Ex 19:6) and identifies the children of Abraham spiritually instead of genetically (Gal 3:7). The true Jew is determined inwardly (Rom 2:29), allowing the Gentiles to be part of the true circumcision instead of Israel after the flesh (Php 3:3; Col 2:11), which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan (Rev 2:9; 3:9). The Gentile with faith in Christ is a child of Abraham and so a Jew; not by blood but by adoption, by being graffed in.

     The Scriptures are emphatic concerning the above point, that the true people of God in the New Covenant are Jews. They are no less vigorous in teaching that God has only one tree, or people (Heb 8:10). I am the vine, ye are the branches (John 15:5). There is one fold, and one Shepherd (John 10:16). He has broken down that wall of partition between the Jew and the Gentile forever (Eph 2:14). They are one stick in His hand (Eze 37:16-28), one body (Eph 4:4) of God’s building (1Cor 3:9), an holy temple (Eph 2:21), and a spiritual house (1Pet 2:5). There is now no difference between the Jew and the Greek (Rom 10:12).

     How can any think that God will undo these affirmations? For the teaching of the Millennialists is greatly opposed. God has two programs, they say, one for the Jews and one for the Gentiles. God paused His program for the Jews (because they rejected the Messiah) and right now is developing His program for the Gentiles. But at some point, He will close that program and re-take the Jews, who will rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem and re-instate the Judaic Covenant complete with blood sacrifices and ritual ceremonies! Yet the Apostle Paul in these chapters shows just one tree with Jewish and Gentile branches intermingled. God, the keeper of this olive tree, works with all branches so that they might bring forth much fruit (Mat 7:17-19). Some branches will not produce and must be cut off and burned. Other branches are graffed in wild, to partake of the root and fatness of the olive tree (the patriarchs of promise in v16). The wild branches have become one with the natural branches. Together they receive the same blessings that were given to Abraham. See verse 24.

18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. 19 Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in. 20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: 21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.

     The Apostle here speaks to the Gentiles (see v13). “Do not become arrogant and full of pride (1Cor 10:12) on account of being accepted into the olive tree of the Lord! Do not think yourselves better than the Jewish branches just because God has broken them off and grafted you in (compare Deut 9:4-6). Don’t forget that you are just the branch and owe your existence to the root which bears you. So be not highminded, but fear. If God cut off many Jewish branches for refusing His Son, He will not hesitate to cut off any Gentile branches that allow an evil heart of unbelief to take them away from the living God (Heb 3:12).”

     The erroneous ideas of Calvinism are confounded by this picture. Jesus said, Every branch in Me that beareth not fruit He taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, He purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit (John 15:2). Israel after the flesh was a branch in God, but made a decision to reject Him. And so He has also rejected her. This reciprocal rejection is strikingly illustrated by God rejecting once-chosen Saul after Saul had rejected Him (see 1Sam 15:26). The prophet described Israel as a beautiful vineyard which God had chosen, fenced and planted with the choicest vine. He spared no expense to give that vineyard every benefit, but it produced only wild grapes. Finally, God left the vineyard and it fell into ruin, briers and thorns (Is 5:1-7). But a good and Godly remnant rose up to take its place.

     The natural and wild branches of this olive tree make an analogy that is in many ways similar to the analogy of natural and adopted children (Rom 8:15; Gal 4:5). Some in the Kingdom are Abraham’s blood children and others by adoption, being counted children according to Faith (Rom 4:16; Gal 3:7). A similar analogy is seen in Rev 7, where the twelve tribes of Israel make a symbolic representation of the one olive tree of God. That passage also warns of broken branches, for the tribe of Dan is missing, left out of the final chosen for salvation.

22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off. 23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again. 24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?

     God’s mercy is counter-balanced by His righteousness – He cannot overlook sin. He shows goodness to those who are of meek and contrite heart (Ps 51:17), but severity to the proud and unrepentant (Pro 16:5). This truth was published at length in Rom 9:12-20. If the Gentile branches continue in doing good, they shall continue in His goodness; otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

     Moreover, if the Jewish branches throw off their unbelief and accept the Gospel, God will graft them back into their own olive tree. There is no bitterness in God, neither will He keep His anger forever (Ps 103:9). The olive tree, Christ’s present Kingdom of Peace on the earth, is Jewish by nature – the Gentiles have been granted place, have been grafted in. And that picture is historically accurate, for God’s olive tree with its Jewish branches existed before Christ. The tree will continue unto the end of the Age, with Jew and Gentile branches intermingled.

     This birth of Christianity from the Jewish religion is illustrated in Revelation 12, which describes a sun-clothed woman (Israel) giving birth to a Manchild (Christ) who was to rule all nations. The Child was caught up to the throne of God and the woman was forced to flee into the wilderness, where the earth helped her survive (the Jews survive in all parts of the globe even to the present day). The Dragon was especially wroth with the remnant of the woman’s seed (the Church), and went to make war with them.

25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

     The Apostle has described a broad spiritual blindness of the Jews to the Gospel (Rom 11:7-10). Only a remnant believed on Christ (Rom 11:1-5). This mysterious blindness in part will continue until a particular event occurs: the fulness (pleroma) of the Gentiles be come in. Paul used the same word earlier in reference to Israel (Rom 11:12). The NIV translates it: “Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in.” There has been much speculation and contention concerning the meaning of this final phrase! Let us consider it carefully by that good, three-part hermeneutical method which should undergird the sincere reading of the Bible. 1) Let the words be defined by their usage elsewhere in the Scriptures instead of resorting to etymologies and secular Greek writings. 2) Be sure to consider the general teaching of the greater passage. 3) Be sure that your reading is consistent with the rest of the Scriptures.

     Blindness in part (meros) is happened to Israel. The Apostle does not say a temporary blindness has befallen Israel, but a partial blindness (see meros  in Mat 24:51; John 19:23; 1Cor 11:18). That is, this blindness is not for a certain period of time, but upon a particular portion of Israel (v7). It will continue until such moment that the fulness (pleroma) of the Gentiles be come in. In the Greek Scriptures, the noun pleroma and its verb pleroo mean to fill up, full, to fulfill. The earth is the Lord’s and the fulness thereof (1Cor 10:26); when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth His Son (Gal 4:4; see also Mat 9:16; John 1:16; Eph 3:19). So unless Paul used “fulness” in a loose, indeterminate sense, the candid idea here is that Israel will remain partially blinded until the Gentiles have filled their share in the Kingdom. Jesus’ prophecy concerning the Jews is harmonious, And they (the Jews) shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled (Luke 21:24).

     If this be the Apostle’s intention with fulness of the Gentiles, then the period can only end at the Second Coming of Christ, at which moment the Age of Grace will be fulfilled. The Revelation assigns to the Gentile Age a symbolic length of duration – 3-1/2 times, which equals 42 months or 1260 days. This half-seven completes the mystery of God for the world of His creation, for it ends with the Beast and all thing wicked being thrown into the eternal Lake of Fire (see note on Rev 11:3). During this time, the Gentiles will tread Jerusalem for 42 months (Rev 11:2) and the woman (Israel) will be nourished in the wilderness for 1260 days or 3-1/2 times (Rev 12:6, 14). All of this points to the conclusion that Israel after the flesh will remain in blindness until the end, which accords with the traditional A-millennial view that the Age of Grace will continue until the sudden return of Christ at the end of the world.   

     Pre-millennialism, on the other hand, has inserted a 1000 year time-period between the Second Coming and the destruction of the world. They place many of the so-called unfulfilled prophecies in that future Age, in which Israel will become the head of all nations and a tremendous Jewish revival will occur. The Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem and the entire Jewish nation will believe upon Christ. At the end of that Age, rampant and wholesale apostasy will require Christ to come again and destroy the world once and for all. 

     Accordingly, many Christians today are following with rapt attention all news concerning the state of Israel, for they are sure that God will at any moment begin to take up His covenant with them once again. However, they are not even consistent with their own eschatology! By their own admission, the Jewish economy will not begin until AFTER the Gentile Age, which is to say, after the entire Church has been raptured from the earth. So watching the state of Israel to gauge the nearness of the coming of Christ is at best a futile exercise and at worst a great deception. For the Scriptures are clear that the rapture will come when men LEAST expect it (Mat 24:44) and there will be NO special signs immediately preceding it (Mat 24:6-8; 1Thes 5:3; Luke 17:26-30).

     The belief that the Jews will accept Christ in great numbers at some point in history is plagued by this gigantic fact: there is NO doctrine for it ANYWHERE in the New Testament Scriptures. Only by biased inference might one extract from this passage the idea that the Jews will return en masse to God. Why didn’t Paul say it? His progression of thought in these three chapters has come to its conclusion; if there were any appropriate moment to prophecy the salvation and restoration of the Jews as God’s people, this would be it. But no, all he says is that God is ABLE to graft the Jews back in (v23) and then defines the olive tree, the true Israel of God, as Jews and Gentiles living together in Christ.

     And that is the consistent New Testament teaching concerning physical Israel. Jesus, for instance, prophesied at length concerning the fall of Jerusalem and the Jews, yet neither did He predict the rise of national Israel to God’s favor. Instead, in dozens of parables and teachings, He ALWAYS showed the absolute end of the Jewish Covenant (ej Mat 22:1-14; Mark 12:1-10; Luke 13:6-9). Thus did He answer the disciples’ question about God restoring the Kingdom again to Israel in Acts 1:6-7. He didn’t say, “It isn’t given you to know when I will do that,” but, “It isn’t for you to know the times and seasons.” That is the vaguest of answers and leaves even the bare idea of a Jewish restoration in great doubt. It opens the door to a third possibility, that the Jews WILL be involved in end-time events, but in a diabolical, aid-to-wickedness role instead of a Godly role. While I do not subscribe to this belief, I have heard interesting arguments for it. 

     To conclude, the Apostle affirms that Israel will experience blindness until the times of the Gentiles have been completed at the end of the Age. The Jews in general will not accept Christ before He comes back to end the mystery of God.

26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

     At the close of this three chapter treatise relating Israel’s terrible record of rejecting God, does the Apostle suddenly save all those Jews he has shown were cut off? God forbid! And so all Israel shall be saved, means that all true Israel – the olive tree of elect Jews under both covenants along with the grafted-in Gentiles shall be finally gathered together into the eternal Kingdom of the Father (Mat 24:31). Excluded are the faithless Jews that rejected the Prophets, excluded are the scribes and Pharisees who condemned their Messiah to death, excluded are all who do not confess the Lord Jesus Christ (Rom 10:9-10). For a remnant according to the election of grace in Israel were indeed saved (Rom 11:5) with the Gentiles (Rom 11:11). It is appropriate that, in the middle of his explication of Israel rejecting Christ, Paul reminds us that God’s promises will not fail nor will His Word return unto Him void: All Israel will indeed be saved; but they are not all Israel which are of Israel (Rom 9:6).  

     This book has unequivocally defined the genuine Jew to be a spiritual child of Abraham by faith (Gal 3:29). But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit (Rom 2:29). Jesus told the frightfully hardened Jews who saw His miracles and yet refused to believe: If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham…ye are of your father the devil (John 8:39-44). These truths continue in force today. If any Jew does believe on Christ, the vail of blindness is taken away to see clearly the truth of the Gospel (2Cor 3:16). See my note for 11:17.

     All Israel shall be saved. Paul quotes Isaiah 45:17-25, Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation…in the Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified. While the Old Testament prophets filled their books with solemn promises of future salvation for Israel (there are probably hundreds of them), the New Testament prophets are silent on that topic. The reason should be obvious. The OT prophets prophesied of spiritual Israel, the true remnant that was gathered into the early church and has expanded to include all nations of the world just as this epistle describes. Those prophesies are not repeated for good reason – they have been fulfilled in the present Covenant of Grace offered to all men.

     There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer. Continuing to quote the prophet Isaiah, but from a different chapter, Paul describes how all the true seed of Israel is saved. The Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob (Is 59:20). The Septuagint reads Deliverer instead of Redeemer. While both titles are appropriate, Christ as the Redeemer or Ransomer of His people is an especially emotive picture of Jesus coming to the Israelite nation. The Gaal (kinsman-redeemer, Ruth 4:14) arose in Zion to give His life a ransom for many (Mat 20:28; John 12:15). Christ was the chief corner stone placed in Sion, which is the spiritual city of the living God where the saints of the Kingdom now dwell in the peace of His salvation (Rom 9:33; Heb 12:22; 1Pet 2:6). These additional verses further confirm the Apostle’s point – all the true Israel of God shall indeed be saved at His appearing and His Kingdom (2Tim 4:1), from the first to enter even unto the very last.

     For this is My covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. The quote continues in Isaiah 59:20-21, but the last phrase is drawn from an earlier chapter: Therefore shall the iniquity of Jacob be taken away; and this is his blessing, when I shall have taken away his sin (Is 27:9, LXX). The birth angel famously informed Joseph of this Messianic purpose: Thou shalt call His name JESUS: for He shall save His people from their sins (Mat 1:21). “His people” are the true spiritual Jews of all bloods, nations and races, for He hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth (Acts 17:26). The Son was manifested to take away our sins (1John 3:5). These verses again link the salvation of the Jews to the same cleansing fountain that has come to the Gentiles (Zec 13:1; Rev 21:6), the same new, better and everlasting Covenant (Heb 8:6-13; 12:24; 13:20) that Christ ratified with His own blood. Unto Him be glory…throughout all ages, world without end (Eph 3:21).

     Dispensationalists have entirely corrupted the intent of the Apostle’s quotation by changing the beginning phrase to read, “And then all Israel shall be saved.” They think that gives them license to briefly place the mind of the Apostle far into the future, in vision of another Jewish age that will be ushered in after the rapture of the Christian church. There is simply no basis for this grammatical transformation. And so, means, “Like this,” or “In this way.” The Apostle is showing how all Israel will be saved – by accepting the one and only Covenant that really can take away sins (Heb 10:1-13).

     Consider briefly the dispensationalists’ attempt to place the fulfillment of this Old Testament prophecy in the future utilizing Paul’s quotation of the prophet Isaiah: There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob. For this is My covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. This, they tell us, is Jesus saving national Israel. Yet even the briefest reading will contradict that idea at multiple points. The Deliverer has already come out of Sion and has peculiarly revealed Himself to Jacob! He has already delivered a miraculous, unimaginable way for Jacob to be justified. He has already opened My Covenant unto them and has sealed it by His own blood at Calvary. He has already taken away their sins by bearing them in His own body. Are we to ignore these extraordinary, singular events and expect some new salvation in a future age?     

     To repeat, the natural, consistent reading here is that all Israel refers to the true Israel of God (Gal 6:16). Any attempt to make it refer to Israel after the flesh will be extremely troubled, for under what construct can we possibly conceive that all natural Israel will be saved? The Bible teaches that all spiritual Israel shall truly be saved by the Deliverer taking away their sins. The underlined words are a literal word-for-word translation of this verse, except for my addition of that one word, “spiritual.” By this time the Apostle expects that we should have understood him well enough to supply that word ourselves. After all, he has said it in so many ways. Does he really expect us to insert the alternate word? And so all natural Israel shall be saved. It is either one or the other. The facts are emphatically in favor of the former.

     Finally, in support of the above, I quote Adam Clarke’s similar observation: “The national privileges of the Jews are a frequent subject of consideration; and, as these national privileges were intended to point out spiritual advantages, the terms which express them are used frequently in both these senses with no change; and it requires an attentive mind, and a proper knowledge of the analogy of faith, to discern when and where they are to be restricted exclusively to one or the other meaning, as well as where the one is intended to shadow forth the other; and where it is used as expressing what they ought to be, according to the spirit and tenor of their original calling. Multitudes of interpreters of different sects and parties have strangely mistaken both epistles (Romans and Galatians), by not attending to these most necessary, and to the unprejudiced, most obvious, distinctions and principles. Expressions which point out national privileges have been used by them to point out those which were spiritual; and merely temporal advantages or disadvantages have been used in the sense of eternal blessings or miseries.  Hence, what has been spoken of the Jews in their national capacity has been applied to the Church of God in respect to its future destiny; and thus, out of the temporal election and reprobation of the Jews, the doctrine of the irrespective and eternal election of a small part of mankind, and the unconditional and eternal reprobation of the far greater part of the human race, has been formed” (Adam Clarke for Gal 6:18).

28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes. 29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

      It is essential to identify the subject of these verses; the Jews that happen to have the blood of Abraham in their veins? Or the Jews that have the faith of Abraham in their hearts? The literal translation is: So concerning the Gospel, hated because of you; and concerning the election, beloved because of the fathers. There are no pronouns in the original, so we need to remember of whom he is speaking – not the Jews according to the flesh, but the remnant, the election out of natural Israel which accepted Christ and had their sins taken away. These were hated by their natural brothers on account of the Gospel, but beloved by God for following the faith of their fathers. They are not OUR enemies, but are enemies in the mind of natural Israel. As we saw earlier, only an elect group of Jews in the direct lineage of Jacob believed on Christ: Even so at this present time also there is (in natural Israel) a remnant according to the election of grace (Rom 11:5). These, the election from among the Jews, obtained the promises given to their fathers, and the rest were blinded (Rom 11:7).

      The holy remnant out of Israel was particularly hated by the natural Jews, who disowned them and persecuted them without mercy (1Thes 2:15; Acts 7:52), showing themselves to be enemies of the Gospel even during the time that Jesus walked the earth (Mat 23:34). Paul, along with the rest of the Apostles and many thousands of Christian Jews, were falsely accused, beaten and killed by that which is called the Circumcision (Eph 2:11).

     Some commentators have incorrectly inferred that the subject of these verses is Israel according to blood and end up advocating that all Jews are beloved of God simply because they are genetically in the line of Abraham. This idea is blatantly contrary to the Gospel and the teaching of the New Testament. Jesus Christ came to break down the middle wall between Jews and Gentiles (Eph 2:14; Rom 10:12). In the New Covenant, we are all one blood, one building, one people built upon the foundation of the Old Testament prophets and the New Testament apostles (Eph 2:20). Those who teach that God holds a special place in His heart for blood Jews reveal themselves to be either willfully obstinate or woefully ignorant of the New Testament Scriptures, which testify and establish the valid parameters to being a child of Abraham (Gal 3:29).

     For the fathers’ sakes. God fulfilled His word to the prophets and patriarchs, and He will always keep His Word and Covenants. He does not change from time to time (Num 23:19; Heb 13:8); nor is there in Him any variableness, neither shadow of turning (James 1:17). Jesus Christ came to the Jewish nation and lived as a devout Jew under the Mosaic Law; He was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers (Rom 15:8). And God’s invitation to natural Israel has not been withdrawn. If she were to confess the Christ of the Covenant, surely He would accept them again into the olive tree. The Covenant that God made with Abraham has not been set aside, nor has it been amended; in fact, the inclusion of the Gentiles was newly fulfilled in Christ (see note for Gal 3:15). However, even as the prophets of old spoke of Israel as God’s enemy for forsaking Him (Is 63:10; Mal 3:7), so it is true today. How they have labored under tribulation and curse for not faithfully following the Lord! The strange work that the prophet Isaiah spoke of has taken place, for God has risen up in wrath against the unfaithful Jews who have continuously breached His covenants with them (Is 28:16-21).   

     Of course, the promises of the Covenant will not be awarded to those who fail to keep the conditions (Ex 19:5; Heb 8:6-13). If ye hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them, that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which He sware unto thy fathers (Deut 7:12). But natural Israel did not hearken. And so God has accepted the Gentiles as actual, true Jews of the New Covenant (Php 3:3). The calling of the Gentiles was precisely foretold in God’s promise to Abraham, In thy seed shall all the nations (Gentiles) of the earth be blessed (Gen 22:18; 26:4). If a covenant between men cannot be annulled or modified, then certainly God’s covenant cannot be set aside or amended (Gal 3:15).

     Many Christians today hold the blood Jews in special honor. A personal acquaintance, citing verse 29 with Genesis 12:2, chooses to buy from Jews at the local market so that God will not curse him! Again, the New Testament teaches that the followers of Christ are true Jews and all others are imposters (see Rev 3:9). Dispensationalists love passages like Jeremiah 31:35-37, but ignore passages like Ezekiel 16:53-55. In this epistle, the Apostle gives the key to understanding and synthesizing these apparently contrasting prophecies. 

     The idea of God’s immutability must be reconciled with the hundreds of occasions where He did “change His mind.” He told the Ninevites that He was going to destroy their city in 40 days, but repented of His plan when they humbled themselves in sackcloth and ashes. Indeed, the prophets were so familiar with this trait that Jonah cited it as the reason he fled from Nineveh instead of preaching there as God had told him to do: I pray thee, O LORD, was not this my saying, when I was yet in my country? Therefore I fled before unto Tarshish: for I knew that thou art a gracious God, and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repentest thee of the evil. God “changes His mind” because His goodness and merciful are deep and wonderful. If natural Israel were to repent, without doubt God would receive them. He calls them even as before; they have not been shut out of His mercy – God hath not cast away His people which He foreknew (Rom 11:2).

     Yet, one might ask, has not God radically changed by annulling the Jewish sacrifices, rituals, and Laws of the Old Testament? No! Paul has shown, especially in this chapter, that God has taken the Jews’ unfaithfulness to Him and expanded the Covenant to a new and better Way. The literal requirements of the Old Covenant have now taken on spiritual forms, for Christ fulfilled those details of the Law and their true purpose is now being realized in the spiritual Covenant as opposed to the physical Covenant. Those types and shadows could only look forward in foreshadows of the present spiritual realities. The physical OT sacrifices for sin are now realized in the spirit, by grace through faith! The physical rituals and feasts which typify the NT truths of mercy, love, and worship, continue on but are expressed in spiritualties. The Law, sin, holiness; these remain as always. See my note for Mat 5:1.

     Likewise is the case of God’s covenants with Abraham and the Jews. The promises have come upon spiritual Israel, Abraham’s seed as determined by faith and not by blood (Gal 3:7-9; 3:14-18). For the people of the Jewish covenant are no longer the Jews by physical nature, but by the inner, spiritual nature that believing Gentiles might obtain as well (Rom 2:28-29; Rom 9:27). The blood Jews thought to themselves, “God must save us because He promised Abraham.” God answered them with a deep and unsearchable plan!

     The gifts…of God are without repentance. Some will think me a racist for saying that God has gifted the people groups of the world in different ways. Yet the proof is in the pudding! Without dispute, some of the world’s most intelligent people have been Jews (Einstein, Marx, Freud come to mind) and they continue to wield tremendous influence in world affairs (such as Facebook’s Zuckerberg, Google’s Page and Brin, moneymasters Soros and Bloomberg, supreme court justices Breyer and Kagan, etc). Nevertheless, they continue to be among the most liberal, anti-God people in the world. Many centuries ago, God said of the Jewish race, I have seen this people, and behold, it is a stiffnecked people (Deut 9:13; Ex 33:3). That refrain is repeated many times in the Bible (Neh 9:16-17; Mat 23:23-25; Acts 7:51; 1Thes 2:15), and to this very day the Jews are renowned for their general obstinacy and self-centeredness. Interestingly, these verses indicate that the Jews will continue as an identifiable race until the end of the world. See my note fore as an identifiable race until the end of the world. See my note for verse 2.

30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief: 31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. 32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.

     For centuries the Gentiles were far from God, being strangers from the covenants of promise (Eph 2:12). Now they have obtained mercy due to the disobedience of the Jews (Rom 11:20) and are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God (Eph 2:19). Wonderfully, the grace that God has extended to the Gentiles is also extended to the Jews. The Scripture hath concluded all under sin (Gal 3:22); both the Jews and the Gentiles are caught in the bonds of disobedience (unbelief). Yet God shows the depths of His great mercy by offering forgiveness and grace to all.

     Through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. The friction between Christian Jews and Gentiles was a constant challenge for the Apostles in the early church, for differences in modes of religion, life, thought and conscience ran deep. Often the exhortation is to the Jews, but here Paul appeals to the Gentiles, “Be merciful and accept your Jewish brethren of faith. Boast not against them nor think yourself better than they (Rom 11:18); be not highminded, but fear – otherwise you too will be cut off (Rom 11:20-22). One of the exhortations in this book is for Jews and Gentiles to receive ye one another (Rom 15:7).

     The word for unbelief in verses 30-32 (apeitheia) is different from the one used in verses 20-23 (apistia).

33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! 34 For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor?

     This testimony breaks forth as the Apostle closes his treatise on the new revelation that God had foreplanned to save the Gentiles and Jews together. This was a mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to His saints (Col 1:26; Rom 16:25; Eph 3:9). Job and the Psalmist proclaimed the glories of God’s works also (Job 5:9; Ps 36:6), but never has the wisdom and goodness of God so abounded as during those peerless, eventful years when the Son of God mysteriously set up a spiritual kingdom on earth which shall never end! Who among the children of men understood that the Messiah must die as the atoning sacrifice for sins? Which of the prophets grasped that God would make the Gentiles true children of Abraham with the Jews? Or that the Mosaic covenant would be recast and amended to be a New Covenant for all tribes and kindreds of the world? That the power of Satan and sin would be broken by the very Creator of the Universe coming to dwell in flesh and blood? These and many more mysteries were withheld from the knowledge of Man, but not so entirely hidden that they cannot afterwards be seen in the Old Testament Scriptures (ie Col 1:27 with Mal 1:11). For after the Spirit revealed them to the Apostles, and they in turn declared them to us, we marvel and rejoice in the surpassing wisdom and grace of God ordained from before the world began. The prophets had searched diligently to understand these mysteries the Holy Spirit was moving them to write, but they were not revealed until the fulness of time had come (1Pet 1:10-12; Gal 4:4).

     Certainly we have entered deep, unsearchable waters with the Apostle Paul in this epistle, and it is entirely appropriate to humble ourselves and acknowledge the limitless wisdom and boundless power of God. Job and his friends waxed profound as they spoke at great length of God and wisdom, but when He finally spoke, Job confessed: I have heard of Thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth Thee. Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes (Job 42:5-6). Like the prophets of old, we have enquired diligently concerning the mystery of this grace, and endeavored with all to search out His ways, but the depths of His wisdom cannot be sounded by the mind of mortal man! God told Isaiah, For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts (Is 55:7-11). He moves at the counsel of His own will alone (Jer 23:18; Is 40:13-14) and His works are beautiful and benevolent beyond comprehension! With the design of the New Covenant, He surprises us with wonders and goodness beyond comprehension and even now He is waiting and wishing to pour out from the windows of heaven a blessing so big that there is not room to receive it (Mal 3:10). Constant hearing tends to dim the spiritual marvels that God has designed for this Age of Grace.

     It is unfortunate that some commentators use these verses as a salve to cover the inconsistencies of their doctrines and theological declarations. For whenever one points out a stark Bible contradiction in the erroneous doctrines of “unconditional election” and “irresistible grace,” they are quick to say, “O, but you just cannot understand God and His ways.” That is true, of course, but Paul’s proclamation intends to marvel at the good will and action of God long hidden but now revealed. He is not saying that God’s judgments don’t make sense, or that they do not follow the normal rules of logic, but that they are marvelous and wonderful beyond our best dreams. Beginning with the unthinkable design of His Son dying in order to ransom us from Satan, the depth of His riches and wisdom surpass our imagination.

     Furthermore if, “you cannot understand God” is truly a valid argument, then we will never be able to certainly know the Truth and consequently never be able to ensure that we are not deceived. I appeal to the character of God herein proclaimed; if He truly is all-wise and all-good as the Bible affirms, then He will not, cannot, act or speak otherwise. Yet the constructs of Calvin’s doctrine describe a God who loves only the elect and forces the elect to accept Him. Will God’s thoughts and judgments actually contradict the very characteristics of Himself that He has placed in His word? May it never be. How disingenuous to invoke these verses to cover straight-up fallacies/contradictions in one’s theology!

     God has carefully created Mankind with the mental and spiritual qualities necessary to seek Him and to know Him. He has instilled in every mind those necessary first truths of logic and reason so that all have equal access to salvation. To claim that God would turn around and act contrarily to these very rules is self-defeating and absurd. Any doctrine or teaching that presents God in an un-wise or un-good manner is also un-mistakably wrong!      

     Upon this verse the Calvinist commentator Gill writes: “[No man was] present, when the book of life was made, when the names of God’s elect were put into it, and others left out…From the whole it appears, that predestination is not according to men’s works, or the foresight of them; for then these things would be plain and easy, they would not be unsearchable and past finding out; there would not be an unfathomable depth in them; the mind and counsels of God, and the springs of them, would be obvious; but it is according to his secret, sovereign, and unchangeable will.” Amazing. Gill would have us know that the reason the Calvinist idea of predestination appears so contrary to reason and Scripture is because God’s mind doesn’t follow the same logical pattern as ours; for while one would think that “men’s works” would enter into the doctrine of predestination, that would be too “plain and easy” for God’s wisdom. In other words, predestination must necessarily be illogical, otherwise we would understand God. How far that runs from the Apostle’s point!

     Following Gill’s example, the sometimes-Calvinist Adam Clarke writes, “The apostle considers the designs of God inscrutable, and his mode of governing the world incomprehensible.  His designs, schemes, and ends are all infinite, and consequently unfathomable. It is impossible to account for the dispensations either of his justice or mercy.” What? I am mystified. Why then did he spend a large portion of his life writing in explanation of God’s “mode of governing the world” and His acts of “justice and mercy” to Gentiles and Jews through the dispensations of history? Certainly we cannot sound the depths of His wisdom, justice, love and mercy, but to say they are incomprehensible is a step too far. I appreciate that Clarke goes on to write, “This epistle has been thought by some to afford proofs that God, by an eternal decree, had predestinated to eternal perdition millions of millions of human souls before they had any existence, except in his own purpose, and for no other reason but his sovereign pleasure!  But such a decree can be no more found in this book, than such a disposition in the mind of Him who is the perfection, as he is the model, of wisdom, goodness, justice, mercy, and truth.  May God save the reader from profaning his name, by suppositions at once so monstrous and absurd!” (see Clarke, v36).

35 Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again? 36 For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.

     “Who has given to Me that I must repay him?” God asked in Job 41:11. Nobody could respond. There is no man or being that has performed some work or contributed some grace such that God would say, “I owe you for that one” (see Rom 4:4). God is not obligated either to the Jew or the Gentile – they are all indebted to Him. Consequently, He is free to do as He wishes and work according to His own counsel and will. Of course, He always thinks and acts according to His perfectly good character. God is entirely just and upright in rejecting the covenant-breaking Jews and accepting the Gentiles. He is free to extend the grace of salvation to all, and whosoever will accept it shall be saved. He moves at the mind and counsel of His own perfect will. That topic was particularly addressed in chapters 8-9.

     God is the originator, sustainer and finisher of all things. In Him we live, and move, and have our being (Acts 17:28). Apart from Him was not any thing made that was made (John 1:3). That, I believe, is the Apostle’s intent in this final verse (also 1Cor 8:6). Past, present and future, all things are God’s, to do with according to His good pleasure (Php 2:13). The Lord hath made all things for Himself (Pro 16:4).

     Amen. This ends the doctrinal part of the book of Romans which has extensively investigated God’s plan for the salvation of both Jews and Gentiles in one holy people. The Apostle has powerfully shown the election of the Gentiles from before the foundation of the world, giving them now equal standing before God through the work of Christ. In fact, they are become children of Abraham with the natural Jews on account of faith in Jesus Christ. All have sinned, all are guilty. And since only through the Son of God can forgiveness and justification be found, the Jews cannot rest on God’s promises to them through Moses, nor can the Gentiles think any longer that God will overlook their failures on account of ignorance (Acts 17:30). The remaining chapters of Romans exhort and encourage this joined group to serve the Lord with all due fervor and godliness.

commentary Romans 10

1 Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. 2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. 3 For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

     This chapter begins much like the previous one. Paul sorrows for his kinsmen according to the flesh (Rom 9:1-3) and prays for their salvation, for they are seeking to be righteous by doing the works of the Law instead of seeking that righteousness which is of Faith (Rom 9:30-32). Their zeal for God had devolved into robotically adhering to rites, rules and ceremonies which were intended to be helps in seeking the God who gave them. The great stumblingstone of the Jews was that Rock of offence (Rom 9:33), Jesus Christ the Son of God, who Himself is the purpose and end of the Law (v4).

     Verse three is the text for the Calvinist claim that all Man’s righteousness is to God as filthy rags and that the man who tries to live righteously is simply establishing his own worthless righteousness instead of trusting in Christ’s righteousness, which is supposedly imputed to the elect. In their theology, Man cannot do any good work, but God does it for him. The honest reader will notice immediately however, that the topic here is the unbelieving Jews, not the sincere God-seeker. The Apostle is showing that Christ has ended the Law in favor of Faith in Him. He has fulfilled the Law (see Mat 5:17), has taken away the vail of the Old Testament (2Cor 3:14) and has revealed that wonderful salvation which the prophets of old enquired and searched diligently to understand (1Pet 1:10). Sadly, Israel chose to be ignorant of God’s wonderful deeds in sending His Son.

     The true righteousness of the Law is fulfilled by those in the New Covenant, those people of God who are walking after the Spirit and not after the flesh (Rom 8:4). The unbelieving Jews meanwhile, are ignorant of this saving righteousness and will not submit themselves to doing it (v3). They can only think of establishing their own righteousness by doing the works that the Law demands – works that can never save. For a man is not justified by the works of the Law, but by the Faith of Jesus Christ (Gal 2:16).

     This ignorance on the part of the Jews was self-induced. Israel heard but was disobedient; she knew the Truth, but refused to accept it (Rom 10:18-21). While they had the key of knowledge in their hands, they would not see Christ in it. Jesus told them, Search the Scriptures…for they are they which testify of Me (John 5:39). This deliberate ignorance continues to characterize Jews today, for the vast majority openly scoff at the idea of salvation by faith in Christ.

     Adam Clarke observes, “Where the law ends, Christ begins. The law ends with representative sacrifices; Christ begins with the real offering. The law is our schoolmaster to lead us to Christ; it cannot save, but it leaves us at His door, where alone salvation is to be found. Christ as an atoning sacrifice for sin, was the grand object of the whole sacrificial code of Moses; his passion and death were the fulfilment of its great object and design. Separate this sacrificial death of Christ from the law, and the law has no meaning, for it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins…Therefore every Jew who rejected Christ rejected salvation, and that very salvation which the law witnessed and required, and which could not be had but through Christ alone.”

5 For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them. 6 But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above🙂 7 Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.) 8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;

     Moses was the medium by which the righteousness which is of the Law came to Man, while Christ is the authority by which that Law was ended in order to award righteousness to every one that believeth (v4). The works of the Law have been abrogated in favor of Faith in Christ. The Law demanded righteous obedience to a complex and detailed system of worship and reverence such that it became his very life. The man who did so would live; the one who refused would die (Deut 30:15-16; Lev 18:5; Gal 3:12). The righteousness of Faith, on the other hand, demands allegiance to Christ (Rom 6:23). And while Moses taught that the word of the Law was near, accessible and understandable (Deut 30:12), the righteousness which is of Faith is even more readily available and understandable. Every mouth and heart can obtain it, whether Jew or Greek! However, they will never know unless they hear the Word, and that is the work of the preacher (v14-15). Yet Israel refused the Gospel they were so graciously offered, and a nation which did not know God has gained it (v18-21). This is the short summary of the chapter.

     In a remarkable passage, Moses appealed to the children of Israel just before his death, imploring them to keep His commandments and statutes which are written in this Book of the Law…See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil…therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live…for this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off. It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go up for us to heaven, and bring it unto us…neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us…but the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it (Deut 30:10-20).

     Today, to ascend into heaven or descend into the deep in search of God and truth would be to ignore Christ and His Word; that is, it would be asking Him to come back down from the heaven and teach us again. Or, as the Jews have done for the last 2000 years, continue to expect the Messiah to appear even though He has already come. We have the record of His life and death complete with the divine revelation of His mighty works. He has descended into the lower parts of the earth and He ascended into heaven. The word of Faith, or righteousness which is of Faith, is already before us, in our hearts and hands. It is nigh thee. See similar language in Psalms 139:7-8 and Proverbs 30:4.

     Some have wondered at the Apostle’s quotes in verses 6-7, which do not exactly follow the words of Moses in Deut 30:12. However, notice Paul’s words: The righteousness which is of Faith speaketh on this wise… He is not quoting Moses, but the man who lives in the Age of Grace. In other words, he uses Moses’ thought in a New Covenant application.

9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

     Paul again uses Moses’ sermon to the Jews in a New Testament application: the Word is nigh thee, even in thy heart and in thy mouth. Salvation results when the heart believes the Word, and the mouth makes confession (v10). That is the beginning of a faith relationship with Christ. The power of the Gospel unto salvation is near at hand. Believe in your deepest heart that Jesus Christ died and rose again to deliver you from Satan and sin, and thou shalt be saved. See this principle in action in Acts 16:30-33. The Apostle’s hope is that Israel would understand this near Word of Faith, and yet if anything, Jews have only increased their rejections of Jesus Christ. Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men (1Thes 2:14-15).  

     A mouth confession must precede baptism, which itself is a sign of salvation. The word confess (homologeo) carries the idea of verbally affirming a particular belief. Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him (1John 4:15). Whosoever shall confess Me before men, him shall the Son of man also confess before the angels of God (Luke 12:8). In the Scripture, homologeo is used in contexts that demonstrate an on-going, active confession. The heroes of Faith, for example, lived and died without receiving the promises, but they were persuaded of them and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth (Heb 11:13). Paul also encouraged Timothy to maintain the fight of faith, the good profession (homologeo), unto the end (1Tim 6:12).

     Man believeth unto righteousness. In other words, his belief results in him being righteous. A person who lives in sin and unrighteousness does not possess the faith that saves. They profess (homologeo)to know God; but in works they deny Him (Titus 1:16). Belief and confession must be demonstrated and proven, or else they are worthless words. The devils also believe, and tremble (James 2:19). Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous even as He is righteous. He that committeth sin is of the devil (1John 3:7-8).

     Believe and confess. According to these verses, they are necessary actions for a person to be saved. Unfortunately, many evangelical groups run off with these two words in their simplest sense and leave the rest of the Bible behind. They organize evangelistic crusades and flash tent meetings in far-off cities to get people to “believe and confess,” and then return home with their counting ledgers filled with names of the newly saved. The Apostles never left the cities they went to evangelize without organizing churches to disciple those who believed and confessed. That’s because a single profession of belief in Christ is not enough to sustain the soul on that day when the secrets of men are revealed (Rom 2:16).

     In all practicality, the term believe (pisteuo) unto righteousness (dikaiosune) is equal to the righteousness (dikaiosune) which is of faith (pistis). The latter term accents the full-grown fruit the Gospel produces in the person, while the former is focused on the beginning, the germination of the Word in the heart. This slight variance between the verb pisteuo and its nominal root pistis is not uncommon in the Scriptures. This is beautifully illustrated in Jesus’ parable of the Sower (Mat 13:1-23). See also verses 16-17.

11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

     The Old Testament prophets testified of the future opening of the Kingdom unto all people on many occasions and in brilliant detail (see note Rom 9:8). The scribes and doctors of the Law however, had a different understanding of those prophecies. Taking verses like Isaiah 60:5, they believed the Gentiles would be converted to Judaism, instead of God changing Judaism to accept the Gentiles. The truth was there to be seen in verses like Isaiah 42:6, which speaks of a Messiah for the Gentiles, but even the disciples of Christ did not understand them.

     The two present quotes are from Isaiah 28:16, which the Apostle cited earlier (Rom 9:33), and Joel 2:32. In both examples, salvation is offered to whosoever will, without distinction to genealogies. Such promises are especially beautiful to Gentile ears, in that for long years they were not a people (1Pet 2:10). Whosoever will, let him take of the water of life freely (Rev 22:17). See Rom 9:15.

      The Word of Faith, which we preach (v8), is the Gospel of Jesus Christ offered unto all men. The Kingdom of New Covenant Israel is made up nations and kindreds from all peoples of the earth – all them that believe (Rom 3:22), all that call upon Him (v12). There is now no difference between the Jew and the Greek (Rom 1:16; Gal 3:28; Col 3:11), for there is no respect of persons with God (Rom 2:10-11).

14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? 15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!

     God has designed the foolishness of preaching as the primary method of evangelism (1Cor 1:21). He has entrusted to His people the Word of Faith in order to demonstrate the truth and power of the Gospel (1Cor 2:4). The earnest, honest preachers of righteousness must go forth rightly dividing the Word of Truth, for if man must believe with the heart (Rom 10:10), then that is where the Word must be planted. Faith in Christ is based upon certain truths that cannot be visibly seen (His resurrection, the forgiveness of sins, eternal life after death, etc). The preacher’s commission is to inform men of these things in such fashion that they will believe and confess the Name of Christ.

     How beautiful to hear those glad tidings of the Gospel! The quote is from Isaiah 52:7, where the beautiful feet imply that these messengers came from afar, leaving home and loved ones for the sake of Christ and His Gospel. And how true it is! No sea has been too formidable, no mountain range too high, no threat of death too fearsome to stop the flood of missionaries that have obeyed from the heart Jesus’ words to His disciples: Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature (Mark 16:15; Mat 28:19). Many of these outstanding men and women have been forgotten on earth, but how beautiful they will be remembered in heaven! Not just by Christ, but by the souls that are there on account of their effort and sacrifice (Mark 10:28-31). Can there be any greater heavenly reward?  

     The Gospel of peace. In its deepest meaning, the message of the Gospel is how to find peace with God. See John 14:27.

16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? 17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

     Many will hear the Gospel message but will not obey. Isaiah foretold of the Jews who refused to believe in Christ in spite of His amazing miracles and signs. The arm of the Lord was mightily revealed to them, but their blinded eyes and hardened hearts refused to be converted (see John 12:37-40). And that continues to be the overwhelming case of that wicked generation (Mat 12:45) down to the present day.

     Hearing the Word demands of every person an important decision: believe or not believe. Believing leads to another decision: refuse the Truth, or by sincere confession accept it. These are the first steps of faith that result in salvation, but the remaining steps are equally important: the daily walk of doing the Truth and persevering in it unto the end. The true Faith that saves is hearing unto believing unto accepting unto doing and persevering. See note for Mat 14:31.  

     In the Greek, the verb believed (pisteuo) in verse 16 is the noun faith (pistis) in verse 17. We could translate it, “Lord, who hath come to faith by our report?” And that goes well with the Apostle’s affirmation, So then faith cometh by hearing (see note v9).

18 But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world. 19 But I say, Did not Israel know? First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.

     What about Israel after the flesh? Well, if anyone heard the Gospel it was the Jews! Jesus dedicated His life to the Jews, saying He was sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel (Mat 15:24). They refused to hear Him. So He sent out seventy disciples throughout all the land with miraculous powers to heal and cast out demons, but neither would they listen to them. And even after He had risen from the dead they would not believe the report. It is appropriate then, that Paul quotes the Psalmist as if saying, “Of course they heard! The sound of the Gospel went out into all Israel, and the Word was sent into the far corners of the land.”

     Why then, did they not obey? Did they not understand the message? The Apostle doesn’t directly answer that question here, but will do so in the next chapter (see Rom 11:7-10; Acts 13:46). The Gospels are emphatic that Israel refused to believe because their hearts and minds were blinded to the truth, which Paul also shows in Romans 9:18. See my notes for Mat 13:10-16.

     At the beginning of the Jewish religion, Moses foretold Israel’s terrible apostasy, saying that they would provoke Him to jealousy by worshiping strange gods and committing wicked abominations (Deut 32:16), until finally He would abhor them and hide His face from them and see what their end would be (Deut 32:19-20). In fact, they would so provoke Him to anger that He would move them to jealousy by creating a new people, who were not even a people; He would anger the Jews by accepting a foolish nation instead of them (Deut 32:21-24). That is an amazing prophecy on several levels.

20 But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me. 21 But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

     Israel left God even though He stretched out His hands constantly unto her, as a mother calls her child to come unto her. The Gentiles meanwhile, found a place in the Kingdom without having the Holy Scriptures and an amazing tradition of God working with them. The Jews were, and still are, a disobedient and gainsaying people. Not only do they refuse to believe in Christ, but the majority do not even believe that God exists. Driven mainly by egotism and arrogance, they continue to be contrary to all men (1Thes 2:15) and universally disliked. Remarkably, they are both the smartest race and the most morally depraved race, always at the forefront of wickedness and corruption.  

     The word gainsaying means to “talk back, dispute, disagree, refuse” (John 19:12; Acts 13:45; Titus 2:9).

commentary Romans 9

1 I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, 2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. 3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:

     Paul’s fervent affirmation, repeated in Romans 10:1, dispels any suspicion of prejudice from the Jewish quarter, for this chapter cuts to the heart of Israelite pride. While the Gentiles were Paul’s main target of ministry (Rom 11:13), his constant yearning for the salvation of his countrymen cannot be denied. Indeed, his method of evangelism was to seek out first a Jewish synagogue upon entering a new village and begin preaching there. Some notable Jews were converted under the evangelism of Paul, but the general response of Judaism was to reject the Messiah of their own Scriptures.

     The next three chapters form an emotional plea to the Jewish people to find their place in the plan of God for salvation. He has already made a strong case for them to recognize the plan of God for the salvation of all men, but here the arguments find their culmination in an earnest, final effort to persuade them to choose faith in Christ. He cites more than two dozen passages from their own Scriptures to solidify the message into a single clarion call for the Jews to turn from their blindness and be saved. And in the process, he makes an impressive argument for God’s wisdom, mercy and righteousness in adopting the Gentiles into His family.

     The so-called doctrine of election is largely drawn from several verses in this chapter, yet the general theme in which they are found should not be ignored. The Apostle is not speaking about personal salvation, but about the world-changing events which ratified the coming of the New Covenant. In truth, he is breaking some hard news to his Jewish readers! “God has rejected you as His chosen people and has elected the Gentiles because you did not seek Him in righteousness.” And then he shows from the Old Testament Scriptures that the Gentile inclusion was fore-ordained by God long before the world began.

     Paul’s virtual willingness to die in the place of his Jewish kinsmen parallels Moses’ remarkable intercession before God on behalf of the children of Israel (Ex 32:31-32). Yet, remember the Lord’s response, Whosoever hath sinned against Me, him will I blot out of My book (Ex 32:33).

4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; 5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.

     In the Old Testament, the Jews were blessed above all nations (Deut 7:6) and the Gentiles were excluded from the Covenant (Eph 2:12). They alone were favored by the adoption (Exod 4:22; Isa 1:2; Jer 31:9; Hos 11:1) and the glory, which refers to the supernatural, visible symbol of God that guided them in the wilderness and dwelt under the wings of the cherubim in the Holy of Holies (2Chr 7:1-2; Ex 40:34; Num 14:14; 1Sam 4:21). The Jews had received the covenants, first those to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and then to Moses, David, etc. Furthermore, the Law of the Old Testament had been given to their keeping by special covenant with the tribe of Levi, who were also tasked with holy temple service  (Heb 9:1, 6). Israel had been entrusted with the very oracles of God (Rom 3:2) and possessed the eternal promises given to the fathers (see Acts 3:13).

     Their greatest blessing however, was in receiving the Messiah of God, so long-promised unto Abraham (Gen 22:18) to come through the seed of Judah (Gen 49:10) and of David’s royal lineage (Is 9:6-7). And so it came to pass (Luke 1:32).

     Christ is over all, God blessed for ever. The false-doctrine teachers who believe that, somehow, Jesus Christ is not God struggle mightily to explain away this simple, direct statement. See Col 1:15.

6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. 9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son.

     In spite of her many blessings, Israel according to the flesh has fallen from God’s grace. The Jewish branches were broken off the Lord’s olive tree as Jesus had said: the Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof (Mat 21:43). Have the great promises and prophecies upon Israel contained in the Word of God failed? No! For in the New Covenant, a child of Abraham (and so a true Jew) is identified by internal, spiritual qualities instead of physical genealogies. The real Jew and man of God is revealed inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart (Rom 2:28-29).

     God’s Word concerning Israel has not failed and the promises to Abraham have not been voided; they continue valid as always. Yet a big change has taken place. The Gentiles have been offered a place in the family of Abraham by adoption, and the criteria used to be acceptably adopted is faith. This is explained at length in Galatians 3, and illustrated in the one olive tree of the Lord in chapter 11.

     The heirs of the promise then, are not the physical Jews but the spiritual children of Abraham (Gal 4:28; Eph 3:6). This we saw in the earlier chapters of Romans also, to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the Law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all (Rom 4:13-16). It is a stunning fact that some famous Bible teachers reject the idea that the promises of God to the Jews have come also upon the Gentiles. Using their words, this is “the dangerous heresy of replacement theology.” It reminds me of early Protestantism’s rejection of the “Anabaptist heresy.” Many, many of our humble, Scripture-believing Anabaptist fore-fathers were tortured and murdered by Protestants in the very name of God. The Protestants were on the wrong side of Scripture then and they are on the wrong side again here.

     The Jews by blood erred greatly in thinking they would receive ‘carte blanche’ the promises that God gave to Abraham and his seed! They thought, “God has specially chosen us to bless and multiply us exceedingly in the earth and has given us the land of Canaan forever (Gen 26:4; 13:14-16). He promised Abraham with an oath! (Gen 22:16-18). We alone are His peculiar people above all nations (Deut 14:2) and He will never break His covenant with us (Jer 33:20-26). We are eternally, unconditionally elected to be saved.” O foolish ones! God ways and mind are far beyond the limits of Man! He foreknew and pre-destinated this plan of determining who is a Jew by looking inwardly at the heart instead of at bloodlines and genealogies. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise (Gal 3:29).

     The Apostle gives the account of Abraham to demonstrate the validity of this method. For God had determined to exclude seven of Abraham’s children from the promises and extend the blessing of sonship upon the lineage of Isaac only. These were counted for the seed, even though there were other blood children of Abraham. God however, had planned to call only Isaac’s seed, “the children of Abraham.” The word of promise was to Sarah’s son (v9). And the scenario repeated in the case of Isaac’s children, Jacob and Esau. Both were sons of Isaac, yet God chose Jacob only to be the lineage of the promise. Esau and his children, although not a whit less a Jew by blood than Jacob and his children, were not counted as children of Abraham according to the promise. From Jacob onward the genealogy is inclusive, while before him it was selective.

     Later in this chapter we will see that God had deeper plans for those early blood-Jews who were not chosen, but here the point is well-made. If blood alone were indeed the only criterion in determining who is a Jew, then how could God exclude the seven sons of Abraham who each became mighty nations? The answer is obvious. Blood alone was not the way God determined who was a child of Abraham in the past and so there is no infidelity in Him for deciding that now He will determine the child of Abraham by evaluating them according to the Law of Faith (Gal 3:7-9). And that is consistent with His character, for He has always looked internally, weighing the intents and thoughts of the heart. That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ.

10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; 11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)

     Just as He had with Abraham’s children so God did with Isaac’s sons. He called Jacob, but rejected Esau. Even before the children were born, God knew their character and works, such that He could perfectly inform Rebekah of facts that would be thousands of years yet future: Two nations are in thy womb…and the elder shall serve the younger (Gen 25:22-24). God’s election of Jacob and rejection of Esau in the past demonstrates His wisdom in now electing that the children of the promise will be the spiritual children of Abraham, without respect to genealogies. For if God could include Jacob and eliminate Esau (no less a Jew than Jacob) from the promises, then He could eliminate this wicked generation (Mat 12:45) and include the Gentiles through adoption. 

     Unfortunately, some teachers have extracted these verses from their context to formulate a doctrine that is foreign to the Word of God and injurious to the character of God. We refer to the Calvinist idea of Election; that Man has no choice nor free-will and that God decides who He will save without evaluating the hearts of men. He simply chooses one and rejects the other, with no thought even to a man’s desire to be saved. That idea flies in the face of many other Scriptures, although inattentive reading of this passage might lead to said pre-mature conclusion. A diligent student of the Word will read it all, so as to rightly divide the Word of Truth (2Tim 2:15). The story is told of a Calvinist disputing his theology with a non-Calvinist, with neither being able to persuade the other. Finally the Calvinist said, “So shall I just tear Romans 9 out of the Bible?” Replied the other, “Only if you want to walk around with just one page of the Bible.”

     The book of Romans is a masterpiece in persuasion, wherein the Apostle uses the Jews’ own Scriptures to convince them that the old Covenant works-based religion had its place and purpose, but that now God has chosen a new nation and covenant based on faith in Christ. Before Jacob had a chance to prove that he was worthy, God chose him because He knew beforehand that Jacob’s good works would follow and that Esau’s sinful choices would too. Now God’s blessing falls upon a new Covenant people made up of Jews and Gentile. Those Jews who argue that God is obligated to bless them forever are hereby silenced.

     It has always been that God chooses a man by looking at his heart. So it was that God chose David when Samuel was ready to anoint Eliab. And it came to pass, when they were come, that he looked on Eliab, and said, Surely the Lord’s anointed is before Him. But the Lord said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the Lord seeth not as a man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart (1Sam 16:6-7).

     And so David counselled Solomon: My son, know thou the God of thy father, and serve Him with a perfect heart and with a willing mind: for the Lord searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts: if thou seek Him, He will be found of thee; but if thou forsake Him, He will cast thee off for ever (1Chr 28:9).

     So also did Jeremiah give God’s warning to all: I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings (Jer 17:10).

     Let us admit to a Bible “doctrine of Election” if it be demanded of us, but we will define it by using the Scriptures and not by using men’s narrow logic and flawed wisdom (1Cor 3:18-21). According to his own writings, God fore-ordained and created us to perform good works (Eph 2:10; Tit 2:14; Heb 10:24); would the Apostle here affirm the opposite? May it never be! Allow these verses their proper meaning in this context and the sense becomes clear: God’s good purpose in calling, election, covenants and all human interaction, is based on His perfect wisdom and foreknowledge. He knows exactly what is best and He will perform it. There is no unrighteousness in Him!

12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. 13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. 14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

     Here, Jacob and Esau are symbols for their respective descendants. God favored the Israelites with the covenants and the Law (v4-5), but excluded the nation of Esau. Calvinists mistakenly make Jacob and Esau personally the topic of discussion to build their doctrine of election. Yet Esau himself never served Jacob, who lived in fear of his brother for most of his life! Hear the full Scripture: I have loved you, saith the Lord. Yet ye say, Wherein hast Thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness (Mal 1:2-3). For centuries, Jacob’s descendants were chosen and blessed while Esau’s descendants were laid waste. Jacob’s descendants had the covenants, the promises and the Law, but Esau’s descendants were aliens and strangers to God.

     Adam Clarke presents a strong case for reading this chapter with this important distinction, that Jacob and Esau are representative names for the two nations they engendered. He points out that “the children” (v11) is not in the Greek and that even in the original OT passage the subject was not Jacob and Esau, but their posterity: And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger(Gen 25:23). Thus, Paul uses this example to explain God’s choice of the nation of Israel. The idea of God choosing Jacob personally is a false inference. Furthermore, that perfectly fits the topic of chapters 9-11, which is not a lesson on personal salvation, but of God’s rejection of Jews by blood and His calling and election of Jews by Faith (v24).

     Hate seems a strong word in light of verses like 1John 3:15, Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: any ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. On the other hand, Jesus warned in Luke 14:26, If any man come to Me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple. Note however, that the word hate is the natural opposite of love. There is no in-between ground here! Either our works demonstrate that we love God, or they demonstrate that we hate Him (Mat 6:24). God loves righteousness but hates evil. He hates even the excellency of Jacob if it be wicked (Amos 6:8).

     Any theology or doctrine that depicts God as unfair or capricious in loving Jacob but hating Esau must be rejected immediately. Is there unrighteousness with God? Never. He is the Rock, His work is perfect: for all His ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is He (Deut 32:4). We argued in the previous chapter that our time-less God is perfect in knowledge and wisdom; of course He knows all things before they happen! (see Rom 8:29).

15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. 16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.

     The Apostle quotes this passage to prove his answer in the previous verse, that there is no unrighteousness with God. In that occasion, God gave to Moses a sign of His highest benevolence, saying: I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy (Ex 33:19). He is all-wise and all-good, so He will always bestow mercy and compassion judiciously and fairly. Gracious is the Lord, and righteous; yea, our God is merciful (Ps 116:5); for the Lord our God is righteous in all His works which He doeth (Dan 9:14). His judgments are true and righteous (Rev 16:7). Always! His mercy and compassion is ready to be poured into the hearts of those who sincerely search for Him. He is actively looking for people who humble themselves to seek His grace (1Pet 5:5).

     Willingness of heart and full effort to win the prize are essential characteristics found in every saved person, but there is no work of Man that can earn him the grace of God. No force of will, no strength of effort is sufficient enough to acquire salvation. This we saw in chapter four. By doing good works no man (or nation) will be justified before God (see note Rom 4:5), and that’s because Man’s righteousness, being always mixed with unrighteousness, is never strong enough to obligate God to act mercifully. He decides, and nobody else (Is 40:13-14). Salvation depends entirely on God’s mercy and grace, and not upon justice or merit (Rom 11:6). No man can say, “God owes me salvation.” Or justice, or mercy. God is entirely free to bless whomsoever He chooses.

     According to the Scriptures, God is very longsuffering and patient with Man. He receives all who come to Him for spiritual healing and forgiveness of sins (John 6:37). Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved (Rom 10:13). If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins (1John 1:9). So while God alone decides when and to whom He will extend mercy, we know that He is moved by humility and faith. God’s introduction to Moses at Mount Sinai is noteworthy: And the Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, and forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth generation (Ex 34:6-7). This is how He wanted to be known. Very gracious, yet fully just. He will not clear the guilty (those who refuse to seek forgiveness and obey Him), but will show mercy and forgive the iniquities of every humbled heart.

     The Calvinist idea is that the will or disposition to be saved is foreign to all men; they are utterly depraved beasts with not even a sense to choose right or wrong. They think that God indiscriminately and randomly chooses to save certain men, and within these He puts the desire to be saved. And these cannot do else but be saved! They are irresistibly drawn and forcibly saved. These ideas do not come from the Word of Truth, but are pressed upon it.

     Abraham had made his own plans to become a father of many nations, praying, O that Ishmael might live before Thee! (Gen 17:18). But God had willed something different. Isaac too made his own plans to bless Esau when God had willed something different. God shows mercy according to His own good purpose and will. Jacob, for instance, wrestled with the Angel and refused to let go without a blessing. He was rewarded for his tenacity and perseverance!

17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. 18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

     The example of Pharaoh exhibits God’s foreknowledge and predestination, but also how He accomplishes His will even while allowing Man to act according to the freedom of his will. Pharaoh was a remarkably cruel and obstinate individual, ignoring God’s signs, miracles and divine proclamations again and again. Every time Pharaoh would humble himself and ask for mercy, God would relent, but his constant rebellions led directly to his death in the Red Sea. While God did harden Pharaoh’s heart, he did so indirectly, bringing events and experiences into his life that led him to the decision point. If Pharaoh would have humbled his heart as the king of Nineveh did (Jonah 3:4-10), surely God would have had mercy. Yet, He knew from the beginning that Pharaoh would not listen.

     In that way God extended mercy to Moses and the Israelites (v15), but hardened Pharaoh and the Egyptians (v17). And the next chapters describe a similar case, how that God blinded physical Israel and accepted the Gentiles because of the Jew’s constant unbelief and wickedness (Rom 11:7-8). Again, He did not hardened their hearts directly, but brought events and experiences into their lives that would either cause them to serve Him more fully, or would provoke them to reject Him more and more. Jesus taught this principle in Mat 13:12 and Mat 25:29. God doesn’t want half-hearted followers (Rev 3:15-16). In His infinite wisdom and power, He ever acts with Man. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on [the Jews] which fell, severity; but toward [the grafted-in Gentiles], goodness, if thou continue in His goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off (Rom 11:22). This is Paul’s point here.

     The Calvinistic view of God’s interaction with Man is fatalistic and spirit-crushing. God becomes an ogre who saves arbitrarily, extending forgiveness to men who have not asked for it and damning others who seek His favor. Read in a certain way, these verses could be used to support Calvin’s theology, but there is a far better and Scripturally-consistent view which we have advanced throughout these notes. Rather than creating human robots that move at His command, God’s technique is a masterful, undetected maneuvering of events and experiences to construct a marvelous, spiritual Edifice. In this life we will never completely understand the multi-fold manners and designs whereby God directs human affair, but we can glimpse His hand at work in the history of the world! Why did God warn Joseph in a dream to take Jesus into Egypt instead of simply ending the wicked Herod’s life a few years early? Why did He allow John the Baptist to languish in prison and then suffer a sudden and ignominious death? We don’t have the answers. Shall we that are formed say to Him, Why hast thou made me thus?

     I imagine God looking down from His heaven and building an eternal temple with human souls (Eph 2:19-22). He chooses this stone for one purpose and another stone for that particular place. He always selects the correct stone for its best-suited purpose because He knows each one intimately. He considers beforehand every mark of imperfection and nobility, every character weakness and strength. For while those features are unknown to beings confined to time, they are openly clear to Him who is outside of Time. Some stones are hard and unworkable, others He can shape and sand such that they shine even better in their God-given place in His temple.

19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? 20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? 21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

     Some argue that they are not accountable for their actions: “If God sends events into my life that result in me doing what He wished, then how can He blame me? He knew what would happen! Who can resist His will?” See this flawed argument in Rom 3:5-7 also. The point is dead-ended, for God does extend mercy to every person who asks in humility. If He finds fault with a man, we are sure it is for good reason. God will not act contrary to His character. He cannot lie (Titus 1:2) nor deny Himself (2Tim 2:13), so if we ask He will forgive (1John 1:9).

     How unreasonable for the clay to question the potter and refuse to accomplish the purpose for which it was created! Equally unreasonable it is for a man to question God’s reasons for creating us the way He did (read Is 45:9-11 in the LXX). The Creator deserves our reverence and meekness. But now, O Lord, thou art our Father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of Thy hand (Is 64:8). Can the clay understand the Potter? Does He not have the right to make of the clay whatsoever vessel He wishes? A house contains a large variety of vessels, each with special design and purpose; some are made of gold and silver, others of wood and earth, some are used in formal settings, others fulfill menial tasks (2Tim 2:20). Everyone who humbles himself to be shaped and purged by the Potter shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the Master’s use, and prepared unto every good work (2Tim 2:21).

     The Potter and clay analogy is particularly relevant to the Apostle’s larger subject of God’s plan for Jews and Gentiles in the New Covenant of grace. God was patient with the vessels of wrath (v22) and did not re-mold the clay immediately, even though He had fore-ordained to bestow the riches of His glory upon the vessels of mercy (v23). It is a not-so-subtle reminder to the Jews of an unmistakable prophecy concerning the nation of Israel. Behold, as the clay is in the potter’s hand, so are ye in Mine hand, O house of Israel….If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them…But if it do evil in My sight, that it obey not My voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them (Jer 18:1-10). Yet Israel did not obey, and the clay was marred in the hand of the Potter: so He made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the Potter to make it (Jer 18:4).

     We must remain within the analogy’s domain of good purpose and application. While the picture of God shaping a man (or people) to His purpose is beautiful and inspiring, Man is much more than clay. Clay has no mind, so it is impossible for it to talk back to its maker, much less refuse the work it was created to do. Rather, the analogy intends to demonstrate the impropriety of Man questioning the designs and plans of the Creator, yet this is a common human tendency across all people groups! The atheist/agnostic impugns God’s character by criticizing His creative hand and the Christian is often tempted to question/doubt God’s goodness when he encounters difficulties and strife (see Rom 8:35). It is an important lesson to learn. Allow God to be in control of your life and He will wisely administer events and circumstances so that your character and being are shaped to His good pleasure. Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that He may exalt you in due time (1Pet 5:6; James 4:10). He wants to make of us a name and a praise among all people of the earth (Zeph 3:20). Will we let Him?

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction: 23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory, 24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

     For long years God “waited” for the right moment to make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, those foreknown, predestinated and called children of Abraham according to Faith (Gal 3:7). He endured with much longsuffering the rebellions of the children of Abraham according to the Flesh – those vessels of wrath fitted to destruction – even though He was minded to act in righteousness immediately. Perhaps God could have arranged a different plan, but should we the clay be questioning the mind of the Potter? The beautiful truth is, the Gentiles in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy (1Pet 2:10).

     The New Covenant people of God are the called according to the law of Faith, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles. Together they are one people (Eph 2:14), branches of the same olive tree (Rom 11:24), a chosen generation and an holy nation (1Pet 2:9), children of the living God (v26). This did not just happen, it was foreknown and predestinated by God and that should testify powerfully to Jews and Gentiles.

25 As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved. 26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God.

     This tremendous prophecy from the book of Hosea foretells the Gentile inclusion into God’s Covenant with Man. There are many similar foretellings in the Old Testament. See especially Isaiah 54, which is an intricate prophecy of the barren woman (the Gentiles) rejoicing at being accepted at last.

     The larger prophecy in the first chapter of Hosea parallels Paul’s theme in these chapters. God told Hosea to prophecy of the imminent end of the kingdom of the house of Israel, for He would no more have mercy upon them. He would show mercy to the house of Judah and save them, but Israel? I will utterly take them away. Yet (He continues) the number of the children of Israel (not Judah) shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not My people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God (see Hos 1:4-11).

     Historians have long speculated what happened to the people of Israel, the so-called “ten lost tribes” who the Assyrians defeated in battle and carried into captivity about 150 years before the fall of Judah to the Babylonians. Whatever their story, they were so completely dispersed among the surrounding nations, and their blood so inter-mingled with them, that they ceased to be a people. They must be called “Gentiles.” Yet, the Word of the Lord by the prophet Hosea says these same people, the children of Israel, would become like the sand of the sea for number and be called the children of the living God.   

27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved: 28 For he will finish the work, and cut it short in righteousness: because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth.

     This prophecy from Isaiah 10:20-23 foretells a great and thorough purging in the land of Israel, which was fulfilled in John the Baptist (see Mat 3:7-12). While Hosea prophesied a tremendous increase in the children of God, Isaiah says that only a remnant shall be saved. The establishing events of the New Testament demonstrate the veracity of both prophecies. For in truth, the great majority of Jews rejected Jesus the Nazarene and only a small remnant emerged out of Israel and believed on Him unto salvation (Rom 11:5). The larger field of converts were Gentile children of Abraham, which have grown to far outnumber the Jews.

     A short work will the Lord make upon the earth. This quotes the Septuagint version of Isaiah 10:23, a statement which has been seemingly contradicted by time, seeing that the world continues on 2000 years after the Apostle Paul wrote these words. Two facts will give better understanding. First, the prophet’s subject is the Israel of the Old Covenant, a work which God finished with the coming of the Messiah (Heb 9:26). Second, the Greek the phrase, short work, mirrors the earlier phrase, cut it short (both verb forms) and refers to a quick cutting off, or making a sudden end of things. Significantly, it is found in the Septuagint in only two other passages (Is 28:22; Dan 9:24-26), the latter one in Daniel’s remarkable prophecy of the end of the Old Covenant by the Messiah’s hand.

29 And as Esaias said before, Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha.

     In the quoted verse, Isaiah was warning Judah of her grave spiritual condition just before Jerusalem fell to the armies of Nebuchadnezzar, who carried the surviving Jews into captivity in Babylon for seventy long years. The pattern would repeat some 500 years later. Judah was in such grave and hardened spiritual condition that Jesus said Tyre and Sidon would have repented in sackcloth and ashes if He had done such mighty works in their cities, and that Sodom would have even remained to that day (see Mat 11:20-24). Because of their hardened and unbelieving hearts, the city of Jerusalem was completely destroyed and all survivors were led into slavery twice in the space of 70 years. The pride of the Jews, the Temple on Zion’s hill, would be so utterly demolished that the Roman conquerors ran a plow over the grounds to demonstrate its shocking destruction.

     Yet, thanks to God, a very small remnant (Is 1:9) escaped from the house of Jacob (Is 10:20) to become the Messiah’s New Covenant people. A time of great trouble shook the nation of Judah and thoroughly purged it. The honorable and willing were delivered, and the rest were scattered throughout the nations even to the present day (Eze 5:12-15). The end of this Age will see a similar great purging and deliverance of the people of God (Dan 12:1-3).

30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith. 31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.

     Until the coming of Christ, the Gentiles were aliens and strangers from the Law and the Covenant, and without God in the world (Eph 2:12). Nevertheless, without seeking for it (Rom 10:20) they received the righteousness of faith (Rom 4:13) as the spiritual children of Abraham. Israel after the flesh meanwhile, was so engrossed in following their Law of righteousness that they missed their King of Righteousness (Is 32:1; Heb 7:2).

     What shall we say then?  The Greek phrase occurs six times in the book of Romans, but nowhere else in the Scriptures. It marks the beginning of a new point, a step forward in the argument for the New Covenant people of God. And the ransomed of the Lord shall return, and come to Zion with songs and everlasting joy upon their heads: they shall obtain joy and gladness, and sorrow and sighing shall flee away (Is 35:10). 

32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone; 33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.

     Israel after the flesh failed to obtain the promises (Rom 11:7) because they did not believe on their Savior, Jesus Christ. They trusted solely upon doing the works of the Law, which they had modified and remolded to their liking. They couldn’t see that it had become to them a broken reed…whereon if a man lean, it will go into his hand, and pierce it (Is 36:6). By refusing the Giver of the Law, the Jews stumbled over that Rock of offence (1Pet 2:8; Is 8:14). He did not fulfill their dreams for a Messiah (1Cor 1:23). But a remnant, or seed, did believe on Him, and together with the Gentiles of faith, these received the promises. The very Stone that the Jews had stumbled upon was the cause of Gentile salvation (1Pet 2:6). Simeon prophesied that Mary’s child would cause this great division in Israel (Luke 2:34).

     Two prophecies of Isaiah are combined in this quotation. The first is Isaiah 8:14-15, And He shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And many among them shall stumble, and fall, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken. And the second is Isaiah 28:16, Therefore thus saith the Lord, Behold I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste (or, be confounded, LXX). These verses must have pricked the consciences of those faith-less Jews who had them in memory. Peter used this passage in his fearless defence of Christ before the Sanhedrim (Acts 4:10-13), and Jesus cited a similar prophecy from Psalms 118:22 (see Mat 21:42).

     Paul will return to the subject of the Jews stumbling over Christ in the last of this three-chapter treatise (see Rom 11:11), in which Israel after the flesh is shown to be a work finished and cut short (v28). The new Israel of God is made up of Jews and Gentiles together as one people in the Lord.

commentary Romans 8

1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

     These verses extend the topic of the previous chapter, which described the desperate situation of the good-intentioned person who wants to serve God but keeps doing sinful things. Thus, the Apostle continues in first person concerning those two laws which war within the soul (Rom 7:25); the one is fleshly and the other is spiritual. Their titles vary throughout these chapters. Here, the Law of the Covenant of Grace is called the Law of the Spirit of life (v2), and elsewhere it is the Law of Faith (Rom 3:27) and the Law of God (Rom 7:25). The fleshly law is here called the law of sin and death (v2); elsewhere we read, the law of sin (Rom 7:25).

     While the Apostle’s chief intent in these chapters is to convince the Jews to put all their faith in Christ and break completely from the Mosaic Law just as he had done (Php 3:4-8), his words also depict in clarity that the human condition of self-love and rebellion can only be overcome by the power of the Holy Spirit within the believer. All those under the Law and without the Law are under condemnation, but Jesus Christ came to deliver Mankind from the body of this death (Rom 7:24). The blessedness of the New Covenant of Grace is that the believer is in Christ and the Spirit of God dwells within; he is forgiven, cleansed, sanctified, and shall not come into condemnation (John 5:24). The fullness of Faith in the believer will result in more Grace from God, which leads to even deeper faith and more grace – an ever-increasing circle of spiritual Power.

     The Law of the Spirit is able to set Mankind free from the Law of sin and death (see note Rom 6:18). This all-encompassing Law which has come to crush all mankind is prominent throughout the Scriptures: In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die (Gen 2:17); the soul that sinneth, it shall die (Eze 18:4); If ye live after the flesh, ye shall die (Rom 8:13). The Law of Moses figured large in this case, for while it was ordained to life it actually wrought death by sin (Rom 7:10) to all who attempted to follow its just commands. Nevertheless, many Christian Jews put their confidence in the flesh, or the Mosaic Law that Paul had realized he must completely renounce in order to win Christ (Php 3:3-4). Therefore he says elsewhere, Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage (Gal 5:1).

     The Apostle has shown that the Mosaic Law leads to sin and death, but this passage speaks to the Gentile Christian as much as the Jewish one. The carnally minded (v6) consist of all those outside of Christ. The Gentiles are also guilty before God, not by the Mosaic Law, but by disobeying the Law of their conscience. But thanks be to God, Christ and His Law of the Spirit has provided a way to be set free from these tyrants.

3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

     Although the Law of Moses was thoroughly righteous and holy (Rom 7:12; 9:31), it did not have the spiritual power to veritably cleanse a soul from the stains of sin. Lacking as yet the acceptable atonement, God prescribed special interim rituals which would release the offerant from guilt. Sins were forgiven under the Old Covenant, but in a pre-active manner, that is, conditioned upon a future event which God recognized in perfect foreknowledge. Thus, the Lord was ready to forgive the penitential prayer (Ps 86:5) and He put away David’s sin so that he did not die (2Sam 12:13).

     Nevertheless, this weakness of the Law to actually take away sins signified a limitation in the relationship between God and His creation which was finally removed by the Atonement of Christ. The result was the blessed coming of the Holy Spirit into the hearts and minds of every believer. In the Old Testament, the Spirit came and went as God deemed best, but in the New Testament, He comes into our hearts to stay (John 16:7). Crucially here the Law was weak, but Jesus Christ effected tremendous steps in reconciling Mankind with his Creator. The new Temple of God is within the hearts of His cleansed and forgiven  people.

     In these chapters the apostle Paul has delicately and astutely placed his arguments before the Jews (see note Rom 7:12), for with his whole being he wants them to be saved (Rom 9:3). He has readily identified himself as a Jew in order to save the Jews (see 1Cor 9:19-23). Elsewhere however, he speaks more emphatically about the Law, saying that it was disanulled because of this very inability to make its adherents perfect (Heb 7:18-19).

     Adam Clarke writes, “The law was a spirit of death, by which those who were under it were bound down, because of their sin, to condemnation and death…The law could not pardon; the law could not sanctify; the law could not dispense with its own requisitions.” I believe this overstates the case unto making the Law an unnecessary evil. In truth, the Law was ordained by God so that Man could truly and effectively find right-standing with Him. Pardon was extended to those under the Law. Guilt was released by doing the statutes of the Law. Favor and blessing flowed to those who honored the Law. Incredible testimonies abound in the era of the Law. The focus is rather upon this crucial fact: the Law was incomplete without the perfect atonement of Christ. Now that He has effected that offering, the era of the Law has ended. A new and living way has been opened into the Holy Place (Heb 10:20). That is a primary theme in the epistle to the Hebrews.

     Jesus came to the world in the likeness of sinful flesh. This phrase exhibits in remarkable clarity the deity and humanity of Jesus. He was wholly human (sinful flesh) but in likeness (not real essence), for He is God’s own Son. He was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14), made in the likeness of men (Php 2:7), a partaker of flesh and blood (Heb 2:14), in fashion as a man (Php 2:8), in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin (Heb 4:15). Jesus appeared as any normal man and lived in all points as any normal man, but the above verses show that his Being was not human. Thus, He was made flesh, in fashion and likeness a man. Yet in reality, He is the divine Son of God, the Christ. God was manifest in the flesh (1Tim 3:16). Jesus said, he that hath seen Me hath seen the Father (John 14:9). See note on Col 1:15.

     The first man Adam disobeyed God and sin suddenly appeared in the world; the last Adam perfectly obeyed God and so condemned sin in the flesh. He overcame sin, defeated sin, destroyed sin. Obviously, sin still exists, but the power of sin has been broken for we who trust in Christ, and on that final day our fleshly bodies will be raised to life celestial, eternal and incorruptible. The prince of this world has been judged, condemned and cast out (John 12:31).

     God sent his Son for sin. The NIV and NASB translators dubiously add to the Apostle’s words here. “God sent his Son to be a sin offering.” While God did make His soul an offering for sin (Is 53:10), the aim of this verse is that Jesus, living in the likeness of sinful flesh, condemned sin by His perfect and sinless life. That crucial virtue made Him to be the acceptable offering for sin. Jesus came to this world for sin. Those words carry a considerable weight of meaning which encompasses the plan of God in the reconciliation of Mankind.       

     Was Jesus a human after the order of historical fallen Mankind, or was He a human after the form of Adam’s pre-fallen state? See note on Rom 5:13.

4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

     The Greek word dikaioma is not normally translated righteousness, but “precept, statute, judgment” (see note Rom 5:18). This spotlights the fact that while the precepts and statutes of the Law were beautifully designed and initiated by God, they did not make anybody perfect in the Old Covenant economy (Heb 7:19). Rather, they were completed, fulfilled, accomplished in the details of the New Covenant of Jesus Christ. Or as the Apostle says later on, Christ is the end of the Law for righteousness to every one that believeth (Rom 10:4). The types and shadows of the Law all pointed to a better hope which would even more clearly validate and fulfill the designs of Law (Mat 5:17). And after His resurrection Jesus opened the eyes of His disciples to those truths such that their hearts burned within them (Luke 24:27, 32).

    So the statutes and decrees of the Law were fulfilled in us who walk…after the Spirit. Their finishing touch was designed to come into focus in the Messiah’s Kingdom within you (Luke 17:21). A concise commentary on this truth can be found after the lengthy list of Old Testament heroes of faith: And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise: God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect (Heb 11:39-40). The righteousness of the Mosaic Law came to its intended end in the new Law of Christ.

5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. 6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. 7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

     The human mind is the battleground of good and evil. It was there that Satan insinuated his pernicious thoughts to Eve and there that Adam decided to rebel against God’s command. According to James 1:14-15, sin is first conceived in the mind. In fact, the most damaging sins for the individual might not even be made known. Lust, envy, hatred, unforgiveness, bitterness, pride, arrogance, these are conceived and cultivated virtually sight-unseen in the mind. They are death to the soul! The Apostle depicts the scene in two contrasting patterns: “To think and live according to the Flesh is to be an enemy of God and results in spiritual death; to think and live according to the Spirit is to submit to the Law of God and results in life and peace.” A simple axiom with grave consequences. 

     In this chapter, the carnal mind adds to a growing list of terms for the unsaved natural man: the old man, the body of sin, the flesh (chap 6). The words carnal and flesh are derived from the same Greek word (sarx). The carnal mind will never submit to the law of God. It must be put to death, destroyed, crucified (Rom 6:6); then the mind can be transformed, renewed, reborn (Rom 12:2; 2Cor 5:17) according to the graces of the Spirit. This is not a single divine action, but a sanctifying, maturing process while in this earthy tabernacle of clay. The true seeker must take up his cross daily (Luke 9:23), must die daily (1Cor 15:31), must offer himself in constant living sacrifice to God (Rom 12:1). He must live in the flesh (Gal 2:20; John 17:15) yet never take in mind the things of the flesh (v5). This battle in the mind – flesh against the spirit – is deathly serious. The spirit indeed is willing but the flesh is weak (Mat 26:41).  

     Only the spiritually minded person can know true life and peace, for the soul that has been made alive by the Holy Spirit is able to discern things that the natural man cannot (1Cor 2:14-15). And the inner peace (see John 14:27) that attends this man in Christ is beyond understanding (Php 4:7). The verses that follow show that to walk after and mind the things of the Spirit requires full commitment and serious effort. We are debtors to live according to the Spirit (v12); we must mortify the deeds of the body (v13); we must allow ourselves to be led by the Spirit of God (v14). God alone can literally purify a human soul, but Man press hard to receive that grace (2Tim 2:1; Luke 16:16). This fact is everywhere evident in the New Testament yet many theologians deny that Man has any work in the effecting of his salvation. Strive to enter in at the strait gate, Jesus said, For many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able (Luke 13:24). They were not willing to give up all and utterly die to Self to win that pearl of great price (Mark 8:34; Mat 13:46) Every man… purifieth himself (1John 3:3); not the actual action, but maintaining the mind of decision and sincerity to yield himself to wholly to Christ. Thus we read that the saints in heaven have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb (Rev 7:14). Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts (James 4:8).

     There is some dispute whether the word Spirit in this passage is a reference to the Holy Spirit, or to the spirit within the individual. To my mind, the translators were entirely correct in capitalizing the word Spirit here. In verse 10 however, the subject seems to require a lower-case “S.” The previous verses spoke of the mind as if it were the spirit of the person (see Rom 7:23-25), but here the Holy Spirit is the primary subject.

8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. 9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. 10 And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

     Again the picture is black and white. We are either in the flesh, or we are in the Spirit. Meaning, we are either living according to the will and desires of the Flesh, or according to the will and desires of the Holy Spirit. We are either in Christ, or we are none of His. We are either a living branch connected to the Vine (John 15:5), or a dead one destined to be burned (John 15:6). That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit (John 3:6). The man who is in flesh will display the selfish deeds of the flesh, while the man who is in the Spirit will display the honorable fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5:22-23).

     This either/or dichotomy concludes in verse ten: either the body is dead and the spirit is alive, or the body is alive and the spirit is dead. There are no other options and no middle ground because there are only two destinies. See note for Rom 6:2. The body (soma) and the flesh (sarx) are used synonymously in reference to the natural man’s fallen nature. Obviously the body is not physically dead when Christ comes to live within (1Cor 6:19), however, the selfish desires of the body must be put to death. In Rom 7:24, it is the body of this death.

     In verse ten, the KJV incorrectly capitalizes the word, spirit. For while the Holy Spirit could be characterized as life, the other half of the either/or arrangement reveals the subject to be the human individual. When the Trinity makes His abode in the person (John 14:16, 23) the soul/spirit is quickened, or made alive, but the body is not reborn until the last day. Jesus said, It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing (John 6:63). Meaning, apparently, that God communicates and draws His human creation by spiritual methods as opposed to fleshly methods. No good thing dwells in the flesh (Rom 7:18). 

     So at the new birth, the spirit of the individual is made alive because of righteousness. God does not quicken the spirit/soul of arbitrary individuals, but by careful election He hath raised us up…to sit together in heavenly places (Eph 2:6). The link between personal righteousness and salvation is a thread that runs all through the book of Romans (see Rom 3:22; 4:13; 5:21; 6:13; 10:10; 14:17).

     The triple reference to the Spirit in verse nine makes an interesting allusion to the Tri-une God who is a Spirit (John 4:24). Note: the Spirit…the Spirit of God…the Spirit of Christ.

11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

     Even the mortal bodies of the saints will one day be made alive, but in order to experience Heaven, the resurrection of the spirit and soul must precede it (Rev 20:6). The resurrection of the body is the last step of Redemption (more in v23). The three parts of man will all “die,” but Christ is able to quicken them as a new creature. The soul and spirit die spiritually when a man commits sin, but they are made alive by the healing power of Christ (v10) at the new birth. The body though, is conceived in sin and entirely infected by this death-corrupted world. It is not made alive by Christ, but must be kept under and subjected (1Cor 9:27) until the final breath is drawn. At death, the souls and spirits of the saints go to be with the Lord, but their bodies remain in the grave until the end of the world, when at the sound of the Last Trump, they too will be quickened and reunited with the soul and spirit. See notes on 1Cor 15

     The body of death, or carnal mind, is that fallen, depraved part of man which he has naturally on account of being born into this world of sin. However, each man is also born with an untarnished soul, a moral conscience and the honest abilities to think, comprehend and choose. By his own sin, his soul and spirit will die, for all have sinned. The two natures are in stark contrast – the fleshly, selfish nature is constantly impulsing the person to follow its mind, and the Godward spiritual nature calls the person to follow its mind. See notes at Rom 5:12; 6:23; 7:14.

12 Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh. 13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.

     Seeing that Christ has quickened our spirits (v10) and has also promised to quicken our mortal bodies (v11), we are debtors to Him – under obligation to obey His law and follow the rule of the Spirit (v14). On the other hand, we have no debt to the Flesh, for it is not made alive upon being born again and instead must be mortified daily (v13). The word debtor (see Gal 5:3) implies an outstanding bill or obligation. Man’s debt of sin can only be paid by Christ, but his indebtedness remains – not to the Flesh, but to Christ. This is illustrated in the parable of the ungrateful servant in Mat 18:21-35, where the benevolent Lord re-imposed the great debt He had forgiven when the servant did not follow His good example. 

     Mortify the deeds of the body. We are debtors to Christ and this is what He has asked us to do. To mortify (thanatoo) is to put to death (see same word used in 1Pet 3:18). This requirement of every believer, all the sons of God, has been strongly shown in the book of Romans. See especially notes on Rom 6:2; 7:24.

14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

     The Holy Spirit dwells in the heart of every born-again person (Rom 8:9), but He does not take over control of the mind, will and actions of the believer. Only those that are led by the Spirit…are the sons of God. The Holy Spirit was sent by Christ to be a Guide for His followers during their earthly sojourn (John 16:13; John 15:26). In a beautiful Old Testament type, the children of Israel were guided through the wilderness by a pillar of cloud during the day and a pillar of fire by night (Ex 13:21; Neh 9:19). Those who did not follow the Pillar were not children of Israel.

     While the Old Testament experience was closely linked to the physical, the New Testament is a spiritual economy. The work of the Spirit is not literally going before the people of God on an earthly track through the desert. Rather, His primary work is to declare Christ, to illuminate the truth of the Gospel and to lead the Christian into closer communion with God (v26, John 14:26). The Christian must be led by the Spirit (Eph 4:30; 1Thes 5:19), he must relinquish his own will, deny his own desires, reject his own paths and follow the Spirit of Truth.

15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.

     The coming of the Holy Spirit to live in the heart of the believer is the great difference between the Old and New Covenants. Of course, the Spirit’s coming was only possible because of the tremendous work of atonement that Christ achieved in the likeness of sinful flesh (Rom 8:3). Under the Old Covenant, the Spirit’s work on earth was limited to particular individuals or particular times. In the New Testament, the Spirit has been made available personally to all who yield themselves to His rule (Acts 2:17). Jesus said it was better for Him to go away, for then the Comforter would come to abide with you forever (John 16:7; 14:16). The presence of the Holy Spirit in each believer is an incredible, new step for close communion with God, for He makes intercession for our infirmities before God (v26).

     These verses are repeated in Gal 4:5-6. The spirit of bondage apparently refers to the Old Covenant, as in Galatians 5:1. It is characterized as fearful (similar in Heb 2:15; 2Tim 1:7) because its high and holy laws were strictly enforced to the full measure. He that transgressed the Law perished without remedy (see my note at Mat 7:28; Heb 10:28; James 2:10; Rom 3:20). Under the New Covenant and because of Christ, mercy rejoiceth against judgment (James 2:13) and all those who accept His requisites are extended the blessed privilege of adoption into the family of God (John 1:12; 1John 3:1-2).

     In the original language, Abba, Father (abba pater) is the word “father” repeated in Hebrew and Greek (also in Gal 4:6; Mark 14:36). Perhaps this is said to remind again that God is no respecter of persons (Rom 2:10-11), being the Father of both Jews and Gentiles (Eph 4:6). Yet the more significant meaning is to develop the comparison of the two covenants – slaves in fear and bondage, or sons of love by adoption. Of course, in one sense we are slaves of Christ (Rom 1:1), yet voluntary ones. And in one sense we do fear God (Heb 12:28; Php 2:12), yet in respect and reverence.      

     Very rarely is God presented as our Father in the Old Testament and even then it is only in prophetic passages such as Isaiah 56:5; 64:8. Jesus, meanwhile, referred to God as our Father more than a dozen times in the Sermon on the Mount alone. God created Man and so can be considered his father in a material sense (Luke 3:38), but only those who are led by the Spirit are true, accepted children of God (1John 3:10) in a spiritual sense. Outwardly they appear as all other men, but inwardly they have received the Spirit of adoption (see Eph 1:5), which remains within until the day of full adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body, is realized (Rom 8:23).

16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:

     The Spirit testifies together with our spirit to evidence that we are truly children of God. While the Spirit does speak to Man’s spirit, here the Greek verb means to testify jointly, or along with something. The tree is known by its fruit, so also the man (Mat 7:16-20). Does he bear the fruit of the Spirit, or the thorns and thistles of the flesh? In my mind then, this verse is not saying that the Holy Spirit is constantly testifying to our own spirit that we are children of God, but rather that the joint testimony of the Spirit with our own renewed spirit (Eph 4:23; Rom 12:2) shows us to be the children of God. This renewing of the Holy Ghost (Tit 3:5; 1John 5:10) results in true adoption as sons and daughters of God.  

     Unfortunately, some have virtually elevated the Spirit to the throne of worship instead of Jesus Christ, who is alone the Author and Finisher of our salvation (Heb 12:2). Yes, the Spirit is the seal of our salvation (Eph 1:13; 2Cor 1:22), but His role is to exalt Christ, not Himself (John 16:13). He ever points the seeking soul to the One with power to heal, save and advocate (1John 2:1). Obsessions with seeking certain gifts of the Spirit instead developing the full fruit of the Spirit has crippled the Gospel in many cases! The Holy Spirit will always guide by the light of the Word and by this we recognize the true Spirit of God (1John 4:1; 1Tim 4:1).

17 And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together. 18 For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.

     What a marvelous, generous promise! God wants to gift us with amazing, eternal glories. The very idea of God adopting a human is incredible. Yet if we are being led by the Spirit we are truly and legally sons of God (v14), which makes us heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ. Jesus, of course, is the Son of God by nature, but we are sons of God by adoption. And just as God raised up Christ, so He will also raise up our mortal bodies at the Last Day (v11). In an interesting type, the Levites were not given land in Canaan, for the Lord is their inheritance (Deut 18:2; Num 18:20).

     Do not miss the subtle warning in this verse. We are children and heirs, if so be that we suffer with Him. Indeed, we must die with Him if we wish to live with Him; we must suffer with Him if we wish to reign with Him (2Tim 2:11-12; Rom 6:8; 2Cor 4:10). Yet our present, passing sufferings are minor afflictions in comparison to the wonderful, everlasting glories which have been prepared for us (1Cor 2:9; 2Cor 4:17). The difference is so great that Peter even says we should rejoice in suffering with Christ (1Pet 4:13). And Jesus promised that everyone who suffers for the sake of His name shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life (Mat 19:29).

     The word sufferings (pathema) extends to both physical and spiritual trials – hardships, pains, emotional struggles, denying one’s personal affections, etc (Gal 5:24; Php 3:10; Heb 2:10; 1Pet 5:9). The martyrs gave up their lives in order to experience that future glory, but the great trials and temptations of the present age of deception are no less a severe, to-the-death test of suffering! The Prophet warned of exceedingly difficult days at the End, such that even the elect might be deceived (Mat 24:21-25). Let us not be tranquilized by the soothing sounds of pleasure and ease. The Devil knows what he is doing! He is sweeping far more into the horrors of Hell by inflicting spiritual sufferings than He did by inflicting physical sufferings.

     The glory that we will begin to experience in that Day is beyond human comprehension. Our mortal bodies will be transformed into celestial bodies (1Cor 15:52; Php 3:21) and we shall be able to see Him in full view and understanding (1John 3:2). That glory will be revealed in us

19 For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. 20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, 21 Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

     The word creature (ktsis) refers to the creation of God, the physical world with its features and creatures. According to God’s word, Adam died spiritually the moment that he disobeyed God and ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Gen 2:17). Sin, decay and death, foreign to the Creation until that point, became the rigid rule of all things. The whole creation was made subject to vanity, or put under the bondage of corruption (v21). In other words, the physical laws of entropy, order-to-chaos and decay were imposed by God immediately after Adam disobeyed, for when Adam sinned, God cursed the ground (Gen 3:17). The word ground (adamah, ge), in both the Hebrew and Greek Septuagint, means “the land, the earth, the soil.” God subjected His whole creation to the Law of decay and death, but with the expectation that someday it will be liberated with Man.

    The creation has no mind or soul, so it cannot literally “await with longing” the final Day of Redemption. It is personified as “eagerly waiting” because its liberation is directly linked with Man’s liberation, to wit, the redemption of our body (v23). The whole creation, Man and his World, groans under the effects of sin, but there is an earnest expectation of future liberty and glory. The Psalms and Prophets are filled with descriptions such as the earth rejoicing, the hills singing and the trees clapping their hands when in truth it was Man who was rejoicing (Ps 114:6; Is 49:13; 55:12).

    The parallel between Man and Creation in the picture of Redemption is interesting. Man’s physical body will die and decay into dust, only to be remade a glorious body at the end of the world. In a similar manner, the Universe will also utterly pass away, its very elements burned to nothing, only to be remade by God into a new heavens and a new earth of eternal righteousness (2Pet 3:7-13). The full significance of that truth has not been made known to us. Will there be animals in Heaven? See my note in Rev 21:1.

    There is little merit to argue against the odd opinion of some commentators that by creature Paul was referring to the “Gentile world.” See Barnes, Clarke, etc. Why would the Apostle have eschewed the normal term in favor of such an obscure figure?

23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.

     This expels any doubt that Paul is here speaking of a future redemption of the body and the whole creation. In light of this passage and many others, the popularity of Preterism among certain Christian scholars is an unfathomable mystery. The Apostle longs for a full, future adoption and inheritance, in fact, the whole Creation is groaning with us in anticipation of that great Day (2Cor 5:2). And we are to believe that this happened at the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.? See my notes against Preterism at Mat 13:41; 24:34; Rev 20:1.

     The Christian has within him the firstfruits of the Spirit, which is another way of saying that God has given unto us the earnest of the Spirit (2Cor 5:5), or the earnest of our inheritance (Eph 1:13-14). The ceremony of Firstfruits in the Jewish religion is typologically linked with resurrection. Elsewhere, Christ is called the firstfruits of them that slept (1Cor 15:23), and the believers are called a kind of firstfruits of His creatures (James 1:18; Rev 14:4). The offering of Firstfruits was that portion pre-dedicated to God in anticipation of the full harvest to come later. It was sealed, or completed, fifty days later by another offering of Firstfruits at the finish of the harvest. See my note at 1Cor 15:20.

24 For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? 25 But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.

     One does not hope for something he is already experiencing, but for something he has not yet seen (Mat 5:8). The Christian lives in great expectation and hope of eternal salvation complete with the redemption of his body. In the face of much accusation, Job’s confident expression of this hope is astonishing: For I know that my Redeemer liveth, and that He shall stand at the latter day upon the earth: and though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God: whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me (Job 19:25-27). This Hope is exceedingly powerful, able to sustain the spirit in spite of overwhelming sorrow and difficulties; it is an anchor of the soul (Heb 6:19).

     We are saved by hope. But aren’t we saved by faith (Rom 5:1), I mean, by grace (Eph 2:8)? Theologians tend to manipulate prepositional phrases such as these in making assertions of serious moment. Here that is revealed to be a dangerous exercise. The safer method is to seek the intent of the general statement so as not to overturn it by a dexterous re-handling of conjunctions and prepositions that have more than one usage. In Rom 5:2 we can see faith, grace and hope in one verse. 

     The Apostle’s basic thought is this: Our salvation is based upon the hope that our bodies will be resurrected from the grave (1Pet 1:3). This hope we must hold firm unto the end in order to be saved (Heb 3:6; Col 1:23). Faith, Hope and Love are the Great Three that surpass and abide (1Cor 13:13). Paul knew and confessed this hope of eternal life (Tit 1:1-2).

26 Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.

     The Apostle returns to the primary subject of this chapter, the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit in the heart of every believer. The third person of the Trinity is of inestimable value to the spiritual good of every Christian. He helpeth (sunantilambanetai)our infirmities. According to Strong’s Greek Dictionary, this verb means “to take hold of opposite together, to co-operate (assist).” Like two workmen carrying a load between themselves, the Spirit assists the Christian in every weakness. He works quietly and invisibly, but the results are sure and powerful (John 3:5-8). We might not even know He is helping, and in fact, many times we are so far from understanding the situation that we do not even know how we should be praying! But the Spirit knows and He maketh intercession to God on our behalf, so that all things work together for (our) good (v28).

     The beauty of this truth is that, by praying at all times in the Spirit, we shall always be in tune with God’s will, even though we do not pray knowledgeably. Eloquence of speech, clear understanding, a life of powerful victory, these are not essential to obtain before going to God in prayer. The Spirit will tune the prayer of the humble and fervent person for his spiritual benefit. The important thing is to pray! 

27 And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God. 28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.

     Jesus Christ is He that searcheth the hearts (Jer 17:10; 1Chr 28:9; Rev 2:23) and also maketh intercession for the saints (Heb 7:25). So the Spirit and the Son work as intercessors for the saved before God. Their intercessions are beyond our comprehension; they work all things for good to them that love God. This last phrase is conspicuously ignored by Calvinist commentators on these verses! Those that love God are the ones that are keeping His commandments (John 14:23) and the one who says He loves God but doesn’t keep His sayings is a liar and the truth is not in him (1John 2:4). The word order and verb tense in the original Greek shows this emphasis: “And we know that to those who are loving God all things do work together for good.” (see YLT).

     All things do not work together for good to those who are disobeying God’s Word. “They who say sin works for good to them that love God speak blasphemous nonsense. A man who now loves God is not now sinning against God” (Adam Clarke). This is not to say that God does not take Man’s bad decisions/actions and make something good come out them. His business is to give beauty for ashes (Is 61:3). However, that work is fully grounded in His goodness and mercy. For whatsoever a man soweth that shall he also reap. A man who sows to the flesh will reap the bad fruits that lead to death. See 1Tim 6:18.

     The purpose of God is to work in the good and bad things that come into the life of the Christian such that he emerges a better and more spiritually mature individual. From the beginning, He purposed us unto the fellowship of His Son (1Cor 1:9), that is, His plan is that we be conformed to the image of His Son (v29). This is a life-long process of character-shaping and faith-building. We are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them (Eph 2:10). Even affliction can work for our good (Ps 119:71; Heb 12:11) if we persevere patiently in it (James 1:3-4; Rom 2:7; 5:3).

     The called. While kletos can refer to the general invitation to be saved, it is more commonly used to refer to the saved, those who have accepted the universal call unto salvation (Rom 1:6-7; 2Tim 1:9; Jude 1:1; Rev 17:14). See my notes at Mat 22:14; 1Cor 1:2. The Greek word for church (ekklesia) is formed from the same root word and means, “the called out” (1Pet 2:9). They that love God…are the called (v28). These elect were foreknown by God, and predestinated, called, justified and glorified.

29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

     Even before the world began and Adam sinned, God had a plan to reconcile man to Himself (2Tim 1:9; Tit 1:2). Since He exists outside of time, He knows the future as plainly as the past and present. His pre-determined (from our time-restricted perspective) program required that to be saved one must be conformed to the image of His Son (also 2Thes 2:13; John 15:6). Notably then, the Covenant to the Jews was not God’s complete program, for to become like His Son is a concept unknown in the Mosaic Covenant.

     Of course God foreknew who would be saved and who would reject His plan! If He could fore-ordain that Christ would die for the sins of the world (1Pet 1:20) such that Lamb was slain from the foundation of the world (Rev 13:8), then surely He has foreknowledge of the elect (1Pet 1:2). There is nothing odd or incongruous to the idea that God foreknew each soul who would be saved. He wrote their names in the Book of Life even before the world began (Rev 13:8; 17:8), because He already knew which ones would choose to serve Him and which ones would reject Him and take their own path. God foreknew and predestinated the Covenants together with the Jewish nation and religion. He foreknew the calling of the Gentiles, which He had afore prepared unto glory (Rom 9:22-24). In His infinite wisdom, He foreknew all the great events of the world. And that is a proof of the infallibility of His plan and will.

     The fact that God foreknew each child of God is a great comfort to those in tribulation, distress, famine, peril, or sword (v35), being a proof of His great, inseparable love for the saints. Salvation is voluntary and is open to whosoever will (Rev 3:20; 22:17; Rom 10:13). Some will refuse His offer, and others will be found unworthy. It is a sobering thought that God not only writes names in the Book of Life, but also blots out names too (Rev 22:19; 3:5). But for those who love Him, the called, all things work together for good (v28) and nothing can separate them from the love of Christ. 

     God predestinated that the called be conformed to the image of His Son, which means He decided beforehand how Man would be saved (Eph 1:5). He did not predestinate the already-holy to be saved, but the willing and receptive. The Calvinist idea of predestination is that God chooses to call and justify a man without respect to man’s will, choice or character. What a low conception of God’s power and person! Is God so controlling and self-oriented that He cannot permit a man to choose for himself? How much greater is He shown to be when we recognize that God is able to control the hearts of kings and the imaginations of the World even while allowing them freedom of choice and will. That is truly a mighty God! His sovereign power and omniscience enables Him to step into His own creation and accomplish His divine will (Is 55:11) even while He allows Man the freedom of his will. That may be difficult to comprehend, but it is glass-clear in comparison to the alternative, which postulates a pre-determined universe in which Man does not have free will.

     From the very beginning we see that God’s purpose in creating the world and ordaining salvation included giving Man the option to choose or reject Him. In marked contrast to His other creative acts, God gave Man the ability to understand Him, comprehend and analyze good and evil, and even choose to believe or reject the Truth. Calvinists say that God is not truly sovereign if man has the ability to reject Him, but that is simply not true. The Almighty, Sovereign God is eminently able to set parameters whereby human agents are given the power to choose independently without diminishing His power! Consider the implications if it be true that by sovereign command God did fore-decree every minute event of world history and every decision/deed of all individuals whether good or bad. Would that not make God the very author of sin? And why did He not decree events differently to avoid much human suffering and damnation of souls? For more on the Calvinist belief system, see my notes for Eph 1:11 and Rom 5:19.

     That He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Christ is often called the firstborn (Col 1:18; Heb 1:6; 12:23; Rev 1:5) because He was the first to rise from the dead. God purposed that many brethren would be resurrected with His Son. This collective (as opposed to the individual) application of these verses sets the stage for next chapters, which more fully explore the predestination, calling and justification of all Abraham’s children – Jews and Gentiles. Especially in the early days of the Gospel, the Jewish Christians struggled to accept that truth. With his epistle to the Romans, Paul articulates particularly to the Jews the proofs of God’s change of Covenants, and he argues that, far from an improvisation, God foreknew and predestinated many brethren, including the Gentiles, unto justification and heavenly glorification. While He certainly foreknew Israel (Rom 11:2), is He not also (God) of the Gentiles? (Rom 3:29).

31 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us? 32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?

     The intent of these verses is to impress the Christian of God’s great love for him. God knew all from the beginning and He pre-planned this great communion with His saints before creating the world. He foreknew them, He predestinated them, called and justified them; and He will finally glorify them eternally. In effecting their reconciliation, He did not even spare His own Son (John 3:16). Consider these evidences of His great love for us. Shall He not freely give us all things?

     The entire progression is evidence of His love for each child of God. From before the beginning unto eternity, God knows and keeps them. This tremendous soul-comfort is a source of strong affirmation for those that are suffering for the sake of righteousness (Mat 5:10). The tempter knows their thoughts, “Why does God allow me to suffer? He claims in His Word that He loves me. I am alone, forgotten, deserted. Why doesn’t God help me?” According to the Parable of the Sower, discouragement in times of persecution and difficulty is a primary reason for falling away (Mat 13:20-21). Yet, God has not forgotten the persecuted, the distressed, the imperiled! Cruelty and death have always been the experience of God’s people (v36)! Take heart, for over all these things you shall surely conquer and soar to eternal, unspeakable heights.

     This passage is a powerful argument against the Agnostics, that group of non-Christians who believe a God did create the universe and mankind, but quickly tired of them and has forgotten them. To them, the widespread evidences of sin, wickedness, suffering and death mean that God has left Man to his own demise. There are no Holy Scriptures, there is no eternity, and God is unknowable and uncaring. Nevertheless, the promises of God are faithful and certain. God has not forgotten His saints, and what he has planned since before the world began will continue until the final Day has come.

33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth. 34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.

     Who can charge the Elect with anything that would keep them from eternal life with Christ? Certainly the Devil will try, for he is the accuser of the brethren (Rev 12:10). Yet, God is the righteous Judge (2Tim 4:8) and Christ is our Advocate (1John 2:1). If we are truly His sheep (John 10:27-29), there is no reason for worry and fear. Those who have fled to Him for refuge have a strong consolation (Heb 6:18).

     Who can come to God and condemn the Elect? Our Advocate and Sin-bearer (1John 2:1; 1Pet 2:24) has died for our sins and was raised to life again for our justification (Rom 4:25). He is making constant intercession for us (Heb 7:25; Rom 8:27). The heart-lifting words of Jesus to the adulteress are notable in this context, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more (John 8:11).

     The elect (eklektos) and the called (Jude 1:1) are the foreknown/predestinated/called/justified/glorified people of God (see Mat 22:14).

35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? 36 As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. 37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.

     There are times when the Christian does feel separated from Christ, times when he feels that Christ is distant and unconcerned with his struggles. In tribulations, distresses and persecutions, yes, we can even feel that Christ has forsaken us, that He doesn’t truly love us. Ah, but remember, physical happinesses and ease are not a token of God’s love! His people have always been slaughtered and oppressed by the wicked (v36). Persecution and death cannot truly separate us from the love of Christ. If we could but see into the spiritual realm we would immediately see that we are the conquerors and they are the defeated! (2Kings 6:15-17). We are on Christ’s side, and He will surely win the final victory.

     Make no mistake, the Devil will come in those moments of distress to sow discouragement and doubt. He will hurl insults and accusations, he will whisper that you are not saved or loved, else Christ would help you! He wants to get you to doubt God and to wonder if He is even aware of your plight. Psalm 44, which Paul quotes here, is the cry of the righteous for help. For Thy sake are we killed all the day long…Awake, why sleepest Thou, O Lord?…Wherefore hidest Thou Thy face, and forgettest our affliction and oppression? For our soul is bowed to the dust…Arise for our help, and redeem us for Thy mercies’ sake (Ps 44:22-26).

     The Christian will be troubled on every side, perplexed and persecuted, but he will never be forsaken or destroyed (2Cor 4:8-11). He shall completely conquer every and all foes because Christ loves him! And he that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be My son (Rev 21:7). In the Greek, the word conqueror (hupernikao) is a superlative form of the verb overcome (nikao). “We are not just surviving, we are overwhelmingly conquering all these things through Him that loved us.”

     If we are truly in Christ, and walking according to the Spirit (v1-9), then nothing and nobody will ever separate us from His love. Some commentators re-phrase the Apostle’s question to, “Who is able to stop us from loving Christ?” This reversal is an impertinent and self-serving re-writing of God’s Word that is based on their false idea that the saved cannot fall away. According to the Master, persecutions, perils and trials can and have discouraged people from following Christ (Mat 13:20-21; Luke 8:13). Real comfort is knowing that Christ unfailingly loves and cares for us, even in those dark, difficult days when we don’t feel His love. We must walk by faith and not by sight.

38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, 39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

     The love of God is the ground of man’s salvation, but why did God set His love upon [us] (Deut 7:7)? Certainly not because Man was impressively mighty, surpassingly beautiful, honorable or deserving! Man was God’s creation made after His image, but the corrupting, wicked machinations of Satan had defiled and contaminated Man’s soul to the uttermost. But God, who is rich in mercy, for His great love wherewith He loved us…hath quickened us together with Christ (Eph 2:4-9). God’s nature is to love (1John 4:16) and He so loved us that He gave His own Son to redeem us from the clutches of Satan (John 3:16; Rom 8:32). The angels announced the good tidings of Christ’s birth as God extending peace and good will towards men (Luke 2:14). So the love of God truly is in Christ Jesus. Or as the apostle John said, the love of God was manifested in that He sent His only begotten Son into the world that we might have Life through Him (1John 4:9). And if God did not spare His own Son in the redemption of Man (v32), shall He not keep them secure, fully protect and save them to the uttermost?

     And if God redeemed Man because of His great love for him, it is fitting and reasonable that Man love Him in return (John 15:10). He that truly loves God is the one that keeps His commandments (1John 5:3; 2John 1:6). It is the height of stupidity to think that Man does not need to love God, yet in effect that is what the Calvinists teach! They say that salvation is not conditioned upon works of obedience because Christ obeyed for us, and that keeping commandments is legalism. Thus, to them these verses are teaching that a man cannot lose his salvation. God has set His love upon the elect, and they are unconditionally, eternally saved. “God’s grace is irresistible,” they say, and not even a man’s own decision to leave Christ can remove him from salvation!    

     Yet the Scriptures are abundantly clear that a man can refuse salvation, can take his own path, can fall away from the faith. This chapter has presented the vital importance of living according to the Spirit and not according to the Flesh, for he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption (Gal 6:7-8). Truly nothing can separate the redeemed from the salvation that is in Christ Jesus, but by his own act and will a man may decide to take his own selfish path and leave that safe hold. To follow the Flesh is death, and Self is ever tempting us to reject the righteousness of faith and put Flesh on the throne of worship.

     In one of the most beautiful, compelling analogies in all the Bible, Jesus taught this principle of sure salvation in Christ. My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me: and I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of My hand (John 10:27-28). Yet, Christ does not hold a man against his own will. Any sheep may foolishly decide to leave that safety. Love can not be obligated or forced, or it is no longer love. Love is a free-will decision. God did not have to love us, He chose to love us. And the reciprocal must also be true. God does not force us to love Him, He wants us to choose to love Him. That is true love.

     The list of adversaries is representative rather than exhaustive. The angels must be Satan’s demons (Rev 12:7), and the principalities and powers are spiritual realms of wickedness (Eph 6:12). Jesus referred to them collectively as the gates of Hell (Mat 16:18). The distances (nor height nor depth) remind of the Psalmist’s words in Psalms 139:7-10.

commentary Romans 7

1 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? 2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. 4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.

     The previous chapter likened the salvation experience to Christ’s death and resurrection. We saw His crucifixion compared to the Christian crucifying Self and the World, and His resurrection was made to parallel the Christian’s spiritual rising again unto new life in Christ. Now, using the same principle of death and resurrection, Paul forms another analogy to show how the Christian’s allegiance has changed from following the Mosaic Law to following the new law of Christ. The idea in process is: “The one who has died unto sin is released from that bondage and is free to to be bound unto another, even unto righteousness (Rom 6); the Law’s statute concerning marriage agrees by way of analogy” (Rom 7).

     The Mosaic Law provided no condition for a woman to leave her husband and marry another. Any woman who did so was an adulteress. The Law bound the woman unto her husband for life. Only if her husband were to die was she free to marry another. Verse four establishes the correlation: “You Jews (who were under the Law) were freed from the Law by the body of Christ (who Himself lived under the Law and died in fulfillment of the Law). Now that the Law is dead, you are free to be married unto another, to the risen Christ.” The Apostle’s doctrine is quite evident, yet it is ignored by some even down to the present day. Inexplicably, they wish to be bound to selected portions of the OT Law (see note Rom 4:11) even though the New Testament Scriptures teach that the Law is dead, no longer in effect. Man has been loosed from the Law of Moses so that he may be bound to the Law of Christ.

     The analogy of Marriage to the relationship of God and Man is an interesting study, especially when considering the two Covenants. While the woman under the Law was never allowed to put away her husband, the husband could give a bill of divorcement to his wife and so be free to marry another, under the condition that he never re-take his first wife. Notice the analogy. If the woman is a symbol of God’s people under the Law, than she was bound unto Him for life, yet Israel forsook God and played the harlot. God was just in giving the adulteress a bill of divorcement and He will never take her back. He has chosen a new wife which has also chosen Him (see Isaiah 54). Furthermore, under Christ’s new Law neither the husband nor the wife is permitted to give a bill of divorcement. They are truly bound for life and that is beautifully true in the case of God and His new covenant people. See Mat 5:32, 19:7-9; 1Cor 7:10-11.

     Christ is the end of the Law of Moses and the beginning of the Law of Grace (John 1:17; Rom 10:4).

5 For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. 6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

     This frames again the general point of discussion for the material in chapters 6-8 (see Rom 6:20-22; 8:2). Any person that is not in Christ, is in the flesh (Rom 8:9). Whether Jew or Gentile, under the Law or without Law, we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of the our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind (Eph 2:3). Our bodily members worked sinful actions and earned the wages of death. The Law expanded this knowledge in Man, for its many rules gave opportunity to many sins.

     But now we are delivered from the Law (v6), being in Christ and living by the Spirit and according to the Law of Grace (Rom 8:4). We have been released from the old Law by death with Christ (Gal 2:19; Rom 6:6-9). While this is especially directed to the Jews, the general principle holds importance for the seeking Gentile too, for both groups have brought forth fruit unto death by disobedience to their respective laws – the law of Moses and the law of Conscience.

     The Old Covenant was largely designed to be a physical constitution, for while it touched the inner man and spiritualties like mercy and trust, its first intention was to rule the outside, the flesh, and it did so by imposing many complex and burdensome rites and ceremonies. In contrast, the New Covenant was largely designed to be a spiritual constitution, for while it does have some rules to govern the outer man, its first thought is to touch the soul, and it does so by many beautiful spiritual proofs and promises. The way of the Law was to oblige righteousness of the outer man and so affect the inner man. The way of the Christ is to make anew the inner man and so reform the outer man unto righteousness. This great Covenant shift is to serve in newness of the spirit and not in the oldness of the letter (v6). See the same two representations in 2Cor 3:6.

7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. 8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.

     The words lust, covet and concupiscence in these verses are translated from the same word (epithumia). “I learned about coveting from the Law, ‘Thou shalt not covet.’ Sin then took this as opportunity to tempt me with all kinds of coveting.” The Law educated Mankind of the manifold intricacies of Sin; for by the Law is the knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20; Gal 3:24). Its many commandments were binding and those who transgressed them were judged guilty. The Law taught personal responsibility and justice by the lex talionis – eye for eye and tooth for tooth. It showed the gravity and consequence of sin by corporal punishment – to knowingly break the Law incurred the penalty of death. And finally, the Law showed that Man would always fall short of perfect obedience, for the work of every man’s members brought forth fruit unto death (v5).

     Is the Law then sinful? Nay. It is holy, and just, and good (v12). Rather, it is Sin that works death within; the Law could have given salvation, but on account of the weakness of man’s flesh it resulted in death (v10). Sin, or the Flesh as it is later called, has deceived and slain every human who has ever lived (v11), even those who had never heard the commandment. They are not guilty of breaking the Law of Moses, but of breaking the Law of conscience (see note Rom 2:14). Those who are guilty of transgressing the Law, however, will face the greater consequence, for they were entrusted with greater knowledge and responsibility. Their transgressions of plainly written rules have shown sin to be exceeding sinful (v13).

     For without the Law sin is dead, meaning there can be no transgression of it (see note Rom 4:15). This must be understood in the context of Paul speaking to the Jews concerning their Mosaic Law, for sin in the general sense does exist outside of the Law and it is not dead. All humans, regardless of time or place, have a general sense of right and wrong built into their minds, a moral compass. The era of the Mosaic Law endured for about 1500 years, but it was instituted long after the world began (about 2,500 years according to Bible chronologists). Many godly men lived in the pre-Law era, and they were counted righteous without the Law. Job, Enoch, Melchizedek, Abraham, Noah and many more were mighty men of faith, but to our knowledge, they never held a written moral code in their hands! Clearly a different Covenant was in place at that time, concerning which we can only speculate by inferring from the Scriptures. There is no doubt that ancient Man was by nature more intelligent and innovative than present-day Man, and the scientific 2nd law of thermodynamics agrees. Evolution’s ridiculous, anti-scientific idea that Man is increasing intellectually is demonstrably false. The pyramids of Egypt are just one minor example.

     My thought therefore, is that the decline of natural human ability (observe the decline in lifespans) made a written Law more necessary. Before that time, I think Mankind were able (by conscience, superior analytical capacities and nearly faultless memory) to know God’s will on their own. And it seems that God spoke to them audibly and even visibly. Yet the history of ancient Man demonstrates this sad principle: the person with the greatest capacity for Good also possesses the greatest capacity for Evil. Exhibit A is Satan himself. And so we read of the Cainites, the Sodomites and the general population at the time of Noah. In one sense, God’s punishing Adam with natural death for sin was good for Adam. Otherwise, he would have continued forever estranged from God, with no opportunity for new birth. The same is true for Mankind in general. By limiting the lifespans of Man, God was shortening the time of their proving, making it easier for them to pass the test.

     I think the same concept is in play when we consider the reasons that God instituted the Law of Moses. He wanted to make plainer, easier, more generally attainable to a greater quantity of people. Abraham attained righteousness without the Law, but there were not many Abrahams (as his own grand-children demonstrate!). After 1500 years however, the Law had been twisted and distorted to serious human detriment. The time was ripe for Christ and the New Covenant. This sad retrogression will be repeated at the end of the present Covenant of Grace! The religious elite will distort its message, deny its real purpose and use it for personal gain. At the end of the Age, the World will see the dead bodies of those two great and famous witnesses, the Word and the Spirit, lying on the streets of the great cities of the world (Rev 11).

9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. 10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death. 11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me. 12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

      Many commentators have marveled at Paul’s dexterity in presenting Christ to the self-righteous and vain Jew (Tit 1:10), for he must inevitably show that the Law is not the final authority; it is incomplete, weak and unable to save. Arriving at the most sensitive part of his argument then, he carefully shifts the perspective from “you,” to “we,” to “I,” so that by inclusion he might soften any accusatory tone. Notice the progression:

Ye also are become dead to the Law by the body of Christ that ye should be married to another (v4). For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins which were by the Law did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. But now we are delivered from the Law (v5-6). Is the Law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not know sin, but by the Law.I was alive without the Law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died (v7-9).

     He continues in first person to the end of the chapter.

Some think that Paul, even using the pronoun “I,” speaks only as a Jew and for the Jews. Certainly the Jews were his primary intended audience, but as this chapter unfolds the scenario expands to all mankind and even to those under the Law of Grace. These particular verses however, concern the Mosaic commandments, which were given so that Mankind might obtain Life but resulted in spiritual death. For while the Law was able to give Life to those who kept the Commandments, it could not regenerate (revive) the one who transgressed it. Christ came for that very purpose (1Cor 15:45) and so fulfilled the Law.

     Sin deceived me, and by it slew me, which perhaps alludes to Eve’s testimony in Genesis 3:13 (see LXX and 2Cor 11:3). The broader principle of commandment leading to temptation and then to sin is also true in virtually all human experience. The unchurched person is not so tempted to sin, for he hasn’t full knowledge of sin. A friend once related how he told his young son not to step in the mud-puddles with his new shoes. “Where are they?” the son wanted to know. Mother sighed, “It would have been better if you would not have told him about mud-puddles!” But the cat was out of the bag and the temptations began in earnest. Ever since Adam and Eve it has so been, for it is part of God’s way to develop an honest, sincere relationship with the only being who can comprehend Him and choose/refuse to know Him.

     The Law is good (1Tim 1:8). The problem isn’t the Law, the problem is Sin. See previous note.

13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

     How can the good commandments of God be a killer? Maybe Paul posed the question to refute the objections of certain Jewish Christians who wished to continue under the old Law (see Gal 5:1). The answer is rather technical, for the commandment did result in the spiritual death of all (v10). However, the real cause of death was not the Law, but Sin…working death in me by that which is good. One cannot blame the Law (or God either) for Man’s failures. Earlier the Apostle addressed a similar objection, “Does the fact that many Israelites failed in Faith mean that God’s plan was in vain?” (Rom 3:3). No! God is good, holy and just, so His Law was good, holy and just. The real killer is Sin, showing itself to be exceedingly sinful by how harshly it opposes the commandment.

     The Law is holy and spiritual (v14), but it provided neither the means nor the power for a man to overcome his carnal nature. It’s goodness showed clearly the bounds of sin, it’s holiness called every sinner guilty, and its justice demanded the righteous penalty for each transgression. It could not, however, actually remedy the situation (Col 2:20-23). It was insufficient in that it could not cleanse the sinner from his sin (Rom 3:20; Gal 2:21; Heb 8:7). So then, New Covenant believers have become dead to the Law and married to another (Rom 7:4), under the law to Christ (1Cor 9:21).

14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

     I am carnal (sarkikos), or fleshly (1Pet 2:11). The noun form, sarx, appears in verse 18. The fleshly nature of man consists of selfish desires with constant impulses to self-gratifying actions. The Flesh and the Spirit, these are in constant conflict (Gal 5:17; Rom 8:4-5). The Flesh incites me to do what I would not, for what I hate, that I do. The spirit indeed is willing, Jesus said, but the flesh is weak (Mat 26:41). It has ever been this way, and will always be, for that is the great test of this life. Because of this terrible, latent conflict within every man, God does not demand perfect domination of the flesh nor flawless obedience to the Law of Christ, but rather a heart that is determined to constantly crucify one’s fleshly desires, ever putting to death daily the old man and denying Self with its unhealthy desires in order to please our new Master and Groom, (Rom 7:6). This conflict between Flesh and Spirit is true across all human-kind through all ages, Jew or Gentile, under Law or without Law, it doesn’t matter. Even the Christian must fight daily this inner spiritual battle with Self and Satan.

     Given the above, I believe that here Paul begins to speak as any one of us and not just those “under the Law.” Consequently, he speaks in the present tense, while the earlier personification under the Law ended in the past tense (v9-10). Notice too the change of meaning for nomos (law), which refers to the Mosaic Law in the first half of the chapter, but in the latter half does not (see v21). The battle is waged in the mind, as the Flesh attempts to bring the whole person into bondage under sin (Rom 7:23). This general truth however, does not mean that sin literally dwells in the Christian (v17), or that he is carnal (v14), or that he is constantly doing the evil that he would not (v19). The Apostle is clear: They that are in the flesh cannot please God. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit (Rom 8:8-9). Christ has delivered the believer from the body of this death (v24). Nevertheless, this passage agrees with the rest of Scripture, that two laws are constantly at work within every believer and unbeliever, the law of God and the law of sin (v25). Indeed, this struggle is far more acute in the believer, for Satan will work more intently to corrupt anybody belonging to Christ. The very fact that the believer better knows the Law makes it harder for him to keep it (see note v11).       

     Perhaps the Calvinist will use this verse as support for his idea that Man is entirely and totally depraved. I am carnal. It does sound emphatic and comprehensive. Later however, the Apostle clarifies his meaning, For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing (v18). The fallen, depraved part of Man is this fleshly, carnal nature we have inherited on account of sin coming into the world by the fall of Adam. However, every man is also born with an untarnished soul, a moral conscience, and the honest abilities to think, comprehend and choose. These two, the fleshly, selfish nature and the Godward nature continue in strong display in these verses. See our notes in chapter five.

     Sold under sin. Slavery is the imagery here, as in Rom 6:16-20. By his choices and actions, every man has sold himself unto Satan. The prophet wrote, For your iniquities have ye sold yourselves…ye have sold yourselves for nought; and ye shall be redeemed without money (Isaiah 50:1; 52:3). Anciently, a debtor who could not repay was often sold (Mat 18:23-27), but the Law allowed the slave to be redeemed by another (Lev 25:47-48). That is exactly what Christ did for us. With Paul, each person must say, I am carnal, sold under sin. Our nature is to sin. Jesus bought those slaves with His own blood!

15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. 16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. 17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

     This does not describe the condition of a wanton rebel or uncaring reprobate, but of a sincere seeker of God who is distraught by his failure to do what is good. However, let us not draw a false conclusion before the Apostle has finished his discourse. Thank God through Jesus Christ, the Christian CAN live in victory over sin (v25). He is not doomed to failure and wretchedness. Nevertheless, even the honest, submitted-unto-God believer will struggle at times to do what is good and right. Temptations unto sin and struggles with the Flesh are not in themselves signs of being Lost, but of sonship! (Heb 12:3-7; James 1:2-4). God does not take away our temptations, nor does He keep evil from affecting us (how many martyrs have proved that). He does not fight our battles for us, nor does He remove us from the World. However, He has given those beautiful, faithful promises, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee (Heb 13:5); and lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world (Mat 28:20). Casting all your care upon Him; for He careth for you (1Pet 5:7). God will make a way of escape from every temptation (1Cor 10:13); He is able to make us stand firm (Rom 14:4). The words of the songwriter come to mind: “Lord, don’t move the mountain, but give me the strength to climb.” So, fear not, little flock; for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the Kingdom (Luke 12:32).

     For that which I do I allow (ginosko) not (v15). This very common Greek word means “to know;” not just head-knowledge, but experiential and relational knowledge. It is nowhere else translated “allow” in the Greek Scriptures. However, the general sense of the verse does not substantially change regardless of which word is used. Paul says, “My members act contrary to my will; they do the evil things that I do not know, that I do not allow. If I admit that what I am doing is not right and that I should not be doing it, then I agree that the Law is true and good. And since I am doing wrong against my will, then it is not really I, but Sin within me that is doing it.”

     This is the logical conclusion of verse 13, that Sin (not the Law) worked death within each man. Do not, however, over-extrapolate this statement and ignore the body of Scriptural teaching on the subject. Man is always in control of his actions. He is not OBLIGATED to sin, nor does he HAVE to sin, but being deceived by Satan and the Flesh he chooses to sin (Rom 7:11). God created Man with a mind capable of comprehending himself, his environment and his Maker. Remember chapter three, where Paul refuted those who said God could not condemn Man for they were only acting as God had created them – bent to sin, selfish and wicked. The Calvinist believes that Man is born a wicked beast; no light of knowledge, no ability to discern good and evil, no option to choose to do good. They say that God chooses to give faith and grace to certain of these miscreants, without having shown any particular goodness or tendency towards Him. The rest of Mankind, the unchosen to salvation, are not given faith to be saved.

     The Anabaptist position is that Man is born an uncontaminated soul; he has the light of conscience and the ability to reason and understand, and he has the capability to will to do good. The actions of Adam however, have opened a new part in Man which is egocentric and vain. He knows all about the mud-puddles (see note v11). This is the Flesh, the natural man that is bent to follow Self and reject the pattern designed by God. Here the Apostle distinguishes, for our benefit, between the Will of man and the Actions of man. The upright man wills to do good, but finds that his Flesh compels him to do evil. It is Sin, the flesh, the body of death, that has sold his soul unto Satan (see also 2Tim 2:26).

18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. 19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. 20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

     The flesh is that corrupted, selfish part in each human which tries to rule the whole body. When Adam and Eve sinned, the eyes of their mind were opened to a new world of good and evil, of moral choice and personal responsibility. That very day a part of their spiritual being died and from that moment the whole world was different. The Flesh is a direct result of those first sins (see notes on Rom 5:12-13). The imagination of a man’s heart is evil from his youth (Gen 8:21). Jesus Christ, being fully human, also struggled with the Flesh (Heb 4:15). However, God designed Man with powers of conscience, reason and will, and these were not intrinsically corrupted by the Fall. Inevitably the Will of the believer clashes with the Flesh during life. These verses set the stage for the next chapter, which speaks of the war between the flesh and the spirit even within the Christian.

     I have said that I believe Paul speaks for all Mankind here, even the believer who wants to do good and delights in the Law of God, yet still ends up doing wicked acts. Others however, have pointed out that even the pagan writers of old knew of this inner battle between knowing what is good and yet doing what is bad. Euripedes wrote, “We understand and know the good things, but we do not work them out…I know what sort of bad things I am going to do: but passion is stronger than my purposes. And this is to mortals a cause of very great evils.” And Ovid, “I desire one thing: the mind persuades another. I see and approve better things: I follow worse things.” These remarkable statements do not negate the fact that even those who have chosen to follow Christ continue to war against the Flesh, and only add support to the point the Apostle has often made in this epistle: God has given all Mankind a conscience of right and wrong, yet all have failed to follow its voice. All are guilty before God; we have all taken are our own way, there is none that doeth good, no not one (Rom 3:12).

     Sin doth so easily beset us, the Apostle said to the Hebrew believers (Heb 12:1) and that’s because the inner conflict stirs up even stronger within the heart that has decided to follow Christ! However, let us troubled souls take heart, for all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution (2Tim 3:12). If there are no battles then there is no war, and without war there can be no chance of victory. Yes, we have peace with God, but the Christian can never make peace with the Flesh! That dual nature within, the will of the Flesh and the will to do the Law of God, are at enmity until the last breath of life (Rom 8:7).

21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. 22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: 23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

    The context here indicates that nomos (law) does not refer to the Mosaic Law, but to a general law or principle applicable to all Mankind. We noted (see v14) that the Apostle speaks to all men and not just the Jews in the latter half of this chapter. Paul says, “This principle works within me: ‘I wish to do good, but am ever tempted to do evil.’ For while I inwardly delight in the Law of God, the members of my body want to follow the law of sin, which tries to make me its captive by warring against God’s law in my mind.”

     The Jews should have quickly identified with this fact and even the Christian knows it to be true, for while he delight(s) in the Law of God after the inward man, the Flesh is alive and warring in his mind, trying to deceive him and make him a captive of Sin by the actions of his bodily members. The imagery is of a city under siege, in danger of falling captive to the enemy. See this motif in various New Testament passages (ie Eph 6:11-18; Rev 20:7-10). We are constantly at war in the body, struggling with Satan, Sin, and the World. The war begins in the mind and extends to our bodily members.

     The two laws at play here, the Law of God and the law of sin, are central to the topic and continue into the next chapter. Neither term refers exclusively to the Law of Moses, for consistently in this passage the Law of God means the New Covenant (see also Rom 7:25; 8:7), and the law of sin refers to the desires of the Flesh (which is part of the body). The Mosaic Law made this general law of sin more powerful (v13), but to say that this law of sin refers solely to the holy and just Mosaic Law would contradict the teaching of this chapter. Although the Law was incomplete, we know by the writings of the Old Testament that peace of mind and joy in the Lord were attainable under the Old Law. The two laws are named again in verse 25.

24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? 25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

     To this point in the Apostle’s description of Man’s dismal condition, the name of Christ has been conspicuously absent. Knowing what is good and determining to do it, yet doing the bad; affirming the goodness of the Law but transgressing it anyway – both Gentile and Jew have shown themselves unfaithful. O wretch that I am, what can I do? Who can deliver me from the body of this death? Only Jesus Christ can, and that is the wonderful news for the troubled soul which Paul has personified in this passage. Paul could not deliver himself from this condemnation, nor could the Law deliver him (Rom 8:3), but Jesus Christ is able!

     The power of Christ at work in the believer results in a double blessing. First it brings soul-healing forgiveness and second it brings powerful new weapons to overcome Flesh and Sin. The mature Christian will not live in constant failure (Rom 6:1). He will not constantly do the evil that he would not (Rom 7:19) for Christ has come to deliver and empower. The next chapter will show this even more certainly. Yes there is a most severe battle ahead, but victory is attainable through Jesus Christ our Lord.

     This is beautifully portrayed by John’s vision of a great heavenly multitude arrayed in white robes praising the Lamb and casting their crowns at His feet. “Who are these?” John wondered. The angel answered, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb (Rev 7:14). All Christians must pass through this life-test of tribulation, trial, struggle and persecution! The Devil knows he has only a short time and he furious with us for having chosen Christ (Rev 12:12). Do not be lulled into complacency.

     The body of this death. The meaning of this imagery is that our nature of Flesh is contrary to our desire to serve God. The term depicts the scene of verse 23, where the members of the body are warring against the inner Man and attempting to make him captive to the law of sin. Crucify this body of sin (Rom 6:6), consider it dead (Rom 8:10; 6:11), mortify its deeds (Rom 8:13), walk not after its desires (Rom 8:4). In the Scriptures, the Flesh is everywhere shown to be truly a body of death (Rom 7:18; 6:23; 8:8). How truly it is said, In my flesh dwelleth no good thing (Rom 7:25). How clearly it is seen that this is the part of Man that is fallen, this part which Adam did not know before he sinned. Eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil made it a part of Mankind.

     The Law of God and the law of sin. With the Spirit of God in our minds, the will of the earnest Christian is to serve the Law of God, but the Flesh is ever present, attempting to get us to serve instead the law of sin. That fact is true of the Jew who is trusting in the Law instead of Christ and also of the Gentile who is trying to follow the Law of his conscience. Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh (Gal 5:16), which is the subject of the next chapter.

commentary Romans 6

1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?

     Since sin is offset by grace, and grace is now freely available to all, why not continue in sin? This chapter expounds the situation of a person who has accepted the gift of God yet continues to yield his members unto iniquity. The resolution is definite: “Being made free from sin and become servants to God, you must show fruit unto holiness to receive the promise of everlasting life” (Rom 6:22). Sin may not reign in our bodies (Rom 6:12), for the wages of sin is death (Rom 6:23). God’s grace is wonderful, all-powerful, fully effective, longsuffering and merciful, but those who presume that grace will always cover the sin they continue to commit daily, have done despite unto the Spirit of grace (Heb 10:29) and have aligned themselves with the children of Israel, who tempted God by forcing Him to act graciously even while they were complaining and rebelling against Him. In the end, these were excluded from entering the promised land and their bodies were scattered in the wilderness (Heb 3:8-13). Sin is incompatible with the Christian baptized into Jesus Christ.

     This picture does not agree with the prominent teaching of many Protestant preachers that God’s Grace is “unmerited and irresistible.” There is, perhaps, no doctrine that clashes so spectacularly with the unfailingly, universal witness of the Scriptures. Always and without exception, Man has the ability to refuse God’s grace. Always and without exception, God’s grace comes upon men that have shown themselves worthy to receive it. True, no man judicially merits God’s grace, but only those who demonstrate a reverence and desire for God will receive it. In the final analysis, that is what God is looking for, a humble, contrite heart that trembles at His Word (Is 66:2). His eyes are constantly searching the earth, seeking to show Himself strong on behalf of those with a heart bent toward Him (2Chr 16:9).

2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

     Being dead to sin figuratively describes the proper attitude of a person who has been made righteous by the blood of Christ. Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body (Rom 6:12), mortify (put to death) all bodily lusts (Col 3:5). Dead to sin. Imagine the Devil trying to tempt a dead man to sin! Crucify the flesh with its affections and lusts (Gal 5:24), suffer with Christ in order to live unto God in the flesh (1Pet 4:1-2), put off the old man with his deeds (Col 3:9). If Christ be in you, consider your body to be dead so that sin does not overpower you (Rom 8:10; Col 3:3). The next verses expand on the figure of the Christian reckoning himself to be dead to the world and sin, but alive unto God (Rom 6:11). There is no stronger, more vivid language in the Scriptures than this picture of death and life, of crucifying the old man, of putting to death those bodily members that offend, of being dead with Christ. It depicts a bitter, continuing spiritual battle that the fearful and cowardly will not overcome (Rev 22:7-8).

     It is important to recognize that being dead to sin and being dead by sin express two very different conditions. The first describes the Christian’s attitude toward sin and the second describes the condition of a person overcome by sin. Every man dies spiritually when he sins; he is dead (Rom 7:9). Those who accept the gift of Christ are born again (John 3:7), they are alive from the dead (Rom 6:13). These two phrases, the one a figurative expression and the other a spiritual term, are seen together in Romans 8:13. The same figurative expression is used in the next chapter, but with a different object, Ye also are become dead to the Law (Rom 7:4).

3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? 4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. 5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:

     Many Scriptures describe baptism as a cleansing from sin, but here Paul views it as an identification with Christ, a sober pledge of allegiance even, in which the new believer formally and publicly submits himself to the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Being baptized into Jesus Christ means to share in His suffering and death, which brings up the key point. We must be planted together with Him in the likeness of His death in order to be raised up in the likeness of His resurrection!

     Baptism is an all or nothing choice. One cannot be baptized into certain parts of the Christian faith but reserve some areas for self or other religions. Baptism unto Christ is baptism unto death (1Cor 15:29). Not physical or spiritual death in this case, but death to sin, self and the world (see my note at Mat 16:24). Sin cannot reign in the life of a person who has been baptized unto death with Christ. Baptism is an outward sign that a person has left his old life behind and entered into new life with Christ and that agrees with a wide range of figures: the old man and the new man (Col 3:10; Eph 4:24), being born again (John 3:3; 1John 5:1; 1Pet 1:23), made a new creature (2Cor 5:17), passed from death unto life (John 5:24), translated from the power of darkness unto the Kingdom of light (Col 1:13), etc.

      Baptism as an identification with, and participation in, the sufferings of Christ can also be seen in passages such as Mat 20:22-23; Php 3:10; 1Pet 4:1-2. Baptism is both a funeral and a birthday; a soul has passed from death unto life (1John 3:14). The funeral is in stark view: baptized into His death…buried with Him…planted together in the likeness of His death…crucified with Him. The newly baptized Christian must continue in this present evil world, he goes on his life, still surrounded by the same physical things he experienced before. Inwardly however, he is a new creature and all things take on new meaning and purpose (2Cor 5:17).

     Planted together. The Greek word is found only here in the NT, but see the Septuagint in Amos 9:13; Zech 11:2. Some versions translate, “united with Him,” in deriving the metaphorical meaning that is apparently intended here. For if we associate ourselves with Christ in death to self and the old man, we shall most certainly be found worthy to be associated with Him in rising again (Rom 8:11). Planting seeds is a beautiful analogy of the resurrection of the body and is found on two other key occasions. Jesus said, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone (John 12:24). The amazing birth of plants, flowering bushes and majestic trees from the death of one tiny seed wonderfully parallels the resurrection of the body. Later in 1Cor 15:35-38, the Apostle makes that very comparison.

     The likeness of His death. Which, perhaps, draws upon Psalms 17:15 (see also Rom 8:17). Most Christians will never come close to experiencing the same sufferings as Christ, but the more important correlation is to be like Christ in the manner He approached death, completely obedient and submissive to the Father’s will. If we have been planted together in the likeness of His death. It is a strong, serious picture, but the result is even stronger and very encouraging! We shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection. At that moment, full redemption will be complete and we shall be like Him (1John 3:2), forever freed from sin.

     To enter into the arguments concerning the “correct” mode of baptism would serve to detract from the beautiful message here. Suffice to say that the Immersionist will suggest that the word “buried” implies the person is dunked under the water (also Col 2:12). The Sprinklist however, will use verses such as 1Cor 10:2 to defend their viewpoint. See my note on Mat 3:6.

6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. 7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.

     The Christian must consider himself to be dead to sin (v2,11), but how? By crucifying the old man. They that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts (Gal 5:24). This is that body of sin, the old man, the flesh – all synonymous terms for the sin-contaminated part of man which constantly wars against the spirit. The old man must die so that the new man can be born. The old man served sin, the new man lives unto holiness (Rom 6:22). These verses portray the death of the old man as a definite, past event, in parallel with the image of baptism. By other Scriptures however, and especially the next chapter of Romans, we see that the old man is continuously tempting the Christian to sin and so it must be put to death death daily (see Rom 8:13; Col 3:5; Gal 5:17; 1Cor 15:31). Perhaps however, the Apostle alludes to the difficulty of putting off the old man (Eph 4:22) by calling it a crucifixion, a long torturous death.

    The person who has crucified the old man is dead to sin and freed (dikaioo) from sin (v7).  While the meanings are not that different, this Greek word is virtually always translated justified (and a dozen times in Romans alone). The death of the old man and the birth of the new man signifies reconciliation with God, justification, forgiveness of sins, salvation. He is free from sin and death (Rom 6:18; 8:2). Peter wrote similarly, He that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin (1Pet 4:1). In other words, he that is truly crucifying his flesh has ceased sinning. Elsewhere Paul affirmed, I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live (Gal 2:20; 5:24).

8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him: 9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.

     Dead with Christ. This speaks in a figurative sense, for that is the context here (see note Rom 6:2). Dead to sin, his flesh crucified with Christ, the justified Christian rejoices in the two-faceted promise that he shall also live with Him. To live with Christ is first the privilege of reigning with Him in life (Rom 5:17), but even better is the promise that God will one day quicken his mortal body to eternally live with Christ in the heavens (Rom 8:11). Paul repeated this promise to Timothy during the last weeks of his life (2Tim 2:11).

     Death has no dominion over the free-from-sin and made righteous saint of God! That is particularly encouraging for the one who sees the end of his life fast approaching, whether by martyrdom or natural causes. The Apostles saw Christ alive from the dead, walking, talking, eating. They, with us, have real reason to believe that God will raise up also all those who are dead with Him. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power (Rev 20:6). The first resurrection is the death of the old man and birth of the new man (2Cor 5:17), and the second death refers to eternal punishment (Rev 20:14).

10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God. 11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.

     Christ died once (Heb 9:28), but now lives forevermore unto God (Rev 1:18). Sin and death have no power over Him any longer. Soo too the Christian should “arm himself with the same mind” (1Pet 4:1). We have died unto sin and now are alive unto God. Sin must not have dominion over us (v14). This life is a quickly-passing trial and for those who are faithful, life everlasting awaits. This attitude is the beginning for a life of victory over sin. We, being dead to sins should live unto righteousness (1Pet 2:24).

     A dead man cannot sin. So consider your Flesh to be dead (Rom 7:18).

12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof. 13 Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.

     The words are strong, Let not sin reign in your mortal body. When sin reigns in you, he controls you. You are enslaved to him, you obey him, you yield your members to unrighteousness. When Christ reigns in you, He controls you. You are enslaved to Him, you obey Him and yield yourself to doing His will.

     The body is mortal, meaning it is destined to die. But the real You is more than a mortal body, for you have control over your own body; you yield your members either to doing unrighteousness unto sin, or to doing righteous deeds unto God. The word melos is used often in the Scriptures to refer to parts of the human body (Mat 5:29-30; 1Cor 12:12-27; James 3:5-6), like hands, feet, eyes, tongue, etc. In Romans 7:23, a distinction is made between the mind and the other members of a body.

     The members of one’s body can be used for good deeds or for bad. They become instruments (holpon) on one side or the other. The Greek word is often used in contexts of soldiery (see John 18:3; Rom 13:12; 2Cor 10:4). To yield one’s body to either God’s use or to Satan’s use is a figure repeated through verse 19, and also in Romans 12:1 where the same Greek word is used. The body is controlled by the mind, will and emotions, and to these the Apostle appeals: “the Flesh, that old body of sin, wants you to yield your members to work iniquity, but don’t give in to him.” 

     Alive from the dead. This is the key point of this chapter which links to that great spiritual event of every born-again believer upon passing from death unto life (John 5:24-25). It is the resurrection of the spiritual part of man which was slain by sin (Rom 7:9). “Remember this, that once you were dead in sins, but now the Son has given you new life! (John 6:40). So you must not yield your bodies unto sinfulness, but to His service and will.”

14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. 15 What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid. 16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?

     In the New Testament era, seekers of God are no longer obliged to follow the Law of Moses, but to live according to the new law of Grace. These two Covenants are compared and contrasted all through the book of Romans and in this chapter Paul debunks the idea that to be free from the Law is freedom to sin. The Word of God teaches the stipulations of this Covenant of Grace and its precepts, warnings and commandments are not optional! Unfortunately, some have taken a few verses and built a theology of Grace that is opposite to all Law, effectively making obedience unnecessary. In doing so, they ignore many categorical warnings that evil-doers will be judged, that those who disobey will be cast into the Lake of Fire, that only doers of the Word will be justified. It is foolish and irrational to believe that the Bible is true concerning grace and justification in Christ, but not true when it warns against disobedience and selfish living. Either it is wholly true, or we cannot trust it at all.

     The Law and Grace are good and necessary (Rom 7:12; 1Tim 1:8), but they must be correctly balanced (Rom 11:6). Living under grace cannot mean living lawlessly (1Cor 9:21), for the Christian is subject to the law of Christ (Gal 6:2). That is plainly seen right here, for “you are a servant of the one you obey.” The false doctrine of “free grace,” and its companion error of “irresistible grace,” are incompatible with the substance and tone of the teachings of Christ and the Apostles. God’s grace is freely offered to all, but Man was designed and created with the ability to reason and choose for himself. Each person has the ability to refuse the gift of grace. God does not force Himself upon men, which is why Paul warns: “You must not allow sin to have dominion over you.” The injunction would be meaningless if grace were irresistible. Again, we are either serving Satan or we are serving Christ. We identify which one is our master by the things that we do.

     Some commentators fail to recognize the implications of this comparison of the two covenants, the Law of Moses and the Covenant of Grace. Adam Clarke, for instance says the Mosaic Law “exacts obedience, without giving power to obey; that condemns every transgression and every unholy thought without providing for the extirpation of evil or the pardon of sin” (Clarke). Would our good God impose such a Law? One that is impossible to keep and does not provide a means of pardon? May it never be! The Law of Moses was a good covenant, and did provide a means for man to seek God’s pardon such that he could commune with Him; Paul claimed to be blameless in its righteousness (Php 3:6). Paul is not denigrating the old Law, but showing forth the new Covenant of Grace, that it is authorized to fully pardon the penitent soul and is purposed for obedience unto righteousness. See his full conclusion in Rom 6:22.

17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you. 18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.

     Every one of us were once the servants (doulos) of sin, but having been made free from sin, we are now slaves (doulos)of righteousness. The words are strong, “You were set free from the bondages of sin in order to become enslaved to righteousness!” Made free (eleutheroo) from sin – the statement is thrice repeated in this chapter. The Greek is different in verse 7, but the same in verse 22. In this context of slaves and works of iniquity or righteousness, to be made free from sin is to be delivered or liberated from Satan and sin (see Rom 8:2; Gal 5:1). Jesus said, Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free (John 8:32). He was referring to Himself and to His teaching, for a few verses later He said, If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed (John 8:36). Freed from Satan and iniquity, but enslaved to Christ and righteousness, this is the way of Grace.

     Obedience, that word which many cannot bear, is on display once again. The form of doctrine that they were obeying for access into grace (Rom 5:2) was the very Word of God that Paul was teaching (see 1Thes 2:13). The word form shows again the contrast between the Law of Moses and the Law of Grace, for both are based upon the Word. The form of the new covenant however, is a spiritual experience of the heart that centers upon mercy and humility (see Mat 5:1).

19 I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh: for as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness. 20 For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness. 21 What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death. 22 But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.

     Will you be slaves to uncleanness? or to holiness? The Apostle speaks in such blunt terms because of their fleshly nature, for some of them had not progressed far in their spiritual learning (see 1Cor 3:1-2; John 3:9-12). In repeating his earlier exhortation (Rom 6:13), Paul strengthens his argument that living under Grace can never be allowed to excuse living in uncleanness and iniquity. The Covenant of Grace is much superior to the Covenant of Law and its yoke is much lighter, only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh (Gal 5:13). Man will have only one general master, he is either the servant of God or the servant of Satan (Mat 6:24).

     The estate, purpose and end result of the Christian who is living under the Covenant of Grace is beautifully described in four succinct phrases in verse 22. Made free from sin and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life. Every one of those phrases are tremendous subjects on their own. It makes a powerful and fitting conclusion to the questions which predicated this chapter.

23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

     Two greater contrasts do not exist! So which will it be? Death or Life? (Deut 30:19). The book of Romans has shown that every man has worked for Satan and earned the wages of sin. And that is death. Not the death of the physical body, but spiritual death, which, at the end of all definition, is to be separated from God and goodness and united to Satan and wickedness. Jesus Christ however, is standing alive and whole at a burst-open grave, and He offers to whosoever will the Gift of God (Rev 22:17). See my notes in Rom 5:15-18 for a deeper exploration of this gift. Wages imply personal work, while a gift is received from someone else. The wages of sin are fully deserved, and imply that the punishments of Hell are exactly that, no more and no less.

     Since spiritual death is the earned condition of a person who has sinned, the death of the body at the end of life changes nothing. The soul continues estranged from God and a slave unto Satan. Eternal life is gifted by God to all who choose faith in Jesus Christ. It too is a spiritual condition, so again the death of the body at the end of life changes nothing. The soul continues with the Lord forevermore (1Thes 4:17; Rev 22:5).

     Annihilists, who believe that the souls of the wicked cease to exist but the souls of the righteous have eternal life, are forced into a logical fallacy with regards to these two conditions or estates: the wages of sin unto death, or the gift of God unto eternal life. If the one has an end, so should the other. Death implies eternality, forever dead; but the Apostle is speaking of spiritual death, which we know by the Scriptures even occurs during life, with no other effect upon the person. He lives in the body, soul and spirit until the end of his days, when the body dies but the soul and spirit continue to exist, and go to the One who will decide their merits – eternal life, or the second death of eternal punishment in the Lake of Fire (Rev 14:11; Mark 9:44).

     The Scriptures uniformly present the future states of the wicked and righteous as unending existences in their respective places (ie Luke 16:19-31). Knowing that our God is good, just and all-wise, we are sure that He will only assign punishments that are deserved and each case will be weighed separately and judiciously (Luke 12:47). The same will be true for heavenly rewards (1Cor 3:12-15).

commentary Romans 5

1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: 2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

     The state of justification is being at peace with God – forgiven, cleansed, saved; reconciled to communion again with God. That is the work which Christ has wrought as the Mediator between God and Mankind (1Tim 2:15). We have access to this high position only by faith in the One who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification (Rom 4:25). And only the simplest aspects of faith are needed to gain this entrance into salvation: hear, believe and ask. Just the informed decision of the will to accept the gift that Christ is offering (Rom 10:10). No good works, no personal recognition, nothing of human honor or gain. It is uniquely available and achievable by every and any person who has been born. Later will come opportunity for faith to mature and bear the fruit of the Spirit and works of Love. God isn’t in the business of saving good people, but sinners (Mark 2:17).

     In the commentary for Rom 4:3, we noted the harmony of teaching between James and Paul concerning faith and works. Here we see an additional point of concordance. The initial faith that is required to be saved and the mature faith of the saved are not equals. The initial act of faith is a decision of the will to accept Christ, but the continuing work of faith is to persevere in His commandments just as Abraham did. In the heart of a true believer, faith takes root, begins to grow, blossoms and then bears good fruit (Rom 1:17).

     This grace wherein we stand is the blessed condition of being at peace with God (v1), in full knowledge of His forgiveness, compassion and phileo love. In this blessed state, His mercies are new every morning (Lam 3:22-23). It is a station of grace, separate and distinct from that state a man might gain by doing the works of the Law. Again, faith is the means of access into this grace, for it is not attainable by human works. It is a gift that God offers to every man, without respect of persons. This has been the Apostle’s point in these chapters and it is particularly important for the Judaizers to hear it.

     I remember as a youth wondering why the Holy Spirit moved the New Testament writers to explain so often and in such repeated detail that following the Old Covenant is futile for those living in the present age of the New Covenant. It seemed so obvious that the New was meant to replace the Old. Surely that human inclination would die out with the Jews’ religion? But no! I am amazed at the allure of the Old Testament Law even today, as certain groups of Gentiles and Jews still think to become holy by keeping (in varying degrees) Old Testament commandments. They choose to be yoked again to that bondage which cannot gain this state of grace in spite of these strong chapters (and Gal 3:1-3). The Holy Spirit knew the future, and these Scriptures are strong evidences against the Judaizers present efforts to elevate the Law once again. The New Covenant of Grace has superseded the Old Covenant of Law forever and that is true for the Jews too. They will never be reconciled to God by keeping the Mosaic Law, so we should not encourage them in that fruitless pursuit. Point them to the one and only hope of Israel (1Cor 1:21-24).

3 And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience; 4 And patience, experience; and experience, hope: 5 And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.

     The saints of the Kingdom rejoice during their trials and sufferings, knowing that these work to purify and increase their heavenly experience (2Cor 4:17). In this we note another striking difference between the Age of Law and the Age of Grace. God’s interaction with Man in the Old Covenant was largely a physical experience, but the New Covenant is designed to emphasize a spiritual communion. Tribulation and trial were not met with joy under the Judaic Law, yet Jesus came preaching an entirely new Kingdom in which blessings are counted to the man who is persecuted for the sake of righteousness (see note Mat 5:1).

     Nevertheless, Christians are often tempted to discouragement and wavering by physical trials and suffering. The Apostle Paul was troubled on every side, persecuted and cast down, but he refused to despair and distress (2Cor 4:8-9). This verse comforts the suffering soul of faith to focus on this beautiful truth, that the love of God has been poured out into their hearts. Probably the hardest part of suffering is the feeling of being abandoned by God, but remember that in His greatest hour of need, Christ felt alone and forsaken in His suffering too. The work of the Holy Spirit in the heart of the Saved is key to this experience.

     Patience (hupomone). The contemporary sense of meaning is Perseverance, the crowning jewel of faith. To sustain faith at all times and in every circumstance is the constant test of being a follower of Christ, for Perseverance is only developed through suffering and trials: the trying of your faith worketh patience (James 1:3). Pressing on in the face of pain and failure is the mark of that saving faith which overcometh the world (1John 5:4). Meanwhile, the lazy, weak-minded person will receive the Word joyfully at first, but being easily offended, in the time of temptation he falls away (Mat 13:21; Luke 8:13).

     Experience, or “proven character” (NASB). The word is elsewhere translated proof (2Cor 2:9; 13:3; Php 2:22), which better fits the progression of tribulations to perseverance to proof to hope. The one who lives by the Law of righteousness which is of faith will attain to this Hope which will never disappoint. Every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as He is pure (1John 3:3). This is not an uncertain, wishful hope, but an expectant, sure hope. It is called a hope because it is not yet reality. See the note on 1Cor 13:13.

6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. 7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. 8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

     There is no precedent, whether literal, analogical or typological, to Christ the Omnipotent giving His life to save helpless Mankind. The very concept of God, or any King, offering himself as a ransom for his people is altogether unique and peerless in human history. Beyond that even, Christ died for men and women when they were without strength, yet sinners…dead in trespasses and sins (Eph 2:1). The Just died for the unjust (1Pet 3:18). There are scores of types and shadows in the Old Testament that describe aspects of Christ and the Atonement, but I do not know of one that foreshadows this particular truth. It was one of those mysteries that God, in His wisdom, had hidden from Man from the foundation of the World (1Cor 2:7).    

     Jesus said, Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends (John 15:13). And that He did. God commendeth His love toward us…this kind of love is beyond human comprehension or achievement. Since God knows the future, He knows what the exhibition of His love will gain. A human cannot know if his love will result in anything of worth or merit.

9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. 10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

     Earlier in this chapter the Apostle concluded that we are justified by faith (Rom 5:1); now he says we are justified by His blood. This displays the two parties of the New Covenant and their individual actions. Christ’s blood is the agent of justification, but He justifies those who demonstrate appropriate faith. The Scriptures also say we are justified by His grace (Rom 3:24; Titus 3:7), meaning that Man cannot earn justification by good works. Yet, as these Notes have attempted to show, that crystal revelation cannot be construed to eliminate any and all human participation in the salvation of his soul. Grace descends from above upon those of Faith below; then justification is realized (Eph 2:8).

     Every man will choose to walk upon one of two paths in this life: the narrow path of faith in Christ that leads to eternal glories, or the wide road of anti-faith that leads to everlasting destruction. Once we were enemies of Christ, children destined to experience eternal wrath, but Christ wrought an incredible work of reconciliation, offering Himself as the perfect and adequate sacrifice and thereby gain the authority to take away the sins of a man so that he can appear in the presence of the Holy God.

     God placed an amazing and beautiful parallel of these two paths of faith/anti-faith leading to their respective eternal destinies in the midst of the terrible and painful account of Christ dying on Calvary’s cross. It is recorded that two thieves were crucified with Him, one on either side. Both were wicked sinners, condemned to die a long, cruel and pitiless death. Both were helpless sinners without strength, entirely unable to save themselves. They veritably represent every man and woman who has ever lived. One chose the way of anti-faith, railing at Christ and sacrileging His holy person, but the other chose Faith. He recognized his sinfulness and that he deserved this due reward of his deeds, yet he saw the opposite character in that beaten, bloodied, innocent Man upon the middle cross. And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into Thy kingdom. No good deeds could he offer, unless we count this one action to identify himself with Christ in His weakest moment. Consider further this man’s choice. At first, we marvel that he chose to believe this Christ could do anything for him at all. Dying in ridicule and ignominy, how could this lowly, lonely Man gain a Kingdom? On the other hand, what did the thief have to lose? He too would soon be dead, and he knew for certain where he must spend eternity. Unless Someone would help him? And upon that last, great Hope he threw all his soul. Against hope, he believed in hope (Rom 4:18). He confessed that he was a sinner and that Christ was sinless, and he asked for mercy. See the account in Luke 23:39-43.

     Saved by His life – this is resurrection power. See note on Rom 4:25.

11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.

     Curiously enough, this is the only occurrence of the word atonement in the New Testament. Equally surprising, this Greek word (katallage) is found only once in the Septuagint, where it is translated “compensate” (Isaiah 9:5). In the NT, katallage occurs also in Romans 11:15 and 2Cor 5:18-19, but is translated reconciliation. Its verb form katallaso appears in verse 10, being reconciled to God (also 1Cor 7:11; 2Cor 5:18-20). By definition, this noun/verb pair means, “a change or adjustment of accounts,” and their root word (allaso) means to change, exchange, transform (see Thayer’s, Acts 6:14; Rom 1:23; 1Cor 15:51). Although katallage is not a common word, its root with other prefixes occurs frequently with the same general meaning. For examples, see parallage (James 1:17), diallagathai (Mat 5:24), antallagma (Ruth 4:7) and allagma (Lev 27:10).

     We have now received the atonement, or adjustment of accounts unto reconciliation. This is the very contextual point of these chapters, in which Abraham received an adjustment of righteousness on account of his faith which privileged him to stand in God’s presence. In the Old Testament, atonement was always made, it was not received. But since Christ has come, we have now received the atonement. The sacrifices of the Old Covenant were required to make an atonement for your souls (Ex 30:15) by the forgiveness of sins (Lev 5:10). However, the blood of bulls and goats cannot truly take away sins (Heb 10:4), so those atonements looked forward to the one atonement that can veritably remove sins. If justification is the state of being right with God (v1), then the atonement is the method or basis by which that can take place.     

     In the OT, the word atonement appears more than 80 times and translates the Hebrew words kaphar and kippur. However, the Greek words that the Septuagint uses (exilasmou, exhilaskomai) are never used in the New Testament (although see 1John 4:10 for hilasmos, which only lacks the prefix). After having studied every occurrence of these words in the Greek and Hebrew Scriptures, I believe the fundamental idea in offering a sacrifice of atonement under the Old Covenant is that it was a personal gift to God to show one’s desire to receive favor in his sight. Offered from a low position and with no intent of “satisfaction” or full repayment, it was a simple gift that hoped for a change of estate. This is the exact intent of kaphar in Gen 32:20, long before that word was used by Moses in the Judaic worship system. The atonements did not purge the sin, nor did it repay the sin; it covered the sin until such time that the sin would be repaid and purged. And that is the meaning of kaphar upon its first appearance in the Bible, where in Gen 6:14, Noah covered (kaphar) the Ark with kopher. Outside of this passage, kopher always means a sum of money used to ransom, bribe, or redeem. These singular occurrences of kaphar before the Mosaic Law add dimension to the meaning of the word and help us understand why God had Moses use it in deeply religious terms. Later, the prophets used kaphar in its fully realized spiritual sense, “to forgive, pardon, pacify,” for that is the result of an atonement sacrifice.

     The Day of Atonement (kippur) marked the most sacred ceremony in the Mosaic Law. While the kaphar was an offering by any common man (with priestly coaction) to solicit the favor/pardon of God, the kippur was a High Priestly ceremony that directly speaks of Christ offering Himself as the means whereby a man is able to solicit the favor/pardon of God and be fully reconciled to Him. We have now received the atonement. The kaphar was a true sacrifice in that it was voluntary and personal, but it could only cover the sins of one (the offerer). The kippur of Christ on the other hand, was infinitely more valuable in that it was intermediary, plenary and eternal. These three aspects directly contrast to the kaphar of a man under the Law, for note that the atonement of Christ was 1) Intermediary, being effective and available for not only the offerer, but for all Mankind. 2) Plenary; being far from just a covering of sins, it is able to remove the sins of the world. 3) Eternal; one offering of the perfect sacrifice effected full reconciliation forever.

12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

     Adam and Eve were perfectly created and placed in a perfectly created World. They were poised to live forever in harmony and beauty in the Garden of Eden with God. Their sin not only ended that dream, it drastically changed their lives and the lives of their children and children’s children even down to the present day. The entire Universe fell under the curse of decay and death, subjected by God unto vanity on account of Satan and sin (Rom 8:20-21). We see the effects of sin everywhere in the physical world and it rules all life under entropy and order-to-chaos laws.

     Sin also brought major changes to the spiritual world, although those effects are harder to understand. The day that Adam sinned, a part of him died (Gen 2:17). We might say he died spiritually, for that inward, invisible part of Man which is responsible for thought and decision was breached and poisoned. Protestant commentaries stress that physical death was the penalty for Adam’s sin and virtually ignore the fact that guilt is not assessed to the physical body but to the spirit/soul of a man. Nor did Adam physically die in the day that he ate the fruit. However, he did die spiritually in the very moment he transgressed the commandment (Rom 7:9). This “fallen” part of Man was passed on to Adam’s children, and to their children, on down to the present day. Contrary to Protestant belief, we were not all “in Adam” when he sinned and are therefore guilty of Adam’s sin. How preposterous is that notion! Yes, every man has been gravely and intrinsically affected by Adam’s sin, but only by inference and extrapolation can these verses be made to teach the Calvinist idea of “original sin.”

     Unlike Adam and Eve in their pre-sin estate, every person is now born with a sinful nature; he is inclined to sin, pre-disposed to please his own flesh. Left to itself, every ordered system in the physical realm tends to disorder. Left to himself, every man spiritually tends to disobey God and follow his own will. However, it is a serious overreach to infer that from birth all men are naturally and utterly depraved, sinful and spiritually dead, for that condition is a consequence of individual sin. Notice, Death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned. The spirit/soul of a man cannot be sinful or fallen before sin, so these cannot be part of this “sinful nature” that Adam’s sin brought into the world. We repeat, Adam did not pass the guilt of sin to other souls per pro, for the Scriptures are clear that only one’s own sin will estrange him from God. The soul that sinneth IT shall die (Eze 18:20). The Apostle also wrote, By man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead (1Cor 15:21)

     If it be true that Adam passed the guilt of sin to every man, then he is not responsibility for his condition. He is a soul of Satan’s and is destined for punishment with Satan at life’s end regardless of whether HE sins or not. Adam sinned for him and he must bear the guilt of it. That would be most egregiously unfair and unlike God. Moreover, if a man’s own actions does not bring the guilt of sin, then Jesus’ death was not an act of mercy, but an act of fair play. God must rectify this unjust situation of a man guilty of sin without action or choice. Again, that does not fit God’s character. Everybody intrinsically knows that he is guilty of death on account of his own actions, for all have sinned (Rom 3:23).

     The difference is monumental. Is a soul born estranged from God or in union with God? It is universally believed that babies belong to God and not Satan; if a child dies before reaching the age of accountability he will go to heaven. That truth implies the soul of every man is NOT born guilty of the sin of Adam and is not utterly depraved and sinful. Instead, every soul is perfectly and sinlessly created and placed in the womb. It is only later that Satan’s corrupting ways will bring temptation, sin and death (James 1:13-15). Then and only then does the soul become estranged from God (Rom 7:9-11).

     A man’s own choices and actions cause his own guilt, that is only common sense. He alone is responsible for his sin and destiny. The most basic of all scientific laws, the Law of Cause and Effect, requires this to be true! Every effect had a cause, which itself was an effect of a cause, and which can be traced back in time unto the very beginning. The original cause by which Sin has come to exist in the world is the sin of Adam, that is what this passage says. While verses like Psalms 51:5 and 1Cor 15:21-22 are used to promote the “guilty from birth” notion, they are better fitted in the interpretation we have just given, which believes a man is born with a sinful physical nature, but not a sinful soul nature. The soul becomes corrupted and sinful on account of it’s own choice and actions.

    A young man once asked me the following hypothetical question. Given that Jesus never sinned and so was never corrupted, would He not have lived forever on the earth? I don’t think so. We said that Adam and Eve would never have died if they had not sinned, but that’s because they lived in an un-fallen World. Jesus was born into a fallen World, just like every other human since Adam and Eve. This is a key aspect of the salvation story: Jesus was born as a human into his fallen world for the purpose of saving it from destruction; He redeemed it by living a perfect life and giving His life as the one and only perfect Sacrifice. Moreover, Jesus’ body was subject to like passions of pain, hunger and sickness, so His body was fully human and would have died just like other humans. However, unlike all of Adam’s descendants, Jesus never died spiritually, and that makes His bodily death strikingly opposite that of Adam and his race. Jesus bore our sins, but He was not guilty of our sins.

13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

     The section which spans verses 12-21 should be assimilated as a whole before dissection into study parts. The objective of this passage is to illustrate God’s plan form mankind by positioning in parallel several key events in the lives of the first man Adam, and Christ the last Adam (1Cor 15:45). This is advertised beforehand by the Apostle when he says that Adam is a figure of Him that was to come. He then compares the two in various ways and upon several topics, to show the commonality of all men, Jew and Gentile, to total bondage of sin and death under Satan’s rule.    

     “Sins against the Law were not imputed before the Law was given. Nevertheless, sin and death ruled over all men in that era from Adam to Moses, even though they didn’t sin in the same manner as had Adam, who is a figure of Him that was to come.” That is straightforward and logical, but what does it mean that not all men have sinned after the similitude of Adam?

     Adam was not just the first man, he was a special man. Created perfect in all ways and placed in a beautiful world of excellence where God came personally to walk and talk with him (Gen 3:8), there has only been one Adam and there never will be another. That alone makes him an interesting type of Christ. Nevertheless, the two paths of life that Adam and Christ chose are thoroughly different, for while Christ lived in full subjection to doing the will of the Father, Adam chose to take his own way. He rebelled against God and took the fruit that God had forbidden him to eat. For unlike Eve, Adam was not deceived by the Serpent’s lies; he ate that fruit even knowing he was disobeying God (1Tim 2:14). So Adam’s sin was disobeying God’s clear verbal direction, and a very glaring sin it was given that he did not have a fallen nature as all other men. On these two points, Adam’s transgression was different, for many have not directly disobeyed God’s verbal commandment and, excepting Adam and Christ, all have been born with a fallen, sinful nature. Nevertheless, death reigned over them too, even though they did not sin after the similitude of Adam. For all have transgressed the internal law of conscience that God has given them (Rom 2:14-15; 1:19-20).

     Disobedience results in guilt, sin and death (John 15:22, Rom 7:9-11), but how can one commit sin by not obeying a commandment he has not heard? (Rom 2:12). That is why before the Law, sins against it were not imputed. However, in the full picture, such persons are still sinners before God, being guilty of not diligently acquainting themselves with His laws of conscience. Even the citizens of a secular nation are required to learn the laws of the land, and they are responsible for offending any “unknown” law. Before Moses, each man was responsible to seek God and do His will according to the knowledge and conscience that is in him intrinsically. The man that seeketh shall find, but the man uninterested in the testimonies of God in nature, conscience and revelation is committing the sin of not doing what is right and good (James 4:17).

     Every person is born with certain basic concepts of God and his moral law. Perhaps some are created with greater capacities of knowledge and of them more will be required. Those who have never been introduced to the Word of God have an opportunity for salvation too, even though they have not heard of Christ in this life. The hazy references in 1Pet 3:19 and 1Pet 4:6 may explain how they do hear of Him. Nevertheless, how much more effective is the preaching of the Cross for salvation! (Rom 10:13-15).

     Some argue that this tends to repress evangelistic efforts, but that is false on two fronts. First, the righteousness of faith that Paul teaches is much easier to attain than following the law of conscience. Second, this is the same situation that God was faced with when He created the world. He knew many would rebel against His will and would be punished for their disobedience, yet He knew that the glorious awards for those who accepted His gift would far outweigh the negatives. And so He implemented His grand plan for the world and Man. For evangelists and missionaries, however, this should be a sobering thought. We must not simply awake people to the knowledge of the truth, but assist them in teaching and discipleship.

     So guilt passed upon all men in that all have sinned; some for disobeying as Adam had and others for not proving what is that acceptable and perfect will of God (Rom 12:2). Rebellion and Deception, all sins fall under one of these categories. The first is based on knowledge and the other is based on ignorance, but they both lead to death. The same two original sins, Adam’s rebellion and Eve’s deception, continue to be demonstrated today in all the world.

15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many. 16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification. 17 For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

     While it is readily apparent that these verses compare and contrast the first Adam with the last Adam, the parallels are not as sharply formed as we might wish. That might be due to the peculiarities of language and translation and maybe it is an evidence of Paul’s claim not to be of eloquent speech (1Cor 2:1). On the other hand, this Apostle was known to speak of things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures (2Pet 3:16).

     The general comparison is easily grasped, but the objects in the parallels seem to lack precision at times. The figure of comparison is Adam and Christ, and the point of contrast centers upon Adam’s offence and Christ’s gift. Both were single events with world-wide, long-standing effects. The one was an act of rebellion and selfishness, the other was an act of obedience and submission. The one caused overwhelming personal debt; the other was a gracious offer to pay the debt. The one gave reign to Satan, sin and death, the other gave reign to Christ, righteousness and life. The offence rules over all men; the gift avails only to those who accept it. 

     Here is my paraphrase translation:

(v15) “The offense and the gift are similar in that each were enacted by one man, but they are dissimilar in that while one man’s offense caused the spiritual death of all men, the grace of God acting in the other Man has caused the gift to abound unto all. (16) Neither does the result of the gift resemble the result of the offense; for after the sin the ruling was, ‘Guilty.’ The gift however, came after many sins, and the new ruling was, ‘Righteous.’ (17) If one man’s sin caused death to reign over all, so much more shall the recipients of abundant grace and the gift of righteousness reign in life by the other Man, even Jesus Christ. (18) So then, while the sin of one resulted in Man’s condemnation, the righteous judgment of One resulted in Man’s reinstatement unto life.”

     The interchange of gift (dorea), free gift (charisma) and grace (charis) is prominent in these verses. Dorea and charisma are used synonymously in the Scriptures (see 2Cor 9:15; Heb 6:4; Eph 4:7; Rom 6:23; 1Cor 12:4; 2Tim 1:6), but in this passage the translators chose to distinguish between the two by adding the apparently redundant word, free. Nevertheless, it is clearly evident that the gift which contrasts so sharply with the offence is “the Salvation of Man” (see Eph 2:8; John 4:10). This is truly the greatest, most benevolent, most unmerited gift in the history of Mankind. Who offers a throne to a peasant? Who forgives a debt of impossible worth? Who blesses a sinner with ETERNAL LIFE? It is an amazing, unspeakable gift by grace. We can only bow our heads in thankfulness, reverence and humility. Yes, there is a work that we must do, but the Big Work has been accomplished by God.

     Adam’s one sin was followed by God’s righteous decree of condemnation, which eventually extended to all men since all have sinned. After many sins however, the great mercy and kindness of God brought salvation by means of the gift of life through Jesus Christ (Rom 6:23). Adam’s sin resulted in death reigning over all mankind. Jesus Christ’s righteousness resulted in life reigning over all who receive His grace.

     Amazingly, the standard Protestant idea is that all men were “in Adam” when he sinned and so all are guilty of sin. Clarke says, “Death reigned over mankind during the period between Adam and Moses; therefore men did not die for their own transgressions, but in consequence of Adam’s one transgression.” And Guzik writes, “”He is not saying that death reigned over us all because we all sinned; he is saying that death reigned over us all because Adam sinned” (Morris)”. Wow. I can imagine Paul shaking his head at these comments and wondering, “But didn’t I just say, so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned?” (v12). The Calvinistic proposal that Man is totally depraved and sinful by being “in Adam” when he sinned is simply not taught in this passage! Nor is it to be found elsewhere in the Scriptures. And neither does it comport to common sense, nor to the character of God. Why hang all mankind’s guilt on Adam when it is obvious that all of us have personally sinned? See my notes on 1Cor 15:21-22.

18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

      Verse 18 expands on verse 16, with the comparison again centering on those two actions that have affected multitudes: the offence of Adam and the gift of Christ. This time however, the gift is only implied (the KJV has it in italics), and in its place we read, righteousness (dikaioma). This Greek word is translated justification in v16, but outside the book of Romans, and in more than 100 occasions, it is virtually always rendered, “statute, precept, judgment” (ie, Gen 26:5; Ps 19:8; Eze 18:9; Luke 1:6; Heb 9:1; Rev 15:4; Rom 1:32). The only exceptions are in Romans 2:26; 5:16; 5:18; 8:4 and Rev 19:8. The standard word for righteousness is dikaiosune, found about 100 times in the New Testament. In choosing dikaioma, the Apostle seems to convey the idea of a statute or judgment of Christ bringing spiritual life to Man. It is the righteous, just act of a Mediator (Heb 9:15) Several other Scriptures paint a similar picture and they too are found in context with the Mosaic Law. Colossians 2:14 describes an existing judgment against Man that was taken away by Christ, and Romans 8:3 describes God sending His Son into the world to condemn, or pass judgment, on sin.

     Paul’s Jewish audience would have understood these familiar Greek words according to their usage in the Septuagint, where dikaioma are honorable statutes and precepts of God, and dikaiosune are the just, pure actions of man or God. The essential truth here is this: By the sin of one came condemnation from God which eventually passed to all men; by the righteous and just life of the other came life. Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many (Heb 9:28).

     In these notes we have rejected the idea that Adam’s sin was imputed to all men in favor of the belief that every man is guilty on account of his own disobedience. Here we find an additional point in that consideration. For if this verse teaches that one man’s sin made every man guilty, then it also teaches that one man’s righteousness made every man justified. The fallacy of that idea is self-evident in the full light of Scripture, for Paul is working under the premise that the gift is not like the offence. See those points of contrast in our previous note. “Just as one man’s sin brought sin into the world and each man chose to sin for himself, so too one man’s righteousness brought salvation into the world for each man to choose that salvation for himself.”

19 For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

     The last contrast between Adam and Christ is on the topic of obedience. Though He were a Son, yet learned He obedience by the things which He suffered (Heb 5:8). Adam’s disobedience opened the world to Satan and sin, and thereby all men became sinners. The reason the Apostle here says many became sinners instead of all became sinners, is in order to maintain the parallel: Many were made sinners…many be made righteous. Notice the similar parallel in the previous verse, which showed all men becoming condemned and all men being presented with the opportunity of life.

     Shall be made righteous. Some understand this to be a simple declaration, like a “judicial” or “forensic” decree that does not actually, intrinsically, change the individual. Anabaptists believe the soul of a saved person is veritably cleansed of all sin (1John 1:7) and he is truly a new creature. The Word of God is able to discern, divide, change the innermost elements of the soul and spirit (Heb 4:12).

     Being made righteous is a two-part process, with the second, final action to be accomplished at the end of the present Age. The change from past to future in the verbs implies this second act of redemption/justification: “many shall be made righteous.” See note on Mat 19:28. The verb katastathesontai (be made) is elsewhere translated “appoint, ordain, set” (Acts 6:3; Luke 12:44; Heb 8:3; Tit 1:5), but see also 2Pet 1:8; Jam 3:6.

For main-line Protestantism, the book of Romans is a theological dissertation on Salvation, while the Anabaptist takes Romans as the basis for right living in the Kingdom of Christ. The differences in understanding this chapter are particularly evident in the disparity of their initial premises. Protestantism sees the big picture as God saving selected persons from the utterly depraved masses flowing inexorably to their infernal abode. Therefore, they believe that Adam and Eve’s sin was passed to their children in the fullest sense – every person is born in total depravity of spirit, soul, mind and volition. Man is born a wicked, guilty sinner, estranged from God and incapable to choose to believe in Him or to do good because he doesn’t possess the basic faculties to do so. Christ came to save the elect by depositing in them those necessary faculties that Adam’s race lacks. So these are enabled to believe and the rest of Mankind goes unknowingly and ignorantly unto eternal punishment.

Anabaptism meanwhile, sees the big picture as God seeking whosoever will for salvation and eternal communion with Him. They believe that while Satan spoiled God’s perfect creation through Adam’s sin, each man is born innocent in spirit, soul, mind and volition. He is not a wicked, guilty sinner at birth, but chooses to become one by his own decisions and actions. The necessary faculties for salvation have been “deposited” in every man from birth, so all possess the ability to choose faith in Christ unto salvation. Christ came to ransom Mankind from their captivity to Satan and to give him new power to reign in life in the never-ending Kingdom of Grace.

20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: 21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

     The Law was instituted by God as a way that Man could attain right-standing with Him. In truth, it was a provisional reconciliation, contingent upon a retroactive application of the sacrifice of Christ. Nevertheless, it would be imperious to infer that the Old Testament saints were unable to experience full fellowship with God. Some of the greatest giants of faith and righteousness are found in that era when the commonwealth of Israel was the Kingdom of God’s design. Elsewhere, Paul says the Law was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made (Gal 3:17-19). So the Law’s design was not to make men sinners, but to bring men to the knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20). Sin was already in the world when the Law came, but God does not impute sin without consciousness of it (Rom 5:13). Obviously, with the knowledge of sin came death (Rom 7:8), and this death prevailed and increased in the world until Christ. See our thoughts in Rom 4:3 for the reasons that God injected the Law into the world.

     It is my belief that these verses are not saying that grace abounded to Man during the time of the Law, but that God’s grace, in the form of Christ, came to Man at a time when sin abounded. The Jewish religion had largely devolved into a man-made social construct which benefited the influential and wealthy, while crushing the poor and lowly. At this time, when the world was without strength, dead in trespasses and sins, God sent His Son into the world (Rom 5:6-8; Eph 2:5).

     Under the Old Covenant, sin reigned unto death; under the New Covenant, grace reigns unto life (see also Rom 8:2). The characterization makes the two Covenants seem to be different as black is from white. Yet that assumption is not entirely correct, as we have already said. Rather, the coming of the New Covenant gives fuller credence to the Old. Yes, sin truly reigned in the past because the true Atonement was not yet offered, but sin reigns in many places and in many hearts under the present Covenant too. The saints of the Old and New are justified by the same blood of the perfect Lamb; they looked forward to that event and we look backward. They saw the pattern dimly in types and shadows and upon it they put their faith; we see the full, amazing story in detail, and upon it we also put our faith.Grace did much more abound. We began this chapter with grace (v2), and it is fitting that so it ends. The next chapter will explain this grace as it works in the heart of the believer. The privileged position of Grace is attained by faith in Jesus Christ through righteousness (dikaiosune). In this case, the Apostle apparently does not refer to the righteousness (dikaioma) of Christ in verse 18, but the gift of righteousness (dikaiosune) in verse 17, where we found it to be a euphemism for Salvation.

commentary Romans 4

1 What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? 2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.

     In this chapter, the Apostle uses the example of Abraham, the father of the Jewish nation, to support the previous chapter’s conclusion that salvation is found only by following the law of faith (Rom 3:27), also called the righteousness of faith (Rom 4:13) and obedience of faith (Rom 16:26). Keeping the commandments in the Law of Moses cannot cleanse the soul from the blots of sin, for while the Law showed man’s failure to follow God, it could not award substantive forgiveness and purity. The worshipers could offer sacrifices and rituals which covered their transgressions, but those sins were not taken away. The Lamb of God, on the other hand, was manifested to take away our sins (1John 3:5) and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. So doing the deeds of the Law can never justify the soul of man (Rom 3:28; 10:4).

     The Apostle now asks a question of weighty consequence in this Jewish dispute: was Abraham made holy by doing the works of the Law? God has blessed no man with greater promises than faithful Abraham, who became the father of many nations (Gen 17:4). However, even Abraham was not rewarded/justified by God on account of his good works (ergon, see Rom 2:6-8). That is firstly evident because the Law had not yet been given when Abraham received the blessings, and secondly because the Scripture, in a remarkable passage, says that Abraham’s faith was counted to him for righteousness (Gen 15:6). At God’s command, Abraham offered up Isaac, believing that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead (Heb 11:17-19). That is serious faith.

     Abraham…hath found. This isn’t saying that he discovered something new, but that he obtained it (same word so translated in Heb 9:12). Abraham’s faith gained for him righteousness in God’s eyes. It was not a full cleansing of the soul of all sin, for that incredible action was not yet available (see note on Romans 3:21-26). Nevertheless, God counted Abraham’s faith of sufficient value to reckon him as righteous and, consequently, conditioned for communion with God. Therefore is he called the friend of God (James 2:23; 2Chr 20:7). And in the final analysis, that is the meaning of justification; we have peace with God (Rom 5:1, see note Rom 3:28).

    But not before God. I think Paul adds this phrase as a quick aside to his main point. Let’s suppose Abraham was justified by works. Then he might have reason to boast before men, but never before God, whose works of righteousness outdo the works of man farther than the east is from the west. Any boast of man before God will utterly fail.

3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

     The KJV translators did not consistently render the Greek logizomai in this chapter. Verses 3-5 have counted, verses 4, 9 and 10 have reckoned, and verses 6, 8, 11, 22, 23 and 24 have imputed. Only twice in the other thirty occasions it is found in the NT is it translated “imputed,” and inexplicably, one of those quotes the same OT phrase in verse three (compare James 2:23). The situation is compounded by the differences of meaning in those words. To impute is to “attribute, credit or assign,” while to reckon is to “consider or regard as,” and to (ac)count is to “accrue or calculate.” The reason for the varied translations seems linked to the fairly wide usage of logizomai in the Greek Scriptures, where it is translated, “reckon, (ac)count, impute, reason, suppose, think, consider, number, esteem, devise.” Thankfully however, these differences have minimal implication for understanding Paul’s large point, that God took Abraham’s faith and counted it as righteousness. In other words, he simply points out that Abraham did not earn righteousness by his good works but found (v1) it by his faith in God.

     The same word is used in the opposite action: Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute (logizomai) sin (v8). This implies the following complement: God counts a man to be guilty, He also counts a man to be righteous. It is a unilateral action of God which is based upon His goodness and mercy and not upon the good works of man. In the light of other Scriptures however, it would be foolish to infer that Abraham’s works of obedience did not have worth and did not factor into God’s decision to bless him beyond all others. Abraham believed God. There is a serious weight of meaning in that sentence. Reading his story, we are compelled to see that his believing involved hearing and obeying God and persevering therein (Gen 22:16). Indeed, we are so impressed by Abraham’s constant and implicit obedience to God’s commandments that his other attributes fade from view.

     The work of faith is the faith that saves (1Thes 1:3), not the works of the Law. As with Abraham so with us – faith requires volition, decision and corresponding action. The work that God requires of all men is to believe on Him whom He hath sent (John 6:29) – not just confessing with the mouth, but believing unto actions that result in salvation (see note Rom 3:3). That is how and why the Apostle James uses the same example of Abraham and quotes the same OT verse to conclude, Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only (Jas 2:24). The conspicuous fact that Abraham is the Biblical model of both Faith and Works has crucial significance in understanding those terms, but a simple synthesis of the two has unfortunately eluded a large segment of Christian theologians.

     Paul and James are not in conflict here. Yet, as always, one must grasp the broader context of the respective passages before fixing the conclusion. Remember that Paul’s chief point in these chapters is to persuade the Jews to quit trusting in the Law for their righteousness and choose Christ only (just as he testified to have done in Php 3:4-9). This was a major, contentious issue in the first decades of the Church Age. Paul says, “Even Abraham your father was not justified by doing the works of the Law.” On the other hand, James’ chief point is to show that bare believing in God is not enough (Jas 2:19); one must work and act upon his confession of faith, or else his statement of belief is dead, worthless and unsaving (Jas 2:26). Paul teaches this same truth everywhere in his epistles. Perhaps the greatest example is his treatise par excellence on Christian Love, in which he shows the preeminent superiority of works of love over any other human endeavour. He concludes that Agape love is greater even than faith (1Cor 13:13). How so? Because Paul’s definition of Agape love is precisely James’ idea of Works. And that was Abraham’s way of life.

     Again, the works that cannot justify a man are the works of the Law (Rom 3:28; 9:32). Indeed, no work of man can cleanse him of sin (see note Rom 3:20). Paul however, is not discouraging a man from doing works of Love, but discouraging him from doing works of the Law. Likewise, James is not encouraging a man to do the works of the Law, but encouraging him to do the works of Love (James 2:24; Gal 5:6). Consistently then, James cites Abraham and Rahab (antecedents of the Law) as examples of works of faith leading to justification.

     As with any literary work, a reader must first understand the writer’s terms before he can understand his message. Conflicts between Paul and James are only encountered when using flawed or incomplete definitions of Faith and Grace. Faith is not some elixir placed in the soul of the elect, but a general ability that God has designed and placed in the mind of every man. It is a conscious decision which results in an action that is pleasing to God (Heb 11:6). Grace meanwhile, is not God’s unmerited favor poured out arbitrarily upon certain men without their knowledge or choice, and all while living in wickedness (Jude 1:4), but God’s power in the lives of those who have chosen to yield their wills to their Savior.

     If Abraham’s faith gained him right-standing with God, why then did God send the Law? Why didn’t He continue in this same righteousness of faith for man’s justification? It’s a tough but critical question, and the answer will help to color our understanding of faith, grace and justification. First, we should not infer from this verse that Abraham was justified in the same manner, nor to the same degree, as persons under the New Covenant. Until the death and resurrection of the Son of God, full and authentic forgiveness and justification was neither available nor possible. Even the saints under the Old Covenant were not made perfect until the Perfecter came (study Heb 11:13, 39-40). That’s why Jesus said that Abraham rejoiced to see [His] day (John 8:56, also my note on Mat 27:53). This point is supported by the word choice of the verse in question: it was counted unto him for righteousness. God reckoned Abraham to be righteous while he yet lived, but he was not truly made righteous until that Christ-only action was performed. And that is not so different from our own experience in the New Covenant. For while we are forgiven, redeemed and born again immediately upon placing our faith in Christ, a fuller realization awaits the soul in the heavens, when Redemption is completed (Luke 21:28) and all things are truly made new (Rev 21:5).

     Another reason God interposed the Age of Law instead of continuing in the Abrahamic mode of righteousness is that the latter is more difficult. Witness the example of the children of Israel passing through the wilderness (Rom 3:1-3). They saw the mighty miracles of God in their deliverance from Egypt, they experienced the awesome display of power at the Red Sea, the pillar of cloud and fire leading the way, the water flowing from the Rock, the manna, etc. Yet they complained and distrusted, rebelled and rejected the works of God! All this happened before the giving of the Law at Sinai, where they so wickedly turned from Jehovah that they had Aaron make them a new god to worship. Amazing unbelief, incredible anti-faith. These all died in the wilderness, and could not enter into the Promised Land on account of their unbelief (Heb 3:15-19).

     The Big Deal, or Big Change, with the New Covenant is the gift of the Holy Spirit in the personal life of the believer. That changes everything (John 16:7). The Spirit did move mightily in the Old Testament, but now, on account of the full work of justification wrought by Christ, He comes to live in the heart of every Christian. He helps them to understand the Scriptures, to discern what is right and wrong, to better know Christ and the Father, and to help the person to do the will of God (Rom 8:26). Not that the Holy Spirit takes control of the believer and that everything is now easy and simple, but that He is a serious help and advantage to gaining that righteousness which is of faith. The power of the Holy Spirit is a principle theme in the book of Romans; the peak is in chapter eight.

4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

     A paraphrase translation of verses 3-4: “He that can present acceptable works earns his reward; it is not gifted but paid. On the other hand, he that cannot present acceptable works, but simply trusts the One who is able to make holy the wicked man, his faith is counted to be righteousness.” Note, man’s own faith (not Christ’s) is counted for righteousness. Also note, grace here means “gift,” as contrasted with debt (as in 1Pet 3:7; Acts 20:24). Finally, the only acceptable works which are valid for justification is the Atoning work of Christ.

     Those who would offer their good works as a way to buy salvation are doomed to fail, for sin cannot be undone by doing good deeds. Even a human court of law would agree. So Abraham did not, could not, work and so earn his righteousness (Rom 11:35); it was imputed/counted/reckoned unto him because of his faith in God. Perhaps the distinction is subtle but it nevertheless important: Abraham gained (did not earn) salvation by his faith. No man can earn by his works the righteousness that saves, but he can attain that righteousness from God by his faith. And by “Faith” we mean the full biblical expression of saving faith (see note Mat 14:31).

     Calvinists have made this passage to say that works and obedience are not necessary for salvation, but the teaching of many other passages renders that notion entirely untenable. Just two chapters earlier Paul said that every man that worketh good will receive glory, honor and peace, but that tribulation and anguish will befall every soul of man that doeth evil (Rom 2:6-10). Good works will unerringly accompany salvation. The Apostle records that he had received grace and apostleship for the purpose of calling men unto obedience to the faith (Rom 1:5). Calvinists choose to ignore the obvious intent of this chapter by magnifying one of its details: namely, that contrary to the teaching of Judaism and many other religions, personal holiness cannot be earned by works. God reckons a man to be holy on account of his personal faith in Christ. He takes a man’s faith and imputes it as righteousness to his account.

     Initial faith, or believing, does not finish the salvation unto man, but qualifies him for salvation. Again, God imputes/reckons a man to be righteousness on account of his faith, which demonstrates that salvation is not earned by man but gifted by God. On the other hand, all through the Scriptures we see Man receiving God’s grace because he did something. There is not one exception! In the Genesis passage under discussion, God came to Abraham and said, I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward (Gen 15:1). He didn’t say “gift,” “freedom,” “grace,” etc, but reward. A reward is given for a certain achievement or action. In my opinion, the most dangerous of all “Christian” beliefs is the idea that God’s grace of salvation is gifted irrespective of man’s choice or action in the matter. The companion belief is just a dangerous, that God places faith in certain men and justifies them without their knowledge or choice, and these are the elect. God is righteous, fair and wise; so He would never act arbitrarily or unjustly.

     A God that can govern/exist only in a setting where He alone decides and acts would be a diminutive, limited one, and very contrary to the Scriptural description of the God who designed and created Man for fellowship – voluntary, optional, free-will fellowship, for that is the very highest kind. The God that can rule and ultimately prevail in such a setting is truly the Omnipotent, Omniscient One.

     That justifieth the ungodly. All have sinned, all have taken their own ways, all are ungodly (Rom 3:10-12), but Christ came to save sinful men. On the other hand, God will not justify the wicked (Ex 23:7). He chooses those to justify according to their faith (Rom 5:1).

6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, 7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.

     There is probably no better description of the state of justification than this Davidic declaration: Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven…to whom the Lord will not impute sin (Ps 32:1-2). Such an one is at peace with God, for his soul is completely cleansed and his sins have been taken away. Yet, the very notion of guilt being removed is beyond human comprehension; it is impossible. Once guilty, always guilty. No work of man can undo that sin. How exceedingly happy, then, is the man who receives this blessedness!

     Righteousness without works restates the case of Abraham, who found righteousness by faith and not by works, which refers chiefly to the deeds of the Law as the next verses will detail. Following the Law will not result in justification. Righteousness is only imputed to persons in proportion to their own faith in Christ. If that be taken by the Protestants to be a “works-based” salvation, so be it.

     Forgiveness of sin is never free. Every person who forgives a debt is agreeing to suffer the consequences/damages incurred by the debtor. In the case of God and Man, Jesus paid the debt of every man’s sins, from the first man, Adam, unto the last man who asks for God’s forgiveness before the Lord’s return. In a world of perfect Justice, which is where God exists, mercy/forgiveness cannot be the overlooking of an offense! There must be an in-kind balancing of the scales, or the case is an injustice. Even as humans, our minds are intrinsically affronted to see a judge pardon a guilty man. And that makes perfect sense with the statement that Abraham’s faith was reckoned to him for righteousness.

9 Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. 10 How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. 11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also: 12 And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.

     Since faith was counted for righteousness to Abraham before the Law was given, it could not have been tied to doing works of the Law. Even circumcision, the most important of all Jewish rites, was not yet in existence. From this fact the Apostle extracts that God had planned for Abraham to be the father of all them that believe, both of the circumcision and the uncircumcision. It was hidden from human understanding for many centuries, for during the Old Covenant era the God-designed and implemented mode of salvation was to keep the Judaic Law. Theoretically, a true God-seeker like Abraham could have been born outside of the Jewish nation, but such a person would come to know that the Mosaic worship system was the divinely instituted way to God. Gentiles could (and did) enter by adoption into the Jewish religion.

     God enacted the rite of circumcision with Abraham as a seal or evidence that Abraham would receive the blessings that He had promised to him. From that time on, the family of Abraham would perform this sign until the fulfillment of God’s promise that Abraham would become the father of many nations and that in his seed all the nations of the world would be blessed (Gen 17:4-5; 22:18; 26:4). This was realized at the coming of Christ and His new Kingdom, open to all who believe on Him.

     Under the New Covenant, literal circumcision is no longer required (1Cor 7:19; Gal 5:6), but a spiritual circumcision of the heart (Rom 2:29; Col 2:11). That is a conspicuous fact against the idea that certain Old Testament commandments continue mandatory in the New Covenant. Keeping the Sabbath is the biggest point of contention and the primary argument is that God’s command to keep the Sabbath pre-dates the Mosaic Law. Well, so does the commandment to be circumcised. 

     Abraham is the father of all men of true Faith, the uncircumcised and the circumcised; but only if they also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham. Again the Calvinist idea that no work is necessary to attain salvation is shown to be faulty. Every man, Jew or Gentile, must be found faithfully doing the will of God or he will not receive the promises. That is abundantly clear in these verses.

13 For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:

     The promises of God are experienced by Abraham and his seed spiritually through Christ and not physically through blood lineage (Gal 3:16, 29). They are not given on account of fulfilling the righteousness of the Law, but through this righteousness of faith that Abraham has found (see previous verses). These two modes of righteousness clash throughout the book of Romans (Rom 2:6; 4:11; 8:4; 9:31; 10:5), and are contrasted in Paul’s hope to be found in Him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the Law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith (Php 3:9).

     With the New Covenant, God instituted the righteousness of Faith which has its roots in events that pre-date the Law. In one sense then, this mode of righteousness bypasses the era of the Law, and the Abrahamic promises can thus be extended to all of his seed in the spiritual sense. That is the subject of chapter 9 and the practical purpose of the book of Galatians. This parallels the case of Christ, who came a priest after the order of Melchisedek (pre-Law), thus bypassing the Aaronic line (Heb 7). Yet this does not mean the Law was an unfortunate experiment in human history. In that era before the Atonement of Christ and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, finding God by following the Mosaic Covenant was an easier task than than finding Him through the righteousness of faith (see note verse 3). 

     The promise made of none effect. The promises were either realized in the Judaic Covenant or in the New Covenant. In this chapter, Paul shows that the promises were given to Abraham based upon the righteousness of faith in God and not upon the righteousness that is found in keeping the Law. Study also Gal 3:17-19. In what sense did Abraham become the heir of the world? Jesus said that the meek will inherit the earth (Mat 5:5), but perhaps the primary thought is of the world to come (Luke 18:30; Eph 3:21). That was the big country which Abraham sought after (Heb 11:16).

15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. 16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

     Three categories, or estates, of being an heir of the promises are presented in these verses: Man under the Law, Man ignorant of the Law, Man in the righteousness of faith. The first ends in wrath, for we have seen that while the Law brings the knowledge of sin to Man (Rom 3:20; 7:7-9) it cannot cleanse his corrupted soul (Gal 3:21; Heb 10:4). The second ends short of receiving the promises too, for while sin is not imputed where there is no law (Rom 5:13), ignorance cannot attain salvation (Eph 4:18); even the Gentiles were given a law of nature (Rom 2:14). The third condition is blessed, which is the righteousness of faith that makes the promises sure to Abraham and all his seed according to faith.

     That it might be by grace. Meaning that the promises are gifted and not earned, which is a restatement of Romans 4:4. Abraham received the promises of faith apart from the Law; clearly then, they are awarded by grace, and not by doing the works of the Law. The Law did give man an opportunity to earn his salvation, but no man could attain it. That fact was demonstrated in chapter 3. Under the New Covenant, salvation is gifted by God to those who follow the righteousness of faith. These are the only ones who will receive the Abrahamic promises (Gal 3:14). Even the salvation of the faithful Old Covenant saints was contingent upon the ratification of this mode of righteousness.

     The Law worketh wrath, but that should not be taken to mean that the Law was bad or wrong (see Rom 3:31; 7:7).

17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were. 18 Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations; according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.

     God’s blessings to Abraham are powerful and striking (see Gen 13:14-16; 17:3-9). Abraham became a father of many nations, before Him whom he believed. God did not choose to bless Abraham arbitrarily! The life of Abraham is filled with fervent devotion and full obedience to God. At His call, Abraham left his family and country, his destination unknown and his means of living uncertain (Heb 11:8). Abraham’s remarkable faith gained him God’s favor, for he lived wholly unto God, following Him without question and at all times, no matter the personal cost. And the last, great evaluation was to ask him to go and sacrifice the very son that God had promised him as a burnt offering. What a test that must have been! It was then that God, by solemn oath, confirmed the promises to Abraham (Gen 22:16-18; Heb 6:13-14). For now I know that thou fearest [Me], seeing thou has not withheld thy son, thine only son from Me (Gen 22:12)

     God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were. At His spoken word, God is able to accomplish what He wills. He can raise the dead, He can call into existence the World from nothing, He can raise up children of Abraham from stones, He can make the Gentiles to be His sons and daughters. This is truly seen in the events that brought the New Covenant unto mankind. An example of God “calling a thing that isn’t as though it already were” is seen in this very verse. God spoke in the past tense when he called Abraham “a father of many nations,” yet long centuries passed before that became a reality.

     Against hope believed in hope. Against all human expectation, Abraham believed anyway. Sarah had passed the age of child-bearing and her womb was dead, but God said that she would bear him a son. Against hope, Abraham believed God and followed Him fully. Sarah, meanwhile, doubted (Gen 18:11-12). In the Greek, the word hope carries the sense of expecting, trusting, assurance. It is one of the top three Christian qualities (1Cor 13:13). In Heb 10:23 the same word is translated “faith”).

19 And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb: 20 He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; 21 And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. 22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.

     Much time passed after God had promised Abraham that his seed would be as the dust of the earth for number (Gen 13:15-16). Abraham waited patiently, continuing to trust God. Year after year his faith did not weaken; he was fully persuaded that God would perform what he had promised. As Abraham neared his 100th year, God came and re-affirmed His promise once again. By then Sarah had passed the age of child-bearing, for it had ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women (Gen 18:11). And then God fulfilled His promise. Isaac was born to Sarah even though it wasn’t physically possible for her to bear a child! Therefore was Abraham’s faith the means of his righteousness (v22).

     This does not accord with Calvinistic theology, which says that justification is God imputing Christ’s righteousness to the believer (i.e. Jesus’ obedience and good works are credited to the elect). That idea is found nowhere in the Word of God and must be dismissed as spurious. Notice here that Abraham’s own faith was credited to him as righteousness (Gen 15:6; Rom 4:3). We believe that justification is the perfect cleansing of a sinner’s soul by God based upon faith in Christ. That is the true gift of righteousness (Rom 5:17); not covering up man’s sins by the cloak of Jesus’ righteousness, but the actual sanctification (making holy) of those who demonstrate by their faith that they are worthy to receive this grace.

     Let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as He is righteous (1John 3:7). With the heart man believeth unto righteousness (Rom 10:10). Awake to righteousness and sin not (1Cor 15:34). That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit (Rom 8:4). The man who seeks divine justification must yield himself a servant unto righteousness and be found so doing when the Master returns. This topic is developed at length in chapter six. Here in chapter four, Paul shows that no man can be perfectly righteous, so no man can earn salvation by his works. Abraham’s righteousness fell short, but God reckoned him to be righteous on account of his faith. That is justification.

23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; 24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; 25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

     The pattern of Abraham being counted righteous on account of his faith is true in the New Covenant era, but with an important distinction: we believe on Him that raised up Jesus. Today, we have the added blessedness of knowing that Christ our Savior accomplished the all-important work of atonement which enabled mercy to triumph over justice (James 2:13). By Christ’s sinless death He gained the just and righteous authority to overpower Satan and buy back all those souls He chooses to save (Col 2:13-15). God wrought man’s salvation in full justice (Rom 3:26), for His mercy was sponsored and approved by the sacrifice of His Son. That is the amazing mechanism of God’s righteousness.

     Christ was delivered for our offences, and raised again for our justification. The two-fold work in the Atonement of Christ for Mankind is implied herein. He was first delivered up as the perfect Sacrifice to redeem us from the clutches of Satan, but He was raised to life with the power to cleanse us from all sin (1John 1:9; 3:5). This is repeated in the next chapter: we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son and saved by His life (Rom 5:10). Together, these two inseparable actions result in the possibility of full reconciliation between God and Man (Rom 5:10). We say “possibility” because many will choose not to be justified and will count the blood of the covenant to be an unclean thing (Heb 10:29). There is no hope of eternal life for these, but fearful judgment and fiery indignation (Heb 10:27). Justification is by faith (man’s part) and by His blood (God’s part). See Rom 5:1, 9.

     Justification has to do with God cleansing the soul of sin and making it fit for communion with Him. Salvation has to do with being redeemed and saved from the Devil. The beautiful truth is that God has performed His promises and the Way of Salvation has been made freely available to every man, woman and child. Christ died for our sins and was raised again for our justification. The Covenant has been duly formed and all has been made ready. It remains for Man to take advantage of this wonderful opportunity and to press into it (Luke 13:24), seeking by all means to attain unto the resurrection of the dead (Php 3:11).

commentary Romans 3

1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? 2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.

     After showing that Jews are not privileged automatically by blood and that circumcision profits nothing if one does not keep the Law (Rom 2:25), the Apostle sets out to show the advantages that Jews do enjoy. First, the divine Word of God was communicated to their race and nation; through the centuries of time the Holy Spirit moved righteous prophets and leaders to record God’s words unto Mankind (2Pet 1:21). Second, God specially blessed the Israelites with the promises, the covenants, the Law and the adoption (Rom 9:4). The Jews had a Godly heritage filled with mighty heroes of faith and power, and they had a marvelous history of experiencing God’s mercies and deliverances – these were facts to admire, to convince the mind of God’s power and to encourage the soul to seek Him. Unfortunately, they became points of pride and false confidence among the Jews of Paul’s day.

     Present-day Anabaptists would be wise to learn from the example of the Jews! We too have a goodly heritage filled with examples of unshakeable faith; men and women of God who loved not their lives unto death, but went to the stake, to the torture chamber and to the river. Today’s Anabaptists, however, are too often found willing to compromise with the world and the same false churches that once killed their forefathers.

3 For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? 4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

     Many Israelites proved to be faithless, even after God had miraculously provided for them and worked wonders of deliverance. They murmured against God, disobeyed and tempted Him. For their faithlessness (or unbelief), God swore that they would not enter into His rest. An extended passage in Hebrews 3:12-4:11 describes this sad example. Did God withdraw His faithfulness from all Israel because of the unfaithfulness of some? No! He remains faithful to those who follow His Covenant, and these will receive the promises.

     The faith of God. God is the object of faith and does not possess faith in the human sense. However, He is faithful, reliable and true (Rev 19:11), which is the apparent intention of this phrase. He is the faithful God (Deut 7:9). In the Greek, the root word for faith and unbelief is the same (pistis, apistia) and that is true throughout the Scriptures. However, “unfaith” is not a word, so the Greek antonyms are not seen in the English translation.

     Did not believe (apisteo) is the verb form of the same Greek root word that is usually translated faith, and its antonym is pisteuo. For that reason some versions (NIV) translate this phrase, did not have faith. The Biblical terms faith and believe have the same Greek words, but one is a noun and the other a verb. That doesn’t mean that having faith and believing are equivalent terms, but without doubt they are related. Faith has a not by sight component (2Cor 5:7; Heb 11:1). To believe, on the other hand, usually results from seeing with the eyes (John 2:23; 4:48; 20:29). Additionally, faith must be corroborated by actions that demonstrate one’s stated belief, and it also must be maintained unto term. The Israelites in the wilderness failed at this point.

Some theologians and scholars claim that God puts faith into the individual and then he can be saved. By this they attempt to make sure that no work can be attributed to man which might mean salvation was earned instead of gifted by grace. Their idea cannot stand before the character of God, who would have all men to be saved (2Pet 3:9), yet many will not. If salvation were entirely a matter of God putting faith in a man, why does He not put faith in all men? The fact is, God does not put saving faith in certain men, but has put the necessary components of Faith in all men. It is up to every man to choose faith in Christ or reject Him.It is up to every man to choose to have faith in Christ or to reject Him. The Faith that saves comes by hearing the Gospel (Gal 3:2; Rom 10:17). Certainly God is the source and origin of all Faith (Gal 5:22), but make no mistake, saving Faith must be developed voluntarily in the human mind and heart. Believe and be saved (Luke 8:12) is man’s part. I say that the faith these theologians propose is a fake of deceit; fake because God secretly did it Himself, and deceit because it really isn’t faith at all.

     The quote is from David’s prayer of repentance as recorded in the Septuagint, Against thee only have I sinned, and done evil before thee: that thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged (Ps 51:4, LXX). David recognized that his actions had transgressed the sayings of God given to Moses in the Law. His confession showed that God was just and righteous, yea, that God would always prevail over all foes in matters of truth and righteousness. “Your sayings show You to be holy and righteous, therefore You will prevail over every accusation.”

5 But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man) 6 God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world? 7 For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? 8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just. 9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; 10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

     The main thrust of this chapter is to show that every man (except for Christ) has fallen into sin and failed to seek God. Instead, all have followed their own way in the world. All are guilty of sin. A facetious person however, might attempt to say God is unjust for judging Man, seeing that everyone is simply acting as all men have always acted. The present verses address that false charge. My paraphrase of verses 3-10:

What about those Jews in the wilderness who proved to be faithless? Does their unfaithfulness indicate that God’s faithful guidance was in vain? Absolutely not! God is always right and true, independent of Man’s faith. For it is written: “Your Word shows You to be righteous and just, so that when You are accused You always come forth victorious.”

What shall we conclude upon seeing God’s righteousness in the face of Man’s constant unrighteousness – is God unjust for punishing Mankind? That cannot be, for “God will judge the world in perfect righteousness.”

Some even say (it is slanderously claimed that I teach this), “Since God is shown to be so perfectly righteous by my unrighteousness, then surely He will not judge me for being a sinner! So why not do evil, seeing that the goodness of God is made more evident by my wicked acts?” The condemnation of these teachers is coming, and it will be deservedly just.

Should we then conclude that Gentiles are better advantaged than Jews? No, for we have proven both to be equally guilty of sin. As it is written, “There is none that is righteous, no, not even one.”

     The Apostle here frustrates the theology of many Protestants by verbalizing their faulty argument: “A man is unrighteous because he is Man; he is totally depraved and has no choice but to sin. How then can God judge him for sinning? He cannot! Besides, God’s glory is enhanced by man’s wickedness, for it shows Him to be so much better than they. Man’s works are filthy rags and have nothing to do with salvation, so let us do evil, that good may come.” The gravity of this false teaching cannot be over-emphasized. Paul says their damnation is just. Any theology which concludes that God does not look with favor upon man’s good works is not rightly dividing the Word of Truth. The Apostle speaks more about this error in Romans 9:18-21.

     God does not make men sinners, nor does He call them righteous when they are not. He has carefully explained how He judges the righteous and the wicked (see especially the detailed account in Ezekiel 33:11-20). The righteous man will die if he begins to forsake his righteous ways and commit iniquity, and the wicked man will live if he forsakes his wicked ways and lives righteously. That is the way of Faith! Hearing, believing, accepting, doing, persevering. Obviously, no man can live a sinless life, and that is why he must humbly request the services of the Advocate, whose forgiveness is equally effective for the wicked who decides to turn from his evil ways as for the righteous man who returns after falling (1John 2:1). Here is the great power and advantage of the New Covenant, for under the Old there was not sufficient basis for God to forgive man’s sins. The sacrifices served as an interim measure which looked forward to the moment that the sufficient Sacrifice was made.

11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. 12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. 13 Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: 14 Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: 15 Their feet are swift to shed blood: 16 Destruction and misery are in their ways: 17 And the way of peace have they not known: 18 There is no fear of God before their eyes.

     This is a recitation of the Septuagint version of Psalms 14:1-3, “The fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They have corrupted themselves, and become abominable in their devices; there is none that does goodness, there is not even so much as one. The Lord looked down from heaven upon the sons of men, to see if there were any that understood, or sought after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become good for nothing, there is none that does good, no not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness; their feet are swift to shed blood: destruction and misery are in their ways; and the way of peace they have not known: there is no fear of God before their eyes.”

     The Masoretic text does not contain the last sentence, but it is found elsewhere in virtually verbatim form (see Ps 53:1-3; 5:9; 140:3; 10:7; 36:1 and Is 59:7-8). All of these passages show the universality of sin and wickedness in Mankind, and especially condemn the Jews (to whom they were written). They bolster Paul’s next point, that man cannot be saved by following the Mosaic Law. If even the prophets and upright under the Law admit that none are righteous and that all have left the right path to follow wickedness, what can we conclude but that the Law could not save them?

     On the other hand, God said Noah was righteous before Me (Gen 7:1), and counted Abraham to be righteousness (Gen 15:6). Furthermore, he indicated that Noah, Daniel and Job were capable of delivering their souls by their righteousness (Eze 14:14). The Psalms are filled with references to “the righteous man” (ie Ps 1:6; 14:5; 68:3; 94:21, etc). These men were true seekers of God without a doubt. So we must be careful to read these verses in their present context and not erroneously extrapolate them to unintended meanings. Nevertheless, it stands unequivocally evident that all men have corrupted their way upon the earth (Gen 6:12), and that there is none that are perfectly righteous, no not one. All have sinned, even Noah, Daniel and Job. For there is not a just man upon the earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not (Ec 7:20). That is the crucial point, for God cannot abide in the presence of sin. He is perfectly holy, righteous and just. For God and mankind to be reconciled in full fellowship, this discrepancy must be rectified.

19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

     The Law of Moses was the framework for God’s Covenant with man under the Old Testament and its significance in that era cannot be over-stated. The people were required to keep not just the moral rules of the Ten Commandments but also the multitudinous details contained in many rites, assemblies and feasts. The Law ruled, and by it all the world (became) guilty before God. This apparently means “all the Jewish world,” for “the Law speaks to them who are under the Law.” The nations of the world are excluded. And that is consistent with the Apostle’s conclusion earlier in this epistle, where he finds all the world guilty before God under two frames: the Jew for not keeping the Law and the Gentiles for not keeping the law of their conscience (Rom 2:12).

     During the times of this ignorance, God did not require of other nations the same level of righteousness, but now that true knowledge has been communicated and committed to all, He requires all men every where to repent (Acts 17:30). The next chapters will compare the two Covenants (the Law of Moses and the Law of Faith) to show that in reality, even the Old Covenant law was, at its core, a law of faith. It will also become evident that the Law of Faith supersedes and fulfills the Old Law.

20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

     The Law did not provide a practical remedy for Sin (Rom 8:3-4), although it did propose one. If a man were to keep every detail of the Law, he would be shown to be righteous and just. That has been shown to be impossible, for no man can keep the law. Even if he were to keep the whole law but offend in one point, he is guilty of all (James 2:10). So, truly the Apostle says of the Law, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God (v19). The Law showed what is sin, and by the Law is the knowledge of sin spread through the whole world.

     The Old Covenant did provide an interim solution to the sin problem in the form of cleansing rituals and sacrifices. Those acts of penitence provided a covering for those sins, but it is not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sin (Heb 10:4). The souls of the OT saints would have to wait until the right blood was shed and then their sins could be truly taken away (Heb 11:40). Appropriately, the Hebrew word kaphar means “to atone, to cover.” The ark of Noah was covered (kaphar) with pitch so that it would not sink on its watery journey to the new world.

     It is evident then, that by the deeds of the Law no man can be justified, for doing good deeds will never undo bad deeds already committed. And every man is guilty of bad deeds, especially the Jews (see v10-18). Paul said to the Antiochian Jews, Ye could not be justified by the Law of Moses…but by (Christ) all that believe are justified from all things (Acts 13:39). To be justified and to be saved are essentially synonymous actions of God. Justification seems to emphasize the very act of cleansing a man’s soul of sinfulness, for the word really means “to be made holy” (see Rom 2:13). Salvation emphasizes the condition of being accepted in the beloved, grafted into the vine of Christ. The word really means “to be healed, preserved, made whole.”

21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

     The core concept of these verses is: “The righteousness of God coupled with the Law could not cleanse (justify) any man of his sins, but now the righteousness of God without the Law has come; namely, Jesus Christ who the Law and prophets foretold. And by faith in Him any man can be cleansed completely (justified freely) by His grace on account of the ransom Christ has paid.”

     Two key aspects of the Atonement are here portrayed: The taking away of sin from a man’s soul, and the deliverance of a man’s soul from the power of Satan. These dual concepts correspond to two actions Christ performed at His death and resurrection (see Rom 4:25). They are essential for Man to be reconciled to God. See my treatise on the Atonement for this subject.   

     The New Covenant righteousness, which came without the Law, was nevertheless witnessed by the Law and the prophets (v21). These types, shadows and prophecies were hidden from Jewish understanding until after Christ’s resurrection. But with the transforming of their minds came the knowledge of new truths, and their hearts burned within them as the Scriptures were opened unto spectacular confirmation (Luke 24:27, 32). The New Testament is filled with analogies, symbols and spiritual language from the Law and the prophets. However, our modern, western minds often miss their beauty and meaning. Careful, deep study will find beautiful treasures in the Word (Mat 13:52).

     For there is no difference. Jew or Gentile, all have sinned and fallen short. The Scripture hath concluded all under sin (Gal 3:22). Thus, no man can save himself. His sins have disqualified him. He can do nothing to re-instate himself into righteousness. From his perspective, his condition is hopeless.

     Justified freely by His grace. These are wonderful words to the ears of every man. Man is not required to earn his cleansing from sin. Praise God, for no man would then be saved (see previous verses). Only by ignoring the rest of Scripture might a person infer from this verse that man does nothing at all, and that God arbitrarily decides to make one man holy (justify him) but chooses to leave another man unholy. Through faith in His blood a man is chosen for salvation (v25). Faith is a work that man must accomplish or he will not receive God’s grace, he will not be made holy, he will not be redeemed (1Thes 1:3; John 6:29; Mat 14:31). This is the law of Faith (v27) that the Apostle Paul holds forth to his readers in this chapter. A law requires acts of obedience, a faith requires acts of evidence. A covenant is an two-party agreement. Both sides agree to its terms and both sides must work to keep the terms. God is always faithful and will always keep His side.

     Grace is often falsely construed to be a quality in God that allows Him to disregard a man’s sinfulness. “Saved by grace.” Actually, grace is God’s power in the life of a person who has shown himself to be worthy. Not that he has earned God’s grace, but that he has shown his heart to be after God (2Chr 16:9). It is absurdity to think that God would create a World in which Man can act as he wishes and “be saved by grace.” That is essentially the theology of many Protestants. The Scriptures show that God chose to save Noah because he deserved it (Gen 6:8) and that is true for every person in any age. See Rom 11:6.

     Some commentators have thought Paul and James disagreed on whether it is faith that justifies a man, or works. That is not true. The works that Paul say cannot justify man are the works of the Law (Rom 3:28; 9:32), while the works James says do justify a man are the good works that evidence his confession of belief on Christ (James 2:24). See my note for Romans 4:3.

25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; 26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

     The wide variation of Bible versions demonstrates the difficulty of translating these two verses from the original language. The largest point of discrepancy is the meaning of the Greek word hilasterion, which the KJV translates “propitiation,” and the NIV “sacrifice of atonement.” Those translations stray far from the actual usage of that word elsewhere in the Greek Scriptures. In Hebrews 9:5 it is translated mercy seat in reference to the lid upon the Ark of the Covenant and that is its common meaning in the Septuagint (see Ex 25:17-22).

     According to Webster’s old English dictionary, a propitiation is “the act of appeasing wrath…atoning sacrifice offered to God to assuage His wrath and render Him propitious to sinners.” While that idea was undoubtedly part of the Judaic sacrificial offerings (see note on Rom 5:11), the fact is that nowhere in the Greek Bible, Old or New Testament, does hilasterion even approximate that usage or definition. According to Strong’s, the word is formed from hilaskomai and thusiasterion. The first word means “to be favorably disposed or merciful,” and the second word signifies an “altar.” The Septuagint translators consistently used hilasterion for the Hebrew word for mercy seat (kapporeth), which is related to kaphar (to atone or cover), so Paul’s Jewish audience would certainly have heard, “mercy seat,” and not, “propitiation.”

     Obviously, Jesus is not the literal mercy seat in the Jewish temple, so the translators sought to give the spiritual meaning of the term. While that technique is common in the other Bible translations, it is very out of character for the KJV, which follows a word-for-word rendering that requires the reader to study out deeper meanings. For that reason alone the KJV will always hold the top position in Bible translations. Consider for example, the words of Psalm 18:2, “God is the horn of my salvation.” What does it mean? Fortunately for us, the KJV consistently translates that word throughout the Old Testament so by comparative reading we quickly understand that the Psalmist means, “power” (see Ps 148:14; Jer 48:25). In fact, I would guess that any English speaking person familiar with the Bible knew immediately the figurative meaning of “horn.” Yet, when I learned Spanish, I was shocked and disappointed that Spanish Bibles do not read “horn” in those passages, but “power.” Without going to the original Hebrew, a Spanish person will never know of this symbolism. It was a calculated action by later updaters, for the original Casiodoro Bible does read “horn.” The KJV is a beautiful, largely literal translation of the original Scriptures. Our appreciation for it is deepened by minor anomalies such as this one in Rom 3:25.

     In the original languages, the term mercy seat is related to mercy, forgiveness and grace. Jesus Christ is a hilasterion in that He is the means whereby we might obtain mercy. Some scholars stress the point that Jesus’ death averted the wrath of God upon sinners and in that sense the Atonement appeased God. I don’t disagree. Yes, God’s wrath will fall upon all those wicked men who are not saved by the blood of His Son (Rev 6:17; Rom 5:9; 1Thes 1:10), but that is not the central truth or meaning of hilasterion.

     The Ark of the Covenant was made of three parts, the Ark (or chest), the Mercy Seat (lid) and the Cherubim (statue of angels) above. The final two articles, the Mercy Seat and the Cherubim, were made of one beaten piece of gold. Only the High Priest was allowed to view the Ark of the Covenant, and just once every year, upon the observance of the most sacred, solemn rite of Judaic worship system known as the Day of Atonement. The ceremony required the High Priest to take the blood of a bullock and a goat behind the vail into the Holy of Holies and sprinkle it seven times upon the mercy seat. I remember my Grandpa teaching on this beautiful Old Testament shadow of the cross, “The Passover typifies the blood of Christ shed, but the Atonement typifies the blood of Christ accepted at the heavenly throne of God.” The death of Christ opened the heavenly doors of mercy and grace unto Mankind.

     My thought translation of these verses:

“Whom God has set forth to be a Mercyseat (means of obtaining mercy) by faith in His blood, and thereby show His righteousness by the forgiveness of sins previously committed, through the longsuffering of God. This action declares even now His righteousness in that He is just and the Justifier of the one that has faith in Jesus.”

God, not acting in accordance to the just merits of man’s deeds but according to His longsuffering and mercy, has ordained a Mercyseat whereby a man can be forgiven of the sins he has committed. That is the meaning of this verse, in my view, for it conforms perfectly with the context of this passage and especially the next verse.

     The remission of sins that are past. Not the sins of the present and future as the Calvinists teach, but past sins – sins that are past. It is utterly anti-Biblical to think that upon a person’s initial salvation, God would sign a waiver affirming that this man has already achieved eternal life and that no sinful act will ever separate Him from God. Again, the structural basis of a Covenant is a pact between two parties (a man and God) agreeing to certain terms that both will respect and keep. See Mat 21:43.

     Which believeth in Jesus. The Greek is in noun form and so would probably be better translated, “which has faith in Jesus.”

27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

     We showed in the note on the previous verse that God, acting in longsuffering and mercy, has provided a Mercyseat whereby man can be forgiven of his sins. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. Why? Because justification has been shown to be an act of God’s mercy entirely apart from doing the deeds of the Law. No man can boast that he has earned his salvation or has saved himself (Eph 2:9). Some of Paul’s audience were nevertheless trying to gain salvation by following the Old Covenant (Rom 2:17; 3:19-20; 9:31-32). Therefore, his next case will be to show that even under the OC a man was not justified by his works alone, but that faith was also required. The life of Abraham is a prime example.

     Justification is simply the full forgiveness of a man’s sins such that he can enter again into right communion with his Maker. It means that a man has been cleansed, purified and made holy before God. Justification is entirely God’s work and he has fore-ordained and communicated to us the criteria for choosing who will be justified – him which believeth in Jesus (v26). Or in the words of the present verse, those who follow the Law of Faith, which is a completely new Way, entirely separate from following the deeds of the Law. This is the fully-mature Faith that saves, and not just a general profession of belief in Christ. It is a law of faith, the New Covenant, a code of principles and stipulations, the faith which was once delivered unto the saints (Jude 1:3; Rom 1:5). See my notes for Mat 14:31.

     In his German translation of the Bible, the heretic Martin Luther famously added a word to this verse that is not found in the Greek: A man is justified by faith alone without the deeds of the Law. When confronted by his Catholic enemies of this interpolation his argument included the following:

“If your papists wish to make a great fuss about the word “alone”, say this to him: ‘Dr. Martin Luther will have it so and he says that a papist and an ass are the same thing.’ I will it, I command it; my will is reason enough. I can exegete the psalms and prophets, and they cannot. I can translate, and they cannot. I can read Holy Scriptures, and they cannot. I can pray, they cannot…Please do not give these asses any other answer to their useless braying about that word “sola” than simply, ‘Luther will have it so, and he says that he is a doctor above all the papal doctors.’ I will, from now on, hold them in contempt, and have already held them in contempt, as long as they are the kind of people that they are – asses, I should say. And there are brazen idiots among them who have never learned their own art of sophistry – like Dr. Schmidt and Snot-Nose, and such like them” (Martin Luther, “Open letter on Translating”).

     Luther rejected all good works on the part of a Christian. He wrote, “There is no scandal greater, more dangerous, more venomous, than a good outward life, manifested by good works and a pious mode of life. That is the grand portal, the highway, that leads to damnation.” Dig into Luther’s writings (which are not readily available in English) and you will be shocked and disgusted at his arrogant attitude, filthy mouth, blasphemous statements, heretical teaching and wicked lifestyle. He is a disgrace to Christianity.

29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: 30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. 31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

     There is one God who justifies all, Jew and Gentile, by this same law of faith. Paul then asks, “Has the Old Testament Law been shown to be of no good use?” Not at all. The Law was good and right for its time, and even now continues to be highly useful in pointing both Jew and Gentile to the one and only God of creation. But now, Christ’s law of faith has replaced the law of Moses (Heb 8:13). Christ fulfilled the requirements of the Law and also the types and shadows of His new work, thereby establishing the Law.

commentary Romans 2

1 Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things. 2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things.

     He who condemns another for a sin that he also is committing only judges himself. That fact is asserted forcefully in this chapter (see Rom 2:21-23), and the cogent result is to distinctly advise all men of the weight of their sins (Rom 3:23). Jews and Greeks are equally inexcusable, equally guilty before the Judge: the Jews failed to follow the Law that they were given by God, and the Gentiles failed to follow the law of their conscience, also given to them by God.

     This is true in the legal sense also. No man is able to pronounce another to be “guilty of sin” because both are sinners. The judge must recuse, for his judgment is inadmissible on the grounds of similar trespass and guilt. God’s judgment, on the other hand, is perfect, righteous and according to truth, for He alone is absolutely good and sinless. This concept is important to retain fresh in the mind for those involved in church administration and also in personal relationships. Judging another to be guilty of sin is serious business (Rom 14:4). The correct approach is to eschew offering my judgment in favor of rightly and soberly sharing God’s judgment (see note Mat 7:1). For example, do not condemn the one living in adultery by offering your own views, but specify rather what God has said in His Word (Heb 13:4, for one example).

     The Christian’s commission is to preach and do the Law of Christ, not to sit as judge of others (James 4:11). Certainly the church is tasked with making determinations of sin, for we have been given the book of His law and charged to know it and keep it (John 12:48). So in that sense we do judge (1Cor 5:3), but always according to righteous judgment (John 7:24). However, the ground and manner of human judgment is limited (as we have tried to explain above). Judge nothing before the time, for Christ will bring to light the hidden things of darkness and every intention of men’s hearts (1Cor 4:5). That judgment is far more serious than any censure of church or man. Let us then be careful to warn the wayward of that awful and inescapable tribunal.

3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? 4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?

     Hypocrisy is perhaps the most serious condition of sin to be found in any person or church. People who teach the importance of living a righteous life and require it of others must themselves live in such manner, or the judgment of God will fall upon them with great weight (Mat 21:44). Virtually the entire 23rd chapter of Matthew is dedicated to Jesus’ condemnation of the self-righteous, hypocritical Pharisees.

     Hypocrisy is actually a form of rebellion. These people possess full knowledge of the truth yet do not regard it. Instead, they reveal just how little they value the mercy and goodness of God, which has been revealed in shining clarity by the blood of Christ shed for the forgiveness of their sins. The condition of willfully living in sin is soberly expressed in Hebrews 10:26, which describes the sore punishment of the man who treads underfoot the law of Christ and disgraces His holy covenant (Heb 10:29-31). Thinkest… that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? Answer: I tell you NAY: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish (Luke 13:3).

5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God; 6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:

     Every hypocrite, and every rebellious man, and also every deceived person are in high danger of hell-fire. All three are in the same category. They know the Truth but are not doing it. Their continuing willful acts of sin simply increase their debt of sin unto greater and greater punishment, just as the good acts of the righteous are laying up for them treasures in heaven (Mat 6:20). The next few verses will more fully develop this dichotomy.

     Two words in this verse should be especially alarming for any wavering Christian: “thy hardened and unrepentant heart.” Breaking free of those two chains is a very difficult battle! Once indulged and tolerated for a time, the pleasures of sin grip the heart ever more tightly, and if it is not soon broken, by and by it becomes impossible to renew them again unto repentance (Heb 6:6). The Devil works relentlessly and cleverly to choke out the Word once sown by tempting the Christian with all manner of lusts, cares and deceit (Mark 4:19). So take heed for your soul, the Apostle warns in Heb 3:13, lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. The heat of the sun slowly turns soft mud into hard bricks, so also will the constant exposure of a tender soul to acts of wickedness eventually make it hard as stone. The Pharisees are a case in point. Their continued hypocrisy hardened their hearts until they became abject reprobates to all truth and Christ. The Christian must take this warning seriously and personally, for it is very hard to view oneself without bias in the severe light of reality and truth (see 1Cor 11:28).  

     At the last day, the righteous wrath of God will be revealed in judgment against all men who have disregarded His call to repentance and salvation. He will appear in wondrous glory to render just recompense to every man according to his deeds. (Mat 25:46). This sober warning has been virtually negated by many self-appointed, so-called theologians, who have by many devious tricks explained away those verses which warn of Hell and Eternal Judgment. If the Word of God was intended to be understandable, then they are fatally wrong and have deceived many into selling their souls eternally unto Satan. I recall the story of a man who dreamed he had died and gone to Hell, where he found all to be so terrible true: fire, torment, wailing and regret. Inert bodies lay everywhere, face down in the never-dying embers, and he ran from one to the next, looking intently into every face. Finally someone asked him what he was doing, and he said, “I’m looking for that preacher who told me there was no such place as this. He’s here too, I know.”

7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life: 8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,

     Two classes of people are here described. Those who seek to inherit eternal life by following the path of Faith, and those who choose to follow the path of anti-Faith. Do the deeds we have done in the flesh matter to God? Calvinists say NO, but these verses emphatically say, YES. 

     The Greek noun ergon (works, deeds) is repeated in verses 6-7, so we translate:  “God will render to every man according to his deeds: To them who by persevering in good deeds seek for glory, honor and immortality He will give eternal life, but to them who are contentious and disobedient to the truth in following unrighteousness He will render indignation and wrath.” These last two words are used many times in the Greek Scriptures to describe the hot vengeance of God against all unrighteousness. Each is found six times in the Revelation in contexts of God’s great wrath falling upon all who do wickedly. To not obey the truth is to experience the vengeance of flaming fire and the punishment of everlasting destruction at the coming of the Lord (2Thes 1:7-10). 

     How terrible are those two words, “good deeds,” to the minds of many well-intentioned but truth-flawed Christians! Their Protestant theologies make them recoil with horror at the thought of a man seeking to do “good works.” They immediately equate “good works” with “earning one’s salvation,” in spite of the clear fact that this verse doesn’t say that, nor is it what Anabaptists believe. No man can earn his salvation by doing good works because his sins have disqualified him; it is utterly impossible for him to earn salvation. Good deeds cannot undo bad deeds. Just as a man who has killed another is forever a murderer, so too every man is forever a sinner. And no sinner will ever inherit eternal life. The only hope of any man to be saved is to find someone to save him – he must have a Savior. Nevertheless, a man’s good deeds are not odious in the sight of God! Re-read Isaiah 64:6 and the surrounding verses if you have heard that text quoted in support of the afore-mentioned fallacy. The Scriptures say that God created man to do good works (Eph 2:10), and that if any man does not evidence them, he will be cast out in the end (Mat 25:30). Good works are everywhere commanded in all sobriety (2Cor 5:10). It is a constantly-encountered Gospel truth that cannot be countervailed, no matter how oft-repeated are the slurs against it.

9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; 10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:

     The two choices presented in the previous verses are repeated, but now the Apostle applies them universally to every soul of man, that is, Jews and Gentiles alike. The same criteria are intoned: He that doeth evil; he that worketh good, and again the words are the same, although they are verbs this time (katergazomai).

11 For there is no respect of persons with God.

     In the New Covenant Age, God does not make difference between the Jew and Greek. This was divinely revealed to Peter by way of special revelation in a thrice-repeated dream accompanied by miraculous signs (Acts 10). It is a concept especially important for some of Paul’s Jewish readers, who thought to avoid judgment by simply being a Jew, one of God’s chosen people (1Pet 1:17; Eph 6:9; Col 3:25). This chapter persuasively demonstrates to the Jewish people that God’s judgments are no longer based upon parentage or any other idea of favoritism. The Truth applies equally to all. Show meritorious character by persevering in well-doing and you will be rewarded with of eternal life; show dishonorable character by following unrighteousness and you will reap indignation and wrath.

12 For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;

     We have just read that every soul of man will be judged according to his deeds done in the body, whether Jew or Greek. The Gentiles, although not having the Law of Moses, had nonetheless sinned by transgressing the law of their conscience and their souls will perish even though they did not have that Law. The Jews, having the Law of Moses, did not obey it and shall likewise perish. Both are guilty before God, but are judged according to separate law sets.

     The word law (nomos) is used in four senses in the New Testament. Usually the intended sense is made obvious by the context, but on some occasions a more careful reading is required. Nomos appears 21 times in this chapter alone and will be frequently found in the coming chapters. Although there are some exceptions, in the book of Romans the word virtually always refers to the Law of Moses, for the purpose of this epistle is to convince the Jews that their Law cannot bring them salvation.

Here are the four meanings of the word law in the Scriptures:

  1. The Law of the Old Testament (John 8:5).
  2. The Law of the New Testament (Gal 6:2).
  3. The Law of God, eternal and never-changing (Rom 8:7).
  4. Law in a variety of general senses, the conscience being the most common (Rom 2:15; Rom 7:23).

     The Law of the Moses was the basic set of rules that God had decided for His Covenant with the people of Israel. When disobedience and high complacency continued without remedy, that covenant came to an end and Christ instituted the New Covenant with updated laws (see note on Mat 5:1).

13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.

     This statement exposes the false notion of some (like Luther) that the Apostle James describes a different Gospel than Paul. Compare James 1:22-25 with Romans 2:13. They are virtually identical. The fundamental truth that James taught is that a Christian must act upon his confession or else his faith is defective. It’s not saving faith. Unfortunately, many evangelicals rely only on selective verses in the Pauline epistles (like Rom 10:9), and fail to hear him fully. The present verse is very strong: hearing and believing alone is not sufficient for justification. It is imperative that one act upon his belief and do what has been commanded (1Tim 4:16). This is the Faith that saves, and this is the wise man whose works shall stand in the last storm (Mat 7:24-27).

     Here, for the first of many times, we encounter the word justified (dikaioo) in the book of Romans. Protestant theologians have devised a special meaning for this word in their theology of salvation, but one which does not conform with its varied usages in the Greek Scriptures. Yet Paul didn’t here coin a new word to teach a new truth; he used an old word to expound an old truth. The adjective form (dikaios) is even more widely used, and appears in this verse too. A study of the Septuagint and New Testament indicates that to be justified is to be made righteous or holy. See Gen 38:26 and Mat 11:19 for first occurrences of dikaioo in the Testaments. Calvinists however, have added a subtle element to the definition that significantly changes its meaning. In their view, to be justified is to be declared righteous or holy. For the difference of one word, the meaning is utterly transformed and now they can claim that justification is only a juridical declaration! Would God declare a man to be righteous when in actuality he is not? The Anabaptist belief is that through the sacrificial death of Christ, God has the authority and power to make a man righteous by taking away his sins (John 1:29; Is 53:4). Jesus didn’t just declare the leper to be clean, but truly cleansed him wholly (Mark 1:40-42).

     Justified and sanctified are virtually synonyms (see 1Cor 6:11). Perhaps justification emphasizes the initial, judicial aspect of salvation, whereas sanctification emphasizes the continuing operation of salvation. 1) What justification does God offer for delivering the elect from the bonds of Satan? The death of His Son justifies their redemption (Rom 4:25; 5:9). 2) What is the means of their sanctification? The body of the Son of God (1Cor 1:30; Heb 10:10). Clearly the two terms have the same grounds.

14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: 15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)

     These verses compare the Gentile who lives honorably by the law of his conscience with the Jew who does not keep the Law of Moses. Since there is no respect of persons with God (v11), He will judge each person with equity, taking into account each one’s differing level of knowledge and ability. The Gentile who respects the law of his conscience (which is written in their hearts from birth), will be judged according to that law. The Jew will be judged according to his obedience to the Law of Moses, which they have been especially privileged to receive. After His resurrection, Jesus apparently announced His victory to the souls in Hades who had lived without knowledge of the Law and certain of them were saved (see notes 1Pet 4:6; 3:19).

     The mind of every person, no matter where he lives nor when he was born, is pre-printed with a simple knowledge of right and wrong. It is the law written in their hearts (see 2Cor 3:2-3; Heb 8:10-11). As a child grows up, the conscience within his mind will be influenced and re-shaped (almost always negatively) by exterior experiences and environments (Tit 1:15). However, that simplest of all rules, “Love God, love thy neighbor,” is universally and intrinsically born in the human mind. Even the evolutionist and atheist cannot escape it. It is one of those basic truths that rules all of life.

     Their thoughts. The word is logismos – the reasonings of their mind either condemn their own actions or approve of them. The conscience is the only law-set to guide those reasonings. The conscience is an important warning-device that God has installed in every human being and we should heed it carefully (1Tim 1:19; 1Pet 3:21; 2Tim 1:3). For more on the Conscience, see note on 1Cor 8:10.

16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.

     The hidden, concealed deeds of all men will be exposed for everyone to see in the day that God comes to judge the world (v6). This warning is especially important for the hypocrites, who are a major target in this chapter. Maybe their sins will not be seen in this life, and maybe they will be ignored; but they will surely be shown and known at the beginning of the next life (1Tim 5:24).

17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, 18 And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; 19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, 20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. 21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? 22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? 23 Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God? 24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.

     Here is the self-righteous, hypocritical Jew who is in full knowledge of God’s will. He holds the truth of the Law in his very hands and yet does not follow its precepts. He teaches everyone what the Law says, but does not do it himself. Will such a person escape the judgment of God? (v3). Absolutely not! Indeed, those who possess the truth will be held to a higher standard and if they show themselves to be unworthy they will incur a greater punishment (Rom 1:18; Mat 12:41). This truth is no less incumbent upon the Christian hypocrite who outwardly appears pious and righteous, but whose inner heart is full of wickedness and sins.

The following is extracted from Adam Clarke’s commentary on Rom 2:21.

“That the Jewish priesthood was exceedingly corrupt in the time of the apostle, and that they were so long before, is fully evident from the sacred writings and from Josephus.  The high-priesthood was a matter of commerce, and was bought and sold like other commodities. Of this Josephus gives many instances. The rapine of Eli’s sons descended to several generations. Dr. Whitby well observes that of all these things mentioned by the apostle the Jewish doctors were notoriously guilty; and of most of them they were accused by our Lord.  1. They said and did not; and laid heavy burdens upon others, which they would not touch with their own fingers, Mat 23:3-4.  2. They made the house of God a den of thieves, Ma 21:13; Joh 2:16.  3. They were guilty of adultery by unjust divorces, Ma 19:9.  4. Their polygamy was scandalous: even their rabbins, when they came to any place, would exclaim, Who will be my wife for a day?  As to idolatry, they were perfectly saved from it ever since the Babylonish captivity but to this succeeded sacrilege, as is most evident in the profanation of the temple, by their commerce transacted even within its courts; and their teaching the people that even their aged parents might be left to starve, provided the children made a present to the temple of that which should have gone for their support.  According to Josephus, Bell. Jud. l. vi. c. 26, They were guilty of theft, treachery, adultery, sacrilege, rapine, and murder.  And he adds, that new ways of wickedness were invented by them; and that of all their abominations the temple was the receptacle.  In his Antiquities of the Jews, lib. xx. c. 8, he says: The servants of the high priests took away, by violence, the tithes of the priests, so that many of them perished for want of food.  Even their own writers acknowledge that there were great irregularities and abominations among the rabbins.”

25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

     Circumcision is spiritually beneficial for the Jew who keeps the Law, but is without value if he does not keep the Law. There a several New Testament correlations to this concept. Baptism, for instance, is beneficial for the Christian who keeps the commandments of Christ, but is without value to the one who disobeys Him. Praise and worship is beneficial for the obedient Christian, but abhorrent to God if he is rebellious (Isa 1:13). Let us go on to spiritual maturity, and leave childhood behind.

26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? 27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?

     Returning to the topic of Rom 2:14-15, the Apostle affirms that those who have never heard the Gospel message and yet live an honest life may yet receive Christ’s acceptance (Rom 5:13). While the details surrounding the salvation of such a person are uncertain and unrevealed in the Scriptures, this we do know: it is very rare to find in the world a person who honestly and sincerely perseveres in doing good (v7) without possessing the knowledge of Christ. Yes, the power and majesty of God can be inferred by a man studying His creation (Rom 1:20), but hearing the Gospel preached is far more effective.

     Cornelius is a prime example of a uncircumcised man who feared God and served his fellowman by love (Acts 10). Salvation came to his household. His account seems to be similar to other New Covenant examples, in which the Holy Spirit organizes the lives of seeking men and women so that they are brought into the sphere of Godly persons and environments. God is able to bring missionaries that follow the leading of the Spirit to discover these people.

     The righteousness (dikaioma) of the Law. This word should probably have been translated “statutes” or “judgments” as it was in Rom 1:32. See note on Rom 5:18.

28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

     Given the afore-stated truths concerning circumcision, it follows that to be a Jew in the present age of the Gospel is an inwardly condition instead of physical attributes and lineage. The Apostle Paul is teaching, of course, under the terms of the New Covenant, in which there is no longer Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision (Col 3:11). Now, he says, the real Jew is of the heart, in the spirit. In this sense, the true Jew is a Christian, whether a natural Jew or not. Any person who claims to be Jewish by the lineage of Abraham is an imposter (Php 3:3). You must be of faith to be considered a child of Abraham (Gal 3:7) no matter if you are a blood Jew or not (Gal 3:29). God is able of stones to raise up children unto Abraham (Mat 3:9).

     In the spirit and not in the letter. I believe this refers to obeying the spirit of the law of Christ and not lawyerly following the strict letter of the rule, which is the real meaning of “legalism.” That was the high crime of the Pharisees, who created all manner of exceptions and loopholes to the Mosaic Law so that they could avoid its more difficult, more important rules. Beware that we do not repeat their error! Jesus warned them (and us) to keep the spirit of the law, but not leave undone the minor parts either (Mat 23:23). The ditches are deep on both sides of the correct path. Both are traps for the disobedient; the self-righteous hypocrite on one side, and the lazy libertarian on the other. See Rom 7:6; 2Cor 3:6.

     Circumcision is that of the heart. The true, spiritual significance of circumcision is denying oneself the desires of the flesh (Col 2:11). Even the Prophets knew this (see Jer 4:4).